福斯妥吡坦致乳腺癌相关过敏4例报告

Q4 Medicine
Masaru Takemae, Yumiko Ishikawa, Tomoka Toyota, Jiro Ando
{"title":"福斯妥吡坦致乳腺癌相关过敏4例报告","authors":"Masaru Takemae, Yumiko Ishikawa, Tomoka Toyota, Jiro Ando","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We describe the cases of 4 patients with breast cancer who developed an allergy to fosnetupitant (Pro‒NETU). Case 1: A 67‒year‒old woman with breast cancer and bone metastasis received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, tachycardia, and dyspnea. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, the patient's symptoms were alleviated. She experienced no further complaints of such symptoms, and her premedication subsequently excluded Pro‒NETU. Case 2: A 50‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, dyspnea, and drowsiness. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms ameliorated. Case 3: A 41‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, tachycardia, and dyspnea. Administration was thus discontinued, and she received an H2‒blocker and corticosteroid. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms were alleviated. Case 4: A 50‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing and tachycardia. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms ameliorated. Fosaprepitant did not cause these allergies. The patients in cases 2, 3, and 4 had known allergies to docetaxel, and the cause of allergy in case 4 was unknown. Polysorbate 80, contained in docetaxel, fosaprepitant, and Pro‒NETU, was suspected to be the cause of allergy in cases 1, 2, and 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":"52 9","pages":"677-679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Breast Cancer‒Associated Allergy Caused by Fosnetupitant-A Report of Four Cases].\",\"authors\":\"Masaru Takemae, Yumiko Ishikawa, Tomoka Toyota, Jiro Ando\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We describe the cases of 4 patients with breast cancer who developed an allergy to fosnetupitant (Pro‒NETU). Case 1: A 67‒year‒old woman with breast cancer and bone metastasis received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, tachycardia, and dyspnea. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, the patient's symptoms were alleviated. She experienced no further complaints of such symptoms, and her premedication subsequently excluded Pro‒NETU. Case 2: A 50‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, dyspnea, and drowsiness. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms ameliorated. Case 3: A 41‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, tachycardia, and dyspnea. Administration was thus discontinued, and she received an H2‒blocker and corticosteroid. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms were alleviated. Case 4: A 50‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing and tachycardia. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms ameliorated. Fosaprepitant did not cause these allergies. The patients in cases 2, 3, and 4 had known allergies to docetaxel, and the cause of allergy in case 4 was unknown. Polysorbate 80, contained in docetaxel, fosaprepitant, and Pro‒NETU, was suspected to be the cause of allergy in cases 1, 2, and 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"677-679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们描述了4例乳腺癌患者对氟替吡坦(Pro-NETU)过敏的病例。病例1:一名患有乳腺癌和骨转移的67岁妇女接受了包括Pro-NETU的预用药。用药几分钟后,她主诉潮红、心动过速和呼吸困难。停止给药。停药几分钟后,患者症状减轻。她没有再出现此类症状,她的预用药随后排除了Pro-NETU。病例2:一名患有早期乳腺癌的50岁妇女接受了包括Pro-NETU在内的预用药。服药后几分钟,患者出现脸红、呼吸困难和困倦。停止给药。停药几分钟后,她的症状有所改善。病例3:一名41岁的早期乳腺癌女性接受了包括Pro-NETU在内的预用药。用药几分钟后,她主诉潮红、心动过速和呼吸困难。因此停止给药,她接受h2受体阻滞剂和皮质类固醇。停药几分钟后,她的症状减轻。病例4:一名患有早期乳腺癌的50岁妇女接受了包括Pro-NETU在内的预用药。用药后几分钟,她就开始出现潮红和心动过速。停止给药。停药几分钟后,她的症状有所改善。Fosaprepitant没有引起这些过敏。病例2、3、4均已知对多西紫杉醇过敏,病例4过敏原因不明。在病例1、2和3中,多西紫杉醇、磷沙吡坦和Pro-NETU中含有的聚山梨酯80被怀疑是过敏的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Breast Cancer‒Associated Allergy Caused by Fosnetupitant-A Report of Four Cases].

We describe the cases of 4 patients with breast cancer who developed an allergy to fosnetupitant (Pro‒NETU). Case 1: A 67‒year‒old woman with breast cancer and bone metastasis received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, tachycardia, and dyspnea. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, the patient's symptoms were alleviated. She experienced no further complaints of such symptoms, and her premedication subsequently excluded Pro‒NETU. Case 2: A 50‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, dyspnea, and drowsiness. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms ameliorated. Case 3: A 41‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing, tachycardia, and dyspnea. Administration was thus discontinued, and she received an H2‒blocker and corticosteroid. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms were alleviated. Case 4: A 50‒year‒old woman with early stage breast cancer received premedication that included Pro‒NETU. Minutes after administration, she complained of flushing and tachycardia. Administration was discontinued. Minutes after discontinuation, her symptoms ameliorated. Fosaprepitant did not cause these allergies. The patients in cases 2, 3, and 4 had known allergies to docetaxel, and the cause of allergy in case 4 was unknown. Polysorbate 80, contained in docetaxel, fosaprepitant, and Pro‒NETU, was suspected to be the cause of allergy in cases 1, 2, and 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信