Cornelia M Borkhoff, Haris Imsirovic, Imaan Bayoumi, Colin Macarthur, Kimberly M Nurse, Teresa To, Mark Feldman, Eddy Lau, Braden Knight, Catherine S Birken, Jonathon L Maguire, Patricia C Parkin
{"title":"在18个月时进行尼皮辛地区发育筛查。","authors":"Cornelia M Borkhoff, Haris Imsirovic, Imaan Bayoumi, Colin Macarthur, Kimberly M Nurse, Teresa To, Mark Feldman, Eddy Lau, Braden Knight, Catherine S Birken, Jonathon L Maguire, Patricia C Parkin","doi":"10.1093/pch/pxaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Canadian Paediatric Society recommends an enhanced 18-month visit, including the use of a developmental screening tool to stimulate discussion with parents about their child's development, and notes the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) is a widely used tool. We examined the predictive validity of the NDDS in children at average-risk for developmental delay and the association between positive screening and health care utilization (HCU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospective design, parents completed the NDDS at the 18-month primary care visit in Toronto, Canada. Child health insurance number was used to link with health administrative databases to collect HCU data. We calculated screening test properties using later neurodevelopmental consultation as the criterion measure and used multivariable negative binomial regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) for each HCU type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 802 children (mean age 18 months), 35.5% screened NDDS positive. Mean age at follow-up was 8 years, 20 (2.5%) had a neurodevelopmental consultation, and 94 (11.7%) had a special paediatric consultation/assessment, including developmental and/or behavioural care. Screening test properties were: 50% sensitivity (95% CI 27%, 73%), 65% specificity (95% CI 61%, 68%), 35% false positive rate (95% CI 31%, 40%). A positive NDDS was associated with only 1 of 7 HCU types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of the NDDS is inadequate for a developmental screening tool at 18 months, and the false positive rate is unacceptably high. The screening test properties of other widely used developmental screening tools is discussed, noting their low sensitivity, higher specificity, and lower false positive rates.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01869530).</p>","PeriodicalId":19730,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics & child health","volume":"30 6","pages":"477-485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developmental screening at 18 months using the Nipissing District Developmental Screen.\",\"authors\":\"Cornelia M Borkhoff, Haris Imsirovic, Imaan Bayoumi, Colin Macarthur, Kimberly M Nurse, Teresa To, Mark Feldman, Eddy Lau, Braden Knight, Catherine S Birken, Jonathon L Maguire, Patricia C Parkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pch/pxaf023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Canadian Paediatric Society recommends an enhanced 18-month visit, including the use of a developmental screening tool to stimulate discussion with parents about their child's development, and notes the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) is a widely used tool. We examined the predictive validity of the NDDS in children at average-risk for developmental delay and the association between positive screening and health care utilization (HCU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospective design, parents completed the NDDS at the 18-month primary care visit in Toronto, Canada. Child health insurance number was used to link with health administrative databases to collect HCU data. We calculated screening test properties using later neurodevelopmental consultation as the criterion measure and used multivariable negative binomial regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) for each HCU type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 802 children (mean age 18 months), 35.5% screened NDDS positive. Mean age at follow-up was 8 years, 20 (2.5%) had a neurodevelopmental consultation, and 94 (11.7%) had a special paediatric consultation/assessment, including developmental and/or behavioural care. Screening test properties were: 50% sensitivity (95% CI 27%, 73%), 65% specificity (95% CI 61%, 68%), 35% false positive rate (95% CI 31%, 40%). A positive NDDS was associated with only 1 of 7 HCU types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of the NDDS is inadequate for a developmental screening tool at 18 months, and the false positive rate is unacceptably high. The screening test properties of other widely used developmental screening tools is discussed, noting their low sensitivity, higher specificity, and lower false positive rates.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01869530).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatrics & child health\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"477-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495510/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatrics & child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxaf023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics & child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxaf023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:加拿大儿科学会建议加强18个月的随访,包括使用一种发育筛查工具来促进与父母讨论他们孩子的发展,并指出尼皮辛地区发育筛查(NDDS)是一种广泛使用的工具。我们检验了NDDS在发育迟缓平均风险儿童中的预测有效性,以及阳性筛查与医疗保健利用(HCU)之间的关系。方法:采用前瞻性设计,父母在加拿大多伦多18个月的初级保健就诊时完成NDDS。使用儿童健康保险号码与卫生管理数据库连接以收集HCU数据。我们使用后期神经发育咨询作为标准测量来计算筛选试验特性,并使用多变量负二项回归来估计每种HCU类型的调整率比(aRR)。结果:802例儿童(平均年龄18个月)中,35.5%筛查出NDDS阳性。随访时的平均年龄为8岁,20例(2.5%)接受了神经发育咨询,94例(11.7%)接受了特殊的儿科咨询/评估,包括发育和/或行为护理。筛选试验特性为:50%敏感性(95% CI 27%, 73%), 65%特异性(95% CI 61%, 68%), 35%假阳性率(95% CI 31%, 40%)。NDDS阳性仅与7种HCU类型中的1种相关。结论:NDDS的敏感性和特异性不足以作为18月龄发育筛查工具,假阳性率高得令人无法接受。讨论了其他广泛使用的发育筛查工具的筛选试验特性,注意到它们的低灵敏度,高特异性和低假阳性率。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01869530)。
Developmental screening at 18 months using the Nipissing District Developmental Screen.
Objectives: The Canadian Paediatric Society recommends an enhanced 18-month visit, including the use of a developmental screening tool to stimulate discussion with parents about their child's development, and notes the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) is a widely used tool. We examined the predictive validity of the NDDS in children at average-risk for developmental delay and the association between positive screening and health care utilization (HCU).
Methods: Using a prospective design, parents completed the NDDS at the 18-month primary care visit in Toronto, Canada. Child health insurance number was used to link with health administrative databases to collect HCU data. We calculated screening test properties using later neurodevelopmental consultation as the criterion measure and used multivariable negative binomial regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) for each HCU type.
Results: Of 802 children (mean age 18 months), 35.5% screened NDDS positive. Mean age at follow-up was 8 years, 20 (2.5%) had a neurodevelopmental consultation, and 94 (11.7%) had a special paediatric consultation/assessment, including developmental and/or behavioural care. Screening test properties were: 50% sensitivity (95% CI 27%, 73%), 65% specificity (95% CI 61%, 68%), 35% false positive rate (95% CI 31%, 40%). A positive NDDS was associated with only 1 of 7 HCU types.
Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of the NDDS is inadequate for a developmental screening tool at 18 months, and the false positive rate is unacceptably high. The screening test properties of other widely used developmental screening tools is discussed, noting their low sensitivity, higher specificity, and lower false positive rates.
期刊介绍:
Paediatrics & Child Health (PCH) is the official journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and the only peer-reviewed paediatric journal in Canada. Its mission is to advocate for the health and well-being of all Canadian children and youth and to educate child and youth health professionals across the country.
PCH reaches 8,000 paediatricians, family physicians and other child and youth health professionals, as well as ministers and officials in various levels of government who are involved with child and youth health policy in Canada.