托吡酯治疗可卡因使用障碍:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sridevi Shanmugam, Saravana Arunkumar, Vishal Agrawal, Praveen Kumar
{"title":"托吡酯治疗可卡因使用障碍:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sridevi Shanmugam, Saravana Arunkumar, Vishal Agrawal, Praveen Kumar","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the global burden of cocaine use, no pharmacological agent has received regulatory approval for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD). This study aims to systematically evaluate efficacy and safety of topiramate, with a focus on its impact on treatment retention, cocaine use and abstinence, craving reduction, and safety in individuals diagnosed with CUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify all relevant studies, a comprehensive search strategy was employed across several electronic databases. The search strategy focused on terms related to CUD and topiramate from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing topiramate with placebo, standard treatments, or non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included in the current review. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit of topiramate compared to control in promoting cocaine abstinence (Risk Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] = 2.83 [1.68-4.76]; p<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between topiramate and control groups regarding craving reduction (standardized mean difference = -0.28 [-1.92-1.36]). Overall, treatment retention outcomes across the included studies were mixed favoring topiramate with no statistical difference between two cohorts in dropout rates (RR = 0.94 [0.69 - 1.28]). The risk of adverse events was comparable between the topiramate and control groups (RR = 1.06 [0.91-1.23]; p = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topiramate may aid early abstinence and reduce cocaine use in individuals with CUD, with generally favorable treatment retention and tolerability. However, its effect on craving reduction appears limited, and further robust studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topiramate Therapy in Cocaine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sridevi Shanmugam, Saravana Arunkumar, Vishal Agrawal, Praveen Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the global burden of cocaine use, no pharmacological agent has received regulatory approval for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD). This study aims to systematically evaluate efficacy and safety of topiramate, with a focus on its impact on treatment retention, cocaine use and abstinence, craving reduction, and safety in individuals diagnosed with CUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify all relevant studies, a comprehensive search strategy was employed across several electronic databases. The search strategy focused on terms related to CUD and topiramate from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing topiramate with placebo, standard treatments, or non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included in the current review. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit of topiramate compared to control in promoting cocaine abstinence (Risk Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] = 2.83 [1.68-4.76]; p<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between topiramate and control groups regarding craving reduction (standardized mean difference = -0.28 [-1.92-1.36]). Overall, treatment retention outcomes across the included studies were mixed favoring topiramate with no statistical difference between two cohorts in dropout rates (RR = 0.94 [0.69 - 1.28]). The risk of adverse events was comparable between the topiramate and control groups (RR = 1.06 [0.91-1.23]; p = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topiramate may aid early abstinence and reduce cocaine use in individuals with CUD, with generally favorable treatment retention and tolerability. However, its effect on craving reduction appears limited, and further robust studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管可卡因使用是全球负担,但还没有药物获得监管部门批准用于治疗可卡因使用障碍(CUD)。本研究旨在系统评估托吡酯的疗效和安全性,重点关注其对CUD患者治疗保留、可卡因使用和戒断、渴望减少和安全性的影响。方法:为了确定所有相关的研究,在几个电子数据库中采用了综合搜索策略。搜索策略集中于2000年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间与CUD和托吡酯相关的术语。符合条件的研究包括比较托吡酯与安慰剂、标准治疗或非药物干预的随机对照试验。结果:本综述纳入了10项研究。meta分析显示,与对照组相比,托吡酯在促进可卡因戒断方面有统计学意义(风险比[95%置信区间]= 2.83[1.68-4.76]);结论:托吡酯可能有助于CUD患者早期戒断和减少可卡因使用,总体上具有良好的治疗保持性和耐受性。然而,它对减少渴望的作用似乎有限,需要进一步强有力的研究来证实其长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topiramate Therapy in Cocaine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Despite the global burden of cocaine use, no pharmacological agent has received regulatory approval for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD). This study aims to systematically evaluate efficacy and safety of topiramate, with a focus on its impact on treatment retention, cocaine use and abstinence, craving reduction, and safety in individuals diagnosed with CUD.

Methods: To identify all relevant studies, a comprehensive search strategy was employed across several electronic databases. The search strategy focused on terms related to CUD and topiramate from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing topiramate with placebo, standard treatments, or non-pharmacological interventions.

Results: Ten studies were included in the current review. Meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit of topiramate compared to control in promoting cocaine abstinence (Risk Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] = 2.83 [1.68-4.76]; p<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between topiramate and control groups regarding craving reduction (standardized mean difference = -0.28 [-1.92-1.36]). Overall, treatment retention outcomes across the included studies were mixed favoring topiramate with no statistical difference between two cohorts in dropout rates (RR = 0.94 [0.69 - 1.28]). The risk of adverse events was comparable between the topiramate and control groups (RR = 1.06 [0.91-1.23]; p = 0.44).

Conclusion: Topiramate may aid early abstinence and reduce cocaine use in individuals with CUD, with generally favorable treatment retention and tolerability. However, its effect on craving reduction appears limited, and further robust studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信