鉴别退行性视网膜裂与视网膜脱离的视网膜影像学选择:范围回顾。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jai Ethan Paris, Carmelo Zak Macri, Yong Min Lee, Weng Onn Chan
{"title":"鉴别退行性视网膜裂与视网膜脱离的视网膜影像学选择:范围回顾。","authors":"Jai Ethan Paris, Carmelo Zak Macri, Yong Min Lee, Weng Onn Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Degenerative retinoschisis (RS) can mimic retinal detachment (RD), posing a diagnostic challenge.We summarixe the utility and limitations of current retinal imaging modalities in evaluating degenerative RS. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 1, 1973, to February 5, 2025. Studies evaluating imaging modalities in degenerative RS were reviewed, including spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), B-scan ultrasound (US), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared reflectance (IR), OCT angiography (OCTA), and color doppler ultrasound (CDUS). Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. SD-OCT remains the most reliable modality, providing high-resolution layer differentiation and detection of schisis-detachment, though its peripheral reach is limited. B-scan ultrasonography and UBM can overcome this limitation and are particularly useful in cases with media opacity. where FAF and IR imaging yield inconsistent and non-reproducible results, limiting their diagnostic utility. CDUS and CEUS may offer additional diagnostic value, particularly in perfusion-based differentiation of RS from RD, though they remain underexplored in schisis-detachment. OCTA is useful in characterising the vascular abnormalities seen in RS; its added B-scan capability may offer advantages over UBM in select cases. We apply the use of different multimodal imaging approaches to cases with diagnostic uncertainty, and apply the use of new imaging options for cases where OCT was unavailable. A multimodal imaging approach is recommended in diagnostically uncertain cases of degenerative RS. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate newer modalities, particularly in schisis-detachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retinal imaging options for differentiating degenerative retinoschisis from retinal detachment: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Jai Ethan Paris, Carmelo Zak Macri, Yong Min Lee, Weng Onn Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Degenerative retinoschisis (RS) can mimic retinal detachment (RD), posing a diagnostic challenge.We summarixe the utility and limitations of current retinal imaging modalities in evaluating degenerative RS. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 1, 1973, to February 5, 2025. Studies evaluating imaging modalities in degenerative RS were reviewed, including spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), B-scan ultrasound (US), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared reflectance (IR), OCT angiography (OCTA), and color doppler ultrasound (CDUS). Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. SD-OCT remains the most reliable modality, providing high-resolution layer differentiation and detection of schisis-detachment, though its peripheral reach is limited. B-scan ultrasonography and UBM can overcome this limitation and are particularly useful in cases with media opacity. where FAF and IR imaging yield inconsistent and non-reproducible results, limiting their diagnostic utility. CDUS and CEUS may offer additional diagnostic value, particularly in perfusion-based differentiation of RS from RD, though they remain underexplored in schisis-detachment. OCTA is useful in characterising the vascular abnormalities seen in RS; its added B-scan capability may offer advantages over UBM in select cases. We apply the use of different multimodal imaging approaches to cases with diagnostic uncertainty, and apply the use of new imaging options for cases where OCT was unavailable. A multimodal imaging approach is recommended in diagnostically uncertain cases of degenerative RS. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate newer modalities, particularly in schisis-detachment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.08.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

退行性视网膜裂(RS)可以模拟视网膜脱离(RD),提出了诊断挑战。我们总结了当前视网膜成像方式在评估退行性视网膜病变中的效用和局限性。我们从1973年1月1日至2025年2月5日对PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar进行了系统检索。综述了退行性RS影像学评价方法的研究,包括光谱域OCT (SD-OCT)、b超(US)、超声生物显微镜(UBM)、眼底自体荧光(FAF)、红外反射(IR)、OCT血管造影(OCTA)和彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)。22项研究符合纳入标准。SD-OCT仍然是最可靠的方式,提供高分辨率的层分化和分离检测,尽管其外围覆盖范围有限。b超扫描和UBM可以克服这一限制,在介质不透明的情况下特别有用。FAF和IR成像产生不一致和不可重复的结果,限制了它们的诊断效用。CDUS和CEUS可能提供额外的诊断价值,特别是在基于灌注的RS和RD分化中,尽管它们在分裂-脱离中的应用尚不充分。OCTA可用于表征RS中的血管异常;在某些情况下,它增加的b扫描功能可能比UBM更有优势。我们将不同的多模态成像方法应用于诊断不确定的病例,并将新的成像方法应用于无法获得OCT的病例。在诊断不确定的退行性RS病例中,推荐采用多模式成像方法。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证新的模式,特别是在裂片-脱离的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retinal imaging options for differentiating degenerative retinoschisis from retinal detachment: A scoping review.

Degenerative retinoschisis (RS) can mimic retinal detachment (RD), posing a diagnostic challenge.We summarixe the utility and limitations of current retinal imaging modalities in evaluating degenerative RS. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from January 1, 1973, to February 5, 2025. Studies evaluating imaging modalities in degenerative RS were reviewed, including spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), B-scan ultrasound (US), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared reflectance (IR), OCT angiography (OCTA), and color doppler ultrasound (CDUS). Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. SD-OCT remains the most reliable modality, providing high-resolution layer differentiation and detection of schisis-detachment, though its peripheral reach is limited. B-scan ultrasonography and UBM can overcome this limitation and are particularly useful in cases with media opacity. where FAF and IR imaging yield inconsistent and non-reproducible results, limiting their diagnostic utility. CDUS and CEUS may offer additional diagnostic value, particularly in perfusion-based differentiation of RS from RD, though they remain underexplored in schisis-detachment. OCTA is useful in characterising the vascular abnormalities seen in RS; its added B-scan capability may offer advantages over UBM in select cases. We apply the use of different multimodal imaging approaches to cases with diagnostic uncertainty, and apply the use of new imaging options for cases where OCT was unavailable. A multimodal imaging approach is recommended in diagnostically uncertain cases of degenerative RS. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate newer modalities, particularly in schisis-detachment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信