Mitchell Budden, Shalom I Benrimoj, Francisco Martinez Mardones, Sarah Dineen-Griffin
{"title":"探索药学实践范围的概念和定义:范围综述。","authors":"Mitchell Budden, Shalom I Benrimoj, Francisco Martinez Mardones, Sarah Dineen-Griffin","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The term scope of practice (SOP) is gaining increasing traction within the pharmacy profession, reflecting its growing importance. Despite this, definitions and interpretations remain varied, as evidenced by the number of definitions and the variety of synonyms and adjectives used in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(i) To examine the conceptual diversity in terminology used to describe SOP for the pharmacy profession across different jurisdictions; (ii) to propose a curated list of definitions and examples, along with recommended contexts for their application at local, national, and international levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to January 2025. Grey literature was explored using Google, the Overton database, and other methods. Titles and abstracts of identified records were screened, followed by full-text review against inclusion criteria. Definitions were systematically categorised to identify thematic patterns, overlaps, and distinctions, informing the development of a curated list of SOP definitions for pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,010 peer-reviewed records, 2,106 were screened after removing duplicates, with 31 publications meeting inclusion criteria. An additional 49 grey literature reports were included. A total of 172 definitions were compiled, capturing both phrasing and contextual application of SOP terminology. While no single universally accepted definition emerged, most aligned with three dominant conceptual themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The growing focus on pharmacy SOP highlights the need for a more unified and strategic framework. Consolidating definitions into a curated and accessible resource can improve clarity and consistency across educational, clinical, policy, and regulatory domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the concept and definition of scope of practice in pharmacy: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Budden, Shalom I Benrimoj, Francisco Martinez Mardones, Sarah Dineen-Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The term scope of practice (SOP) is gaining increasing traction within the pharmacy profession, reflecting its growing importance. Despite this, definitions and interpretations remain varied, as evidenced by the number of definitions and the variety of synonyms and adjectives used in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(i) To examine the conceptual diversity in terminology used to describe SOP for the pharmacy profession across different jurisdictions; (ii) to propose a curated list of definitions and examples, along with recommended contexts for their application at local, national, and international levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to January 2025. Grey literature was explored using Google, the Overton database, and other methods. Titles and abstracts of identified records were screened, followed by full-text review against inclusion criteria. Definitions were systematically categorised to identify thematic patterns, overlaps, and distinctions, informing the development of a curated list of SOP definitions for pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,010 peer-reviewed records, 2,106 were screened after removing duplicates, with 31 publications meeting inclusion criteria. An additional 49 grey literature reports were included. A total of 172 definitions were compiled, capturing both phrasing and contextual application of SOP terminology. While no single universally accepted definition emerged, most aligned with three dominant conceptual themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The growing focus on pharmacy SOP highlights the need for a more unified and strategic framework. Consolidating definitions into a curated and accessible resource can improve clarity and consistency across educational, clinical, policy, and regulatory domains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.09.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:术语实践范围(SOP)在药学专业中越来越受到关注,反映了其日益增长的重要性。尽管如此,定义和解释仍然各不相同,这可以从文学中定义的数量和同义词和形容词的多样性中得到证明。目的:(i)检查不同司法管辖区用于描述药学专业SOP的术语的概念多样性;(ii)提出一份定义和例子的精选清单,以及在地方、国家和国际层面应用这些定义和例子的推荐背景。方法:根据JBI方法进行范围审查,并根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Embase被检索到2025年1月。使用谷歌、Overton数据库和其他方法对灰色文献进行了探索。筛选已确定记录的标题和摘要,然后根据纳入标准对全文进行审查。定义被系统地分类,以确定主题模式、重叠和区别,为制定药理学SOP定义的策划清单提供信息。结果:在4010篇同行评议的文献中,剔除重复文献后筛选了2106篇,其中31篇符合纳入标准。另外纳入49份灰色文献报告。总共编制了172个定义,捕获了SOP术语的措辞和上下文应用。虽然没有一个被普遍接受的定义出现,但大多数定义与三个主要概念主题一致。结论:药房SOP越来越受到重视,需要一个更加统一和战略性的框架。将定义整合到一个管理的和可访问的资源中,可以提高跨教育、临床、政策和监管领域的清晰度和一致性。
Exploring the concept and definition of scope of practice in pharmacy: A scoping review.
Background: The term scope of practice (SOP) is gaining increasing traction within the pharmacy profession, reflecting its growing importance. Despite this, definitions and interpretations remain varied, as evidenced by the number of definitions and the variety of synonyms and adjectives used in the literature.
Objectives: (i) To examine the conceptual diversity in terminology used to describe SOP for the pharmacy profession across different jurisdictions; (ii) to propose a curated list of definitions and examples, along with recommended contexts for their application at local, national, and international levels.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted following JBI methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to January 2025. Grey literature was explored using Google, the Overton database, and other methods. Titles and abstracts of identified records were screened, followed by full-text review against inclusion criteria. Definitions were systematically categorised to identify thematic patterns, overlaps, and distinctions, informing the development of a curated list of SOP definitions for pharmacy.
Results: Of 4,010 peer-reviewed records, 2,106 were screened after removing duplicates, with 31 publications meeting inclusion criteria. An additional 49 grey literature reports were included. A total of 172 definitions were compiled, capturing both phrasing and contextual application of SOP terminology. While no single universally accepted definition emerged, most aligned with three dominant conceptual themes.
Conclusions: The growing focus on pharmacy SOP highlights the need for a more unified and strategic framework. Consolidating definitions into a curated and accessible resource can improve clarity and consistency across educational, clinical, policy, and regulatory domains.
期刊介绍:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.