Camille Thomé, Adrián Márquez-Moya, Laura Sala-Ayala, Nerea Carreras-Vico, Juan Cuervo-Arango
{"title":"传统卵泡刮削与超声引导下卵泡抽吸对死后切除马卵巢卵母细胞收集量的比较。","authors":"Camille Thomé, Adrián Márquez-Moya, Laura Sala-Ayala, Nerea Carreras-Vico, Juan Cuervo-Arango","doi":"10.1111/rda.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-mortem oocyte collection serves to preserve the genetic material of valuable mares and to obtain recipient oocytes for cloning purposes. Therefore, the number of oocytes retrieved per ovary is a critical factor in increasing the likelihood of obtaining a viable embryo. This study evaluated the efficiency of two post-mortem oocyte retrieval techniques: follicular scraping (Scraping) and ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration (OPU). The comparison was based on several parameters, including the number of follicles aspirated per ovary, oocyte recovery rate (ORR), number of oocytes obtained per ovary, processing time, oocyte searching time, and the volume of medium used. A total of 22 replicates were performed (11 for each group), processing 28 ovaries in the Scraping group and 22 ovaries in the OPU group. Oocytes were searched by the same operator, who was blinded to the treatment group. The results demonstrated that the OPU technique was significantly more efficient than Scraping in most evaluated parameters: number of follicles aspirated per ovary (13.6 ± 3.8 vs. 9.5 ± 3.5), oocytes recovered per ovary (9.1 ± 3.0 vs. 4.7 ± 2.1), processing time per oocyte (1.8 ± 0.8 min vs. 4.1 ± 1.6 min), and ORR (66.7% vs. 50%) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the volume of medium used (19.6 ± 10.4 vs. 21.6 ± 11.0 mL). However, the OPU technique resulted in more denuded oocytes (37.5%) than the Scraping technique (18.6%; p < 0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration yielded a higher number of oocytes per ovary compared to the standard scraping technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":21035,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction in Domestic Animals","volume":"60 10","pages":"e70133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Oocyte Collection Yield Between Conventional Follicle Scraping and Ultrasound-Guided Follicle Aspiration in Postmortem Excised Horse Ovaries.\",\"authors\":\"Camille Thomé, Adrián Márquez-Moya, Laura Sala-Ayala, Nerea Carreras-Vico, Juan Cuervo-Arango\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rda.70133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-mortem oocyte collection serves to preserve the genetic material of valuable mares and to obtain recipient oocytes for cloning purposes. Therefore, the number of oocytes retrieved per ovary is a critical factor in increasing the likelihood of obtaining a viable embryo. This study evaluated the efficiency of two post-mortem oocyte retrieval techniques: follicular scraping (Scraping) and ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration (OPU). The comparison was based on several parameters, including the number of follicles aspirated per ovary, oocyte recovery rate (ORR), number of oocytes obtained per ovary, processing time, oocyte searching time, and the volume of medium used. A total of 22 replicates were performed (11 for each group), processing 28 ovaries in the Scraping group and 22 ovaries in the OPU group. Oocytes were searched by the same operator, who was blinded to the treatment group. The results demonstrated that the OPU technique was significantly more efficient than Scraping in most evaluated parameters: number of follicles aspirated per ovary (13.6 ± 3.8 vs. 9.5 ± 3.5), oocytes recovered per ovary (9.1 ± 3.0 vs. 4.7 ± 2.1), processing time per oocyte (1.8 ± 0.8 min vs. 4.1 ± 1.6 min), and ORR (66.7% vs. 50%) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the volume of medium used (19.6 ± 10.4 vs. 21.6 ± 11.0 mL). However, the OPU technique resulted in more denuded oocytes (37.5%) than the Scraping technique (18.6%; p < 0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration yielded a higher number of oocytes per ovary compared to the standard scraping technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproduction in Domestic Animals\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"e70133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproduction in Domestic Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction in Domestic Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
死后收集卵母细胞是为了保存有价值的母马的遗传物质,并获得用于克隆目的的受体卵母细胞。因此,每个卵巢提取的卵母细胞数量是增加获得活胚胎可能性的关键因素。本研究评估了两种死后卵母细胞回收技术的效率:卵泡刮削(刮削)和超声引导下的卵泡抽吸(OPU)。比较基于几个参数,包括每个卵巢抽吸卵泡数、卵母细胞回收率(ORR)、每个卵巢获得的卵母细胞数、处理时间、卵母细胞搜索时间和所用培养基的体积。共进行22个重复(每组11个),刮痧组加工卵巢28个,OPU组加工卵巢22个。卵母细胞由同一操作人员搜索,该操作人员对治疗组不知情。结果表明,OPU技术在大多数评估参数上都比刮刀技术更有效:每个卵巢抽吸卵泡数(13.6±3.8 vs. 9.5±3.5),每个卵巢回收卵母细胞(9.1±3.0 vs. 4.7±2.1),每个卵母细胞处理时间(1.8±0.8 min vs. 4.1±1.6 min), ORR (66.7% vs. 50%) (p < 0.05)
Comparison of Oocyte Collection Yield Between Conventional Follicle Scraping and Ultrasound-Guided Follicle Aspiration in Postmortem Excised Horse Ovaries.
Post-mortem oocyte collection serves to preserve the genetic material of valuable mares and to obtain recipient oocytes for cloning purposes. Therefore, the number of oocytes retrieved per ovary is a critical factor in increasing the likelihood of obtaining a viable embryo. This study evaluated the efficiency of two post-mortem oocyte retrieval techniques: follicular scraping (Scraping) and ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration (OPU). The comparison was based on several parameters, including the number of follicles aspirated per ovary, oocyte recovery rate (ORR), number of oocytes obtained per ovary, processing time, oocyte searching time, and the volume of medium used. A total of 22 replicates were performed (11 for each group), processing 28 ovaries in the Scraping group and 22 ovaries in the OPU group. Oocytes were searched by the same operator, who was blinded to the treatment group. The results demonstrated that the OPU technique was significantly more efficient than Scraping in most evaluated parameters: number of follicles aspirated per ovary (13.6 ± 3.8 vs. 9.5 ± 3.5), oocytes recovered per ovary (9.1 ± 3.0 vs. 4.7 ± 2.1), processing time per oocyte (1.8 ± 0.8 min vs. 4.1 ± 1.6 min), and ORR (66.7% vs. 50%) (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the volume of medium used (19.6 ± 10.4 vs. 21.6 ± 11.0 mL). However, the OPU technique resulted in more denuded oocytes (37.5%) than the Scraping technique (18.6%; p < 0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration yielded a higher number of oocytes per ovary compared to the standard scraping technique.
期刊介绍:
The journal offers comprehensive information concerning physiology, pathology, and biotechnology of reproduction. Topical results are currently published in original papers, reviews, and short communications with particular attention to investigations on practicable techniques.
Carefully selected reports, e. g. on embryo transfer and associated biotechnologies, gene transfer, and spermatology provide a link between basic research and clinical application. The journal applies to breeders, veterinarians, and biologists, and is also of interest in human medicine. Interdisciplinary cooperation is documented in the proceedings of the joint annual meetings.
Fields of interest: Animal reproduction and biotechnology with special regard to investigations on applied and clinical research.