采用生物仿制药对化疗药物利用和成本的影响——一项单中心回顾性研究

Q4 Medicine
Yasutaka Sakamoto, Hirofumi Koizumi, Ayako Shimizu, Kazuhiro Kawabe, Haruka Shigemura, Aoi Yoshitomo, Takuya Hasegawa, Kana Uyama, Naruhiro Hatakeyama, Hidetomo Ajima, Kazuo Ide, Tadashi Wakasugi, Hirofumi Koike, Yukiko Sahashi
{"title":"采用生物仿制药对化疗药物利用和成本的影响——一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Yasutaka Sakamoto, Hirofumi Koizumi, Ayako Shimizu, Kazuhiro Kawabe, Haruka Shigemura, Aoi Yoshitomo, Takuya Hasegawa, Kana Uyama, Naruhiro Hatakeyama, Hidetomo Ajima, Kazuo Ide, Tadashi Wakasugi, Hirofumi Koike, Yukiko Sahashi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Yokohama City University Hospital recommends the use of biosimilars (BS) in newly diagnosed patients. Previous studies have focused on cost reductions through BS introduction, which compared only identical components. In contrast, this study assesses changes in the usage of drugs within the same therapeutic class. We analyzed the number of vials of anti‒CD20 antibodies used from 2017 to 2021 and anti‒VEGF antibodies used from 2018 to 2022, before and after the introduction of rituximab and bevacizumab BS, respectively. Volume shares and drug costs for each formulation were calculated annually. The drug cost reduction ratio was determined by comparing actual drug costs with hypothetical costs if only brand‒name drugs were used. The average drug cost per prescription was also calculated. From 2017 to 2021, the share of brand rituximab was decreased from 100.0% to 0.0%, while rituximab BS was increased from 0.0% to 93.9%, and obinutuzumab was increased from 0.0% to 6.1%. Although BS reduced drug costs by 22.9% in 2021, the average cost per prescription increased by 30.0%. From 2018 to 2022, the share of brand bevacizumab was decreased from 89.5% to 3.0%, while bevacizumab BS was increased from 0.0% to 96.5%, with ramucirumab and aflibercept beta showing decreased usage. BS reduced drug costs by 64.7%, and the average cost per prescription dropped by 65.5%. The introduction of BS significantly reduced drug costs, though changes in prescription practices affected overall costs. Future assessments should consider clinical guidelines and evaluate drugs across therapeutic classes to provide a more comprehensive view of BS impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":"52 9","pages":"671-676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Impact of Biosimilar Adoption on Drug Utilization and Cost in Chemotherapy-A Single Center Retrospective Study].\",\"authors\":\"Yasutaka Sakamoto, Hirofumi Koizumi, Ayako Shimizu, Kazuhiro Kawabe, Haruka Shigemura, Aoi Yoshitomo, Takuya Hasegawa, Kana Uyama, Naruhiro Hatakeyama, Hidetomo Ajima, Kazuo Ide, Tadashi Wakasugi, Hirofumi Koike, Yukiko Sahashi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Yokohama City University Hospital recommends the use of biosimilars (BS) in newly diagnosed patients. Previous studies have focused on cost reductions through BS introduction, which compared only identical components. In contrast, this study assesses changes in the usage of drugs within the same therapeutic class. We analyzed the number of vials of anti‒CD20 antibodies used from 2017 to 2021 and anti‒VEGF antibodies used from 2018 to 2022, before and after the introduction of rituximab and bevacizumab BS, respectively. Volume shares and drug costs for each formulation were calculated annually. The drug cost reduction ratio was determined by comparing actual drug costs with hypothetical costs if only brand‒name drugs were used. The average drug cost per prescription was also calculated. From 2017 to 2021, the share of brand rituximab was decreased from 100.0% to 0.0%, while rituximab BS was increased from 0.0% to 93.9%, and obinutuzumab was increased from 0.0% to 6.1%. Although BS reduced drug costs by 22.9% in 2021, the average cost per prescription increased by 30.0%. From 2018 to 2022, the share of brand bevacizumab was decreased from 89.5% to 3.0%, while bevacizumab BS was increased from 0.0% to 96.5%, with ramucirumab and aflibercept beta showing decreased usage. BS reduced drug costs by 64.7%, and the average cost per prescription dropped by 65.5%. The introduction of BS significantly reduced drug costs, though changes in prescription practices affected overall costs. Future assessments should consider clinical guidelines and evaluate drugs across therapeutic classes to provide a more comprehensive view of BS impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"671-676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

横滨市立大学医院建议在新诊断的患者中使用生物仿制药(BS)。以前的研究主要集中在通过引入BS来降低成本,这种方法只比较相同的组件。相比之下,本研究评估了同一治疗类别中药物使用的变化。我们分别分析了利妥昔单抗和贝伐单抗BS引入前后,2017年至2021年使用的抗cd20抗体和2018年至2022年使用的抗vegf抗体的瓶数。每种制剂的体积份额和药品费用每年计算一次。仅使用品牌药时,通过比较实际药品成本与假设药品成本来确定药品成本降低率。同时计算每张处方的平均药费。从2017年到2021年,利妥昔单抗品牌份额从100.0%下降到0.0%,而利妥昔单抗BS从0.0%上升到93.9%,奥比努单抗从0.0%上升到6.1%。尽管2021年BS降低了22.9%的药品成本,但每张处方的平均成本却增加了30.0%。2018 - 2022年,品牌贝伐单抗的份额从89.5%下降到3.0%,而贝伐单抗BS的份额从0.0%上升到96.5%,ramucirumab和afliberept β的使用率下降。BS使药品成本降低了64.7%,平均每张处方成本下降了65.5%。BS的引入显著降低了药物成本,尽管处方实践的变化影响了总体成本。未来的评估应考虑临床指南和跨治疗类别的药物评估,以提供对BS影响的更全面的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Impact of Biosimilar Adoption on Drug Utilization and Cost in Chemotherapy-A Single Center Retrospective Study].

Yokohama City University Hospital recommends the use of biosimilars (BS) in newly diagnosed patients. Previous studies have focused on cost reductions through BS introduction, which compared only identical components. In contrast, this study assesses changes in the usage of drugs within the same therapeutic class. We analyzed the number of vials of anti‒CD20 antibodies used from 2017 to 2021 and anti‒VEGF antibodies used from 2018 to 2022, before and after the introduction of rituximab and bevacizumab BS, respectively. Volume shares and drug costs for each formulation were calculated annually. The drug cost reduction ratio was determined by comparing actual drug costs with hypothetical costs if only brand‒name drugs were used. The average drug cost per prescription was also calculated. From 2017 to 2021, the share of brand rituximab was decreased from 100.0% to 0.0%, while rituximab BS was increased from 0.0% to 93.9%, and obinutuzumab was increased from 0.0% to 6.1%. Although BS reduced drug costs by 22.9% in 2021, the average cost per prescription increased by 30.0%. From 2018 to 2022, the share of brand bevacizumab was decreased from 89.5% to 3.0%, while bevacizumab BS was increased from 0.0% to 96.5%, with ramucirumab and aflibercept beta showing decreased usage. BS reduced drug costs by 64.7%, and the average cost per prescription dropped by 65.5%. The introduction of BS significantly reduced drug costs, though changes in prescription practices affected overall costs. Future assessments should consider clinical guidelines and evaluate drugs across therapeutic classes to provide a more comprehensive view of BS impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信