综合基础科学考试临床前学业成绩的预测效度:伊朗医学生全国队列研究

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S552380
Farhang Rashidi, Reza Sattarpour, Alipasha Meysamie
{"title":"综合基础科学考试临床前学业成绩的预测效度:伊朗医学生全国队列研究","authors":"Farhang Rashidi, Reza Sattarpour, Alipasha Meysamie","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S552380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical education directly impacts patient care, yet the predictive validity of pre-clinical academic performance for licensure exam outcomes remains debated. This national, multi-institutional study (2019-2021) assessed the relationship between university course grades, cumulative grade point average (GPA), and Comprehensive Basic Science Examination (CBSE) scores in Iranian medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Course grades and GPAs of 23 medical schools were linked to CBSE outcomes of 51 medical schools across five consecutive exam periods via student national ID. Pearson's correlation, paired t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-square assessed trends. Hierarchical cluster analysis (dendrogram) examined course grade correlations. Independent CBSE total score predictors were found using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 25,757 individual records, 9,359 (45.2% female) had complete academic and CBSE data, making them eligible for primary analyses (84.5% passed CBSE on the first attempt). The GPA was 15.11±1.74, and the CBSE score was 101.68±24.61. All course grades correlated significantly with CBSE subtests (r=0.055-0.544, P<0.001). A significant moderate association (r=0.492, P<0.001) exists between overall GPA and CBSE. Repeat examinees had considerably lower GPAs and CBSE scores (P<0.001). GPA (β=0.318), Anatomy (β=0.158), Physiology (β=0.135), Epidemiology (β=0.043), and Virology (β=0.043) were the most significant predictors in regression modeling (R²=0.426). Cluster analysis showed that academic grades in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry were strongly correlated with CBSE subtests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study represents the first large-scale national dataset in Iran pertaining to medical education. Pre-clinical GPA and course grades exhibit overall and subject-specific, notable predictive validity for CBSE performance. To enhance medical education and licensure results, it is advisable to implement standardized, cross-institutional comparisons alongside dynamic curriculum reviews. The regression model and clustering insights provide a framework for targeted educational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1747-1759"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12493098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Validity of Pre-Clinical Academic Achievements in Comprehensive Basic Science Examination: A Nationwide Cohort of Iranian Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Farhang Rashidi, Reza Sattarpour, Alipasha Meysamie\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S552380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical education directly impacts patient care, yet the predictive validity of pre-clinical academic performance for licensure exam outcomes remains debated. This national, multi-institutional study (2019-2021) assessed the relationship between university course grades, cumulative grade point average (GPA), and Comprehensive Basic Science Examination (CBSE) scores in Iranian medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Course grades and GPAs of 23 medical schools were linked to CBSE outcomes of 51 medical schools across five consecutive exam periods via student national ID. Pearson's correlation, paired t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-square assessed trends. Hierarchical cluster analysis (dendrogram) examined course grade correlations. Independent CBSE total score predictors were found using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 25,757 individual records, 9,359 (45.2% female) had complete academic and CBSE data, making them eligible for primary analyses (84.5% passed CBSE on the first attempt). The GPA was 15.11±1.74, and the CBSE score was 101.68±24.61. All course grades correlated significantly with CBSE subtests (r=0.055-0.544, P<0.001). A significant moderate association (r=0.492, P<0.001) exists between overall GPA and CBSE. Repeat examinees had considerably lower GPAs and CBSE scores (P<0.001). GPA (β=0.318), Anatomy (β=0.158), Physiology (β=0.135), Epidemiology (β=0.043), and Virology (β=0.043) were the most significant predictors in regression modeling (R²=0.426). Cluster analysis showed that academic grades in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry were strongly correlated with CBSE subtests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study represents the first large-scale national dataset in Iran pertaining to medical education. Pre-clinical GPA and course grades exhibit overall and subject-specific, notable predictive validity for CBSE performance. To enhance medical education and licensure results, it is advisable to implement standardized, cross-institutional comparisons alongside dynamic curriculum reviews. The regression model and clustering insights provide a framework for targeted educational interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1747-1759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12493098/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S552380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S552380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医学教育直接影响患者护理,但临床前学习成绩对执业医师考试结果的预测有效性仍存在争议。这项全国性、多机构研究(2019-2021)评估了伊朗医学生的大学课程成绩、累积平均绩点(GPA)和综合基础科学考试(CBSE)成绩之间的关系。方法:通过学生国民身份证将23所医学院的课程成绩和gpa与51所医学院连续5个考试期间的CBSE成绩联系起来。Pearson相关、配对t检验、方差分析和卡方分析评估趋势。层次聚类分析(树状图)检验了课程成绩的相关性。使用多元线性回归找到独立的CBSE总分预测因子。结果:在25,757份个人记录中,9,359份(45.2%为女性)具有完整的学术和CBSE数据,使其有资格进行初步分析(84.5%通过了CBSE第一次尝试)。GPA为15.11±1.74,CBSE评分为101.68±24.61。所有课程成绩与CBSE子测试显著相关(r=0.055-0.544)。结论:本研究是伊朗第一个与医学教育相关的大规模国家数据集。临床前GPA和课程成绩对CBSE表现表现出总体和学科特异性的显著预测效度。为了提高医学教育和许可结果,建议在动态课程审查的同时实施标准化的跨机构比较。回归模型和聚类见解为有针对性的教育干预提供了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Validity of Pre-Clinical Academic Achievements in Comprehensive Basic Science Examination: A Nationwide Cohort of Iranian Medical Students.

Background: Medical education directly impacts patient care, yet the predictive validity of pre-clinical academic performance for licensure exam outcomes remains debated. This national, multi-institutional study (2019-2021) assessed the relationship between university course grades, cumulative grade point average (GPA), and Comprehensive Basic Science Examination (CBSE) scores in Iranian medical students.

Methods: Course grades and GPAs of 23 medical schools were linked to CBSE outcomes of 51 medical schools across five consecutive exam periods via student national ID. Pearson's correlation, paired t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-square assessed trends. Hierarchical cluster analysis (dendrogram) examined course grade correlations. Independent CBSE total score predictors were found using multiple linear regression.

Results: Of the 25,757 individual records, 9,359 (45.2% female) had complete academic and CBSE data, making them eligible for primary analyses (84.5% passed CBSE on the first attempt). The GPA was 15.11±1.74, and the CBSE score was 101.68±24.61. All course grades correlated significantly with CBSE subtests (r=0.055-0.544, P<0.001). A significant moderate association (r=0.492, P<0.001) exists between overall GPA and CBSE. Repeat examinees had considerably lower GPAs and CBSE scores (P<0.001). GPA (β=0.318), Anatomy (β=0.158), Physiology (β=0.135), Epidemiology (β=0.043), and Virology (β=0.043) were the most significant predictors in regression modeling (R²=0.426). Cluster analysis showed that academic grades in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry were strongly correlated with CBSE subtests.

Conclusion: This study represents the first large-scale national dataset in Iran pertaining to medical education. Pre-clinical GPA and course grades exhibit overall and subject-specific, notable predictive validity for CBSE performance. To enhance medical education and licensure results, it is advisable to implement standardized, cross-institutional comparisons alongside dynamic curriculum reviews. The regression model and clustering insights provide a framework for targeted educational interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信