重新定义力量:挑战黑人女性在护理教育和领导中的刻板印象。

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251382659
Kechi Iheduru-Anderson, Christiana Akanegbu, Julia U Ugorji
{"title":"重新定义力量:挑战黑人女性在护理教育和领导中的刻板印象。","authors":"Kechi Iheduru-Anderson, Christiana Akanegbu, Julia U Ugorji","doi":"10.1177/23779608251382659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Strong Black Woman (SBW) schema, deeply embedded in sociocultural and historical narratives, portrays Black women as inherently resilient, self-sacrificing, and emotionally restrained. While it can serve as a source of pride and survival, the schema often imposes psychological, emotional, and physical burdens-particularly in academic nursing, where systemic inequities intersect with racialized and gendered expectations. This paper examines how the SBW schema operates in nursing education and leadership and advocates for a redefinition of strength that embraces vulnerability, wellness, and collective care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review synthesizes research on the SBW schema with a focus on its historical origins, cultural significance, and psychological impacts. Peer-reviewed publications in English from 2000 to 2024 were identified through searches in CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, EBSCO, and Google Scholar using terms related to the SBW schema and nursing contexts. Although few nursing-specific studies exist, key articles by Jefferies, and Parks and Hayman informed the discussion. Additional insights were drawn from psychology, sociology, public health, and Black feminist theory to contextualize its implications for nursing education and leadership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The schema contributes to emotional suppression, delayed help-seeking, and heightened risk of burnout. In predominantly white institutions, Black women in nursing experience amplified pressures to overperform, serve as cultural representatives, and navigate professional isolation. These expectations are reinforced by intergenerational and media-driven narratives. While the schema can foster pride and perseverance, its glorification masks its long-term mental health consequences. Emerging literature calls for a paradigm shift that integrates emotional authenticity and systemic support into nursing leadership and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Redefining strength in nursing requires dismantling individualistic ideals of resilience and affirming vulnerability as a culturally grounded act of care and resistance. Structural change must include equity-focused policies, antiracist leadership development, and emotionally safe environments that validate the full humanity of Black women in academic nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251382659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining Strength: Challenging the Strong Black Woman Stereotype in Nursing Education and Leadership.\",\"authors\":\"Kechi Iheduru-Anderson, Christiana Akanegbu, Julia U Ugorji\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23779608251382659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Strong Black Woman (SBW) schema, deeply embedded in sociocultural and historical narratives, portrays Black women as inherently resilient, self-sacrificing, and emotionally restrained. While it can serve as a source of pride and survival, the schema often imposes psychological, emotional, and physical burdens-particularly in academic nursing, where systemic inequities intersect with racialized and gendered expectations. This paper examines how the SBW schema operates in nursing education and leadership and advocates for a redefinition of strength that embraces vulnerability, wellness, and collective care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review synthesizes research on the SBW schema with a focus on its historical origins, cultural significance, and psychological impacts. Peer-reviewed publications in English from 2000 to 2024 were identified through searches in CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, EBSCO, and Google Scholar using terms related to the SBW schema and nursing contexts. Although few nursing-specific studies exist, key articles by Jefferies, and Parks and Hayman informed the discussion. Additional insights were drawn from psychology, sociology, public health, and Black feminist theory to contextualize its implications for nursing education and leadership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The schema contributes to emotional suppression, delayed help-seeking, and heightened risk of burnout. In predominantly white institutions, Black women in nursing experience amplified pressures to overperform, serve as cultural representatives, and navigate professional isolation. These expectations are reinforced by intergenerational and media-driven narratives. While the schema can foster pride and perseverance, its glorification masks its long-term mental health consequences. Emerging literature calls for a paradigm shift that integrates emotional authenticity and systemic support into nursing leadership and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Redefining strength in nursing requires dismantling individualistic ideals of resilience and affirming vulnerability as a culturally grounded act of care and resistance. Structural change must include equity-focused policies, antiracist leadership development, and emotionally safe environments that validate the full humanity of Black women in academic nursing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23779608251382659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489196/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251382659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251382659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑人女强人(Strong Black Woman, SBW)图式深深根植于社会文化和历史叙事中,它将黑人女性描绘成具有内在韧性、自我牺牲精神和情感克制的形象。虽然它可以作为自豪感和生存的源泉,但这种模式往往会给心理、情感和身体带来负担——尤其是在学术护理领域,系统性的不平等与种族化和性别化的期望交织在一起。本文探讨了SBW模式如何在护理教育和领导中运作,并倡导重新定义力量,包括脆弱性,健康和集体护理。方法:本文从历史渊源、文化意义和心理影响三个方面对小女恋图式的研究进行综述。通过检索CINAHL、PubMed、ERIC、EBSCO和b谷歌Scholar,使用与SBW模式和护理背景相关的术语,确定了2000年至2024年的同行评议的英文出版物。虽然很少有专门的护理研究存在,但Jefferies、Parks和Hayman的关键文章为讨论提供了信息。从心理学、社会学、公共卫生和黑人女权主义理论中获得了更多的见解,将其对护理教育和领导力的影响置于背景下。结果:图式会导致情绪压抑、求助延迟和倦怠风险增加。在以白人为主的护理机构中,黑人女性的护理经历放大了表现优异、作为文化代表和应对专业隔离的压力。这些期望被代际和媒体驱动的叙事所强化。虽然这种模式可以培养自豪感和毅力,但它的美化掩盖了它对心理健康的长期影响。新兴文献呼吁将情感真实性和系统支持整合到护理领导和教育中的范式转变。结论:重新定义护理中的力量需要拆除个人主义的弹性理想,并确认脆弱性是一种基于文化的护理和抵抗行为。结构性变革必须包括以平等为中心的政策、反种族主义的领导力发展,以及情感安全的环境,这些环境可以证明黑人女性在学术护理领域的全部人性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redefining Strength: Challenging the Strong Black Woman Stereotype in Nursing Education and Leadership.

Introduction: The Strong Black Woman (SBW) schema, deeply embedded in sociocultural and historical narratives, portrays Black women as inherently resilient, self-sacrificing, and emotionally restrained. While it can serve as a source of pride and survival, the schema often imposes psychological, emotional, and physical burdens-particularly in academic nursing, where systemic inequities intersect with racialized and gendered expectations. This paper examines how the SBW schema operates in nursing education and leadership and advocates for a redefinition of strength that embraces vulnerability, wellness, and collective care.

Methods: This narrative review synthesizes research on the SBW schema with a focus on its historical origins, cultural significance, and psychological impacts. Peer-reviewed publications in English from 2000 to 2024 were identified through searches in CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, EBSCO, and Google Scholar using terms related to the SBW schema and nursing contexts. Although few nursing-specific studies exist, key articles by Jefferies, and Parks and Hayman informed the discussion. Additional insights were drawn from psychology, sociology, public health, and Black feminist theory to contextualize its implications for nursing education and leadership.

Results: The schema contributes to emotional suppression, delayed help-seeking, and heightened risk of burnout. In predominantly white institutions, Black women in nursing experience amplified pressures to overperform, serve as cultural representatives, and navigate professional isolation. These expectations are reinforced by intergenerational and media-driven narratives. While the schema can foster pride and perseverance, its glorification masks its long-term mental health consequences. Emerging literature calls for a paradigm shift that integrates emotional authenticity and systemic support into nursing leadership and education.

Conclusion: Redefining strength in nursing requires dismantling individualistic ideals of resilience and affirming vulnerability as a culturally grounded act of care and resistance. Structural change must include equity-focused policies, antiracist leadership development, and emotionally safe environments that validate the full humanity of Black women in academic nursing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信