SOSkin:一项在线认知行为疗法治疗抠皮障碍的随机临床试验。

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alice Castro Menezes Xavier, Clarissa Prati, Anita Castro Menezes Xavier, Murilo G Brandão, Alice Barbieri Ebert, Malu Joyce de A Macedo, Maria João Baptista Fernandes, Gisele Gus Manfro, Carolina Blaya Dreher
{"title":"SOSkin:一项在线认知行为疗法治疗抠皮障碍的随机临床试验。","authors":"Alice Castro Menezes Xavier, Clarissa Prati, Anita Castro Menezes Xavier, Murilo G Brandão, Alice Barbieri Ebert, Malu Joyce de A Macedo, Maria João Baptista Fernandes, Gisele Gus Manfro, Carolina Blaya Dreher","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for Skin Picking Disorder (SPD). However, since individuals have limited access to CBT, telepsychotherapy can overcome this barrier.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the efficacy of a self-guided digital CBT intervention for SPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This controlled clinical trial randomized 163 patients with SPD to receive 4 weeks of online CBT (SOSkin) or a control intervention (videos about quality of life). Primary outcome was the improvement in the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R) and secondary outcomes were the improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index Scale (DLQI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9). Instruments were applied at baseline, middle and end of intervention and at 1 and 3 months of follow up. SOSkin usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference between groups in completion rates. SOSkin has excellent usability. Both groups improved the SPS-R and the DLQI scores after treatment and at the follow-up assessments. We found a significant time*group interaction in favor of CBT on SPS-R. Effect size of the intervention compared to control over SPS-R was small after treatment and at the follow-ups; over the DLQI was moderate after treatment and small at the follow-ups. CBT was superior to control on SPS-R when we compared the percentage of change from baseline. CBT was superior to control condition over DLQI at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOSkin: a randomized clinical trial of on-line cognitive-behavioral therapy for Skin Picking Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Castro Menezes Xavier, Clarissa Prati, Anita Castro Menezes Xavier, Murilo G Brandão, Alice Barbieri Ebert, Malu Joyce de A Macedo, Maria João Baptista Fernandes, Gisele Gus Manfro, Carolina Blaya Dreher\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for Skin Picking Disorder (SPD). However, since individuals have limited access to CBT, telepsychotherapy can overcome this barrier.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the efficacy of a self-guided digital CBT intervention for SPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This controlled clinical trial randomized 163 patients with SPD to receive 4 weeks of online CBT (SOSkin) or a control intervention (videos about quality of life). Primary outcome was the improvement in the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R) and secondary outcomes were the improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index Scale (DLQI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9). Instruments were applied at baseline, middle and end of intervention and at 1 and 3 months of follow up. SOSkin usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference between groups in completion rates. SOSkin has excellent usability. Both groups improved the SPS-R and the DLQI scores after treatment and at the follow-up assessments. We found a significant time*group interaction in favor of CBT on SPS-R. Effect size of the intervention compared to control over SPS-R was small after treatment and at the follow-ups; over the DLQI was moderate after treatment and small at the follow-ups. CBT was superior to control on SPS-R when we compared the percentage of change from baseline. CBT was superior to control condition over DLQI at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗扒皮障碍(SPD)的有效方法。然而,由于个体接触CBT的机会有限,远程心理治疗可以克服这一障碍。目的:评价自我引导数字化CBT干预SPD的效果。方法:本对照临床试验随机选取163例SPD患者,接受为期4周的在线CBT (SOSkin)或对照干预(关于生活质量的视频)。主要结果为皮肤采摘量表(SPS-R)的改善,次要结果为皮肤生活质量指数量表(DLQI)、广泛性焦虑障碍评估量表(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-9量表(PHQ-9)的改善。在基线、干预中期和结束时以及随访1个月和3个月时使用仪器。使用系统可用性量表(SUS)评估SOSkin可用性。采用广义估计方程模型(GEE)对数据进行分析。结论:两组间完成率无显著差异。SOSkin具有出色的可用性。两组在治疗后及随访时均改善了SPS-R和DLQI评分。我们发现CBT对SPS-R有显著的时间*组交互作用。在治疗后和随访时,与对照相比,干预的效应量较小;治疗后DLQI中等,随访时DLQI较小。当我们比较从基线变化的百分比时,CBT优于对照的SPS-R。治疗结束时和随访1个月时,CBT优于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SOSkin: a randomized clinical trial of on-line cognitive-behavioral therapy for Skin Picking Disorder.

Background: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for Skin Picking Disorder (SPD). However, since individuals have limited access to CBT, telepsychotherapy can overcome this barrier.

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of a self-guided digital CBT intervention for SPD.

Methods: This controlled clinical trial randomized 163 patients with SPD to receive 4 weeks of online CBT (SOSkin) or a control intervention (videos about quality of life). Primary outcome was the improvement in the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R) and secondary outcomes were the improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index Scale (DLQI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale (PHQ-9). Instruments were applied at baseline, middle and end of intervention and at 1 and 3 months of follow up. SOSkin usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Data were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE).

Conclusion: There was no difference between groups in completion rates. SOSkin has excellent usability. Both groups improved the SPS-R and the DLQI scores after treatment and at the follow-up assessments. We found a significant time*group interaction in favor of CBT on SPS-R. Effect size of the intervention compared to control over SPS-R was small after treatment and at the follow-ups; over the DLQI was moderate after treatment and small at the follow-ups. CBT was superior to control on SPS-R when we compared the percentage of change from baseline. CBT was superior to control condition over DLQI at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信