{"title":"纯氟清漆与含钙磷酸盐添加剂的两种氟清漆表面处理对牙釉质溶解度和再矿化电位影响的比较研究","authors":"Sanketh K Karanth, Jaya Naidu","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoride Varnishes have incorporated calcium and phosphate in various forms, such as casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), and xylitol-coated calcium and phosphate (CXP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to assess and compare the effect on enamel solubility and remineralizing potential following the application of Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish, MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup>, and Profluorid Varnish.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>For assessing both enamel solubility and remineralization potential, 40 enamel specimens were randomly divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 10/group) each, according to surface treatment: group I-no treatment (control); group II-Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish; group III-MI Varnish<sup>TM;</sup> group IV-Profluorid Varnish. The specimens were processed according to the respective experimental protocols. The percentage decrease of surface microhardness (SMH) and surface hardness recovery percentage were calculated. For statistical analysis, a paired sample <i>t</i>-test and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's <i>Post Hoc</i> test were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish demonstrated the lowest mean percentage decrease of SMH, followed by MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup>, Profluorid Varnish, and the control group. MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup> demonstrated the highest mean SHR%, followed by Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish, Profluorid Varnish and the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish and MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup> demonstrated superior acid resistance and higher remineralizing potential compared to Profluorid Varnish.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Karanth SK, Naidu J. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect on Enamel Solubility and Remineralizing Potential Following Surface Treatment with Fluoride-alone Varnish and Two Fluoride Varnishes Containing Calcium and Phosphate Additives: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(5):553-559.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 5","pages":"553-559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of the Effect on Enamel Solubility and Remineralizing Potential Following Surface Treatment with Fluoride-alone Varnish and Two Fluoride Varnishes Containing Calcium and Phosphate Additives: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanketh K Karanth, Jaya Naidu\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoride Varnishes have incorporated calcium and phosphate in various forms, such as casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), and xylitol-coated calcium and phosphate (CXP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to assess and compare the effect on enamel solubility and remineralizing potential following the application of Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish, MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup>, and Profluorid Varnish.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>For assessing both enamel solubility and remineralization potential, 40 enamel specimens were randomly divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 10/group) each, according to surface treatment: group I-no treatment (control); group II-Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish; group III-MI Varnish<sup>TM;</sup> group IV-Profluorid Varnish. The specimens were processed according to the respective experimental protocols. The percentage decrease of surface microhardness (SMH) and surface hardness recovery percentage were calculated. For statistical analysis, a paired sample <i>t</i>-test and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's <i>Post Hoc</i> test were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish demonstrated the lowest mean percentage decrease of SMH, followed by MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup>, Profluorid Varnish, and the control group. MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup> demonstrated the highest mean SHR%, followed by Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish, Profluorid Varnish and the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Embrace<sup>TM</sup> Varnish and MI Varnish<sup>TM</sup> demonstrated superior acid resistance and higher remineralizing potential compared to Profluorid Varnish.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Karanth SK, Naidu J. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect on Enamel Solubility and Remineralizing Potential Following Surface Treatment with Fluoride-alone Varnish and Two Fluoride Varnishes Containing Calcium and Phosphate Additives: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(5):553-559.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"553-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488506/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：氟化物清漆以各种形式加入钙和磷酸盐，如酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙（CPP-ACP）和木糖醇包被钙和磷酸盐（CXP）。目的：本体外研究的目的是评估和比较应用恩布拉tm清漆、MI清漆tm和Profluorid清漆后对牙釉质溶解度和再矿化电位的影响。设计：为了评估牙釉质溶解度和再矿化潜力，40个牙釉质标本根据表面处理情况随机分为4组（n = 10/组）：ⅰ组-未处理组（对照组）；ii组-恩布拉etm清漆；iii组- mi清漆tm；第四组-富氟清漆。根据各自的实验方案对标本进行处理。计算了表面显微硬度（SMH）下降百分比和表面硬度恢复百分比。统计分析采用配对样本t检验和方差分析（ANOVA）与Tukey’s Post Hoc检验。结果：恩brencetm清漆显示SMH的平均下降百分比最低，其次是MI清漆tm、Profluorid清漆和对照组。MI清漆tm显示出最高的平均SHR%，其次是恩拉玛清漆、Profluorid清漆和对照组。结论：与Profluorid清漆相比，nxp清漆和MI清漆具有更好的耐酸性能和更高的再矿化潜力。引用本文：Karanth SK， Naidu J.单纯含氟清漆和含钙磷酸盐的两种含氟清漆表面处理对牙釉质溶解度和再矿化电位影响的比较研究。中华临床儿科杂志，2015;18(5):553-559。
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect on Enamel Solubility and Remineralizing Potential Following Surface Treatment with Fluoride-alone Varnish and Two Fluoride Varnishes Containing Calcium and Phosphate Additives: An In Vitro Study.
Background: Fluoride Varnishes have incorporated calcium and phosphate in various forms, such as casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), and xylitol-coated calcium and phosphate (CXP).
Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the effect on enamel solubility and remineralizing potential following the application of EmbraceTM Varnish, MI VarnishTM, and Profluorid Varnish.
Design: For assessing both enamel solubility and remineralization potential, 40 enamel specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10/group) each, according to surface treatment: group I-no treatment (control); group II-EmbraceTM Varnish; group III-MI VarnishTM; group IV-Profluorid Varnish. The specimens were processed according to the respective experimental protocols. The percentage decrease of surface microhardness (SMH) and surface hardness recovery percentage were calculated. For statistical analysis, a paired sample t-test and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's Post Hoc test were applied.
Results: EmbraceTM Varnish demonstrated the lowest mean percentage decrease of SMH, followed by MI VarnishTM, Profluorid Varnish, and the control group. MI VarnishTM demonstrated the highest mean SHR%, followed by EmbraceTM Varnish, Profluorid Varnish and the control group.
Conclusion: EmbraceTM Varnish and MI VarnishTM demonstrated superior acid resistance and higher remineralizing potential compared to Profluorid Varnish.
How to cite this article: Karanth SK, Naidu J. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect on Enamel Solubility and Remineralizing Potential Following Surface Treatment with Fluoride-alone Varnish and Two Fluoride Varnishes Containing Calcium and Phosphate Additives: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(5):553-559.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
