美国原住民和第一民族人群整形和重建手术护理的差异和障碍。

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007159
Forrest Bohler, Madeline N Pham, Tamara Attisha, James R Burmeister, Kongkrit Chaiyasate
{"title":"美国原住民和第一民族人群整形和重建手术护理的差异和障碍。","authors":"Forrest Bohler, Madeline N Pham, Tamara Attisha, James R Burmeister, Kongkrit Chaiyasate","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>American Indian and Alaska Native and First Nations populations face well-documented health disparities, yet inequities in access to plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) remain underrecognized. These communities experience a higher burden of PRS-relevant conditions, including orofacial clefts, trauma, burns, and postoncological defects, but disproportionately low usage of PRS services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative synthesizes existing literature on disparities in PRS access for Indigenous populations in the United States and Canada. The key focus areas included disease prevalence, barriers to care, and proposed strategies for improving access. Peer-reviewed articles and policy sources were reviewed to identify recurring themes and evidence-based solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indigenous patients face significant barriers to PRS care, including geographic isolation, chronic underfunding of systems such as the Indian Health Service, a shortage of specialized providers in rural regions, socioeconomic hardship, and cultural mistrust rooted in historical trauma. Solutions discussed include expanding telehealth, establishing residency-based domestic outreach programs, supporting short-term training for local providers, and strengthening partnerships between academic institutions and tribal health systems. Increasing Indigenous representation in PRS and promoting tribal self-determination in healthcare are also emphasized as critical components of sustainable change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to address PRS disparities in Indigenous populations must be multifaceted, combining immediate access improvements with long-term investments in workforce development, infrastructure, and culturally attuned care. A coordinated approach among academic programs, policy stakeholders, and Indigenous communities is essential to achieving surgical equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities and Barriers to Care in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery for Native American and First Nations Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Forrest Bohler, Madeline N Pham, Tamara Attisha, James R Burmeister, Kongkrit Chaiyasate\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>American Indian and Alaska Native and First Nations populations face well-documented health disparities, yet inequities in access to plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) remain underrecognized. These communities experience a higher burden of PRS-relevant conditions, including orofacial clefts, trauma, burns, and postoncological defects, but disproportionately low usage of PRS services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative synthesizes existing literature on disparities in PRS access for Indigenous populations in the United States and Canada. The key focus areas included disease prevalence, barriers to care, and proposed strategies for improving access. Peer-reviewed articles and policy sources were reviewed to identify recurring themes and evidence-based solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indigenous patients face significant barriers to PRS care, including geographic isolation, chronic underfunding of systems such as the Indian Health Service, a shortage of specialized providers in rural regions, socioeconomic hardship, and cultural mistrust rooted in historical trauma. Solutions discussed include expanding telehealth, establishing residency-based domestic outreach programs, supporting short-term training for local providers, and strengthening partnerships between academic institutions and tribal health systems. Increasing Indigenous representation in PRS and promoting tribal self-determination in healthcare are also emphasized as critical components of sustainable change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to address PRS disparities in Indigenous populations must be multifaceted, combining immediate access improvements with long-term investments in workforce development, infrastructure, and culturally attuned care. A coordinated approach among academic programs, policy stakeholders, and Indigenous communities is essential to achieving surgical equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"e7159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民和第一民族人口面临着充分记录的健康差距,但在获得整形和重建手术(PRS)方面的不平等仍然没有得到充分认识。这些社区承受着更高的PRS相关疾病负担,包括口面部裂、创伤、烧伤和肿瘤后缺陷,但PRS服务的使用率却不成比例地低。方法:本文综合了有关美国和加拿大土著居民在PRS获取方面的差异的现有文献。重点领域包括疾病流行、获得护理的障碍以及拟议的改善获得服务的战略。审查了同行评议的文章和政策来源,以确定反复出现的主题和基于证据的解决方案。结果:土著患者面临PRS护理的重大障碍,包括地理隔离,长期资金不足的系统,如印度卫生服务,农村地区专业提供者的短缺,社会经济困难,文化不信任根源于历史创伤。讨论的解决方案包括扩大远程医疗、建立以住院为基础的国内外展项目、支持对当地提供者的短期培训以及加强学术机构与部落卫生系统之间的伙伴关系。还强调,增加土著在减贫战略中的代表性和促进部落在保健方面的自决是可持续变革的关键组成部分。结论:解决土著人口PRS差异的努力必须是多方面的,将即时改善获取与劳动力发展、基础设施和文化协调护理方面的长期投资相结合。学术项目、政策利益相关者和土著社区之间的协调方法对于实现手术公平至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities and Barriers to Care in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery for Native American and First Nations Populations.

Background: American Indian and Alaska Native and First Nations populations face well-documented health disparities, yet inequities in access to plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) remain underrecognized. These communities experience a higher burden of PRS-relevant conditions, including orofacial clefts, trauma, burns, and postoncological defects, but disproportionately low usage of PRS services.

Methods: This narrative synthesizes existing literature on disparities in PRS access for Indigenous populations in the United States and Canada. The key focus areas included disease prevalence, barriers to care, and proposed strategies for improving access. Peer-reviewed articles and policy sources were reviewed to identify recurring themes and evidence-based solutions.

Results: Indigenous patients face significant barriers to PRS care, including geographic isolation, chronic underfunding of systems such as the Indian Health Service, a shortage of specialized providers in rural regions, socioeconomic hardship, and cultural mistrust rooted in historical trauma. Solutions discussed include expanding telehealth, establishing residency-based domestic outreach programs, supporting short-term training for local providers, and strengthening partnerships between academic institutions and tribal health systems. Increasing Indigenous representation in PRS and promoting tribal self-determination in healthcare are also emphasized as critical components of sustainable change.

Conclusions: Efforts to address PRS disparities in Indigenous populations must be multifaceted, combining immediate access improvements with long-term investments in workforce development, infrastructure, and culturally attuned care. A coordinated approach among academic programs, policy stakeholders, and Indigenous communities is essential to achieving surgical equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信