Richard W Willy, Kelly Christensen, Brittany Hanser, Marin Plemmons, Brent C Ruby
{"title":"一项横断面实验室研究表明,当行走或跑步时,平均垂直负荷率和胫骨加速度测量并不能有效评估胫骨内部负荷。","authors":"Richard W Willy, Kelly Christensen, Brittany Hanser, Marin Plemmons, Brent C Ruby","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2567781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Valid surrogates are needed to monitor tibial forces during tactical load carriage training. We assessed (a) effects of load carriage on internal tibial forces, average vertical loading rate (AVLR), and peak tibial accelerations; and (b) the relationships among these variables. Walking (1.35 m/s: 0-kg, 20.4-kg, and 34.0-kg) and running (2.7 m/s: 0-kg and 20.4-kg) biomechanics were sampled (n = 34). Peak tibial force increased with load carriage during walking and running (all <i>p < 0.001</i>; <i>F:25.79-371.54</i>). AVLR increased during walking with load carriage (<i>p < 0.001; F = 131.83</i>), with no difference (<i>p = 0.61; F = 0.27)</i> when running with load carriage. Peak tibial accelerations during walking increased with 20.4-kg of load carriage (<i>p < 0.001-0.02</i>). When load carriage was increased to 34.0-kg, small increases were observed for peak positive acceleration (+0.1 g, <i>p = 0.02</i>) only, with no change in peak resultant acceleration (<i>p = 0.99</i>). During running, peak tibial accelerometry surprisingly decreased (<i>p = 0.01-0.04; F = 4.69-7.35)</i> with load carriage. Peak tibial resultant accelerometry was only weakly to moderately associated with peak tibial force during running (<i>r = 0.38-0.52; p = 0.002-0.04</i>); with no other associations between peak tibial force, AVLR, and peak positive tibial acceleration (<i>r = -0.23 - 0.13; p = 0.20-0.92</i>). Thus, AVLR and tibial acceleration are questionable surrogates for internal tibial forces during walking or running, with or without load carriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Average vertical loading rate and tibial accelerometry are not valid assessments of internal tibial loads when walking or running with or without load carriage: A cross-sectional laboratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Richard W Willy, Kelly Christensen, Brittany Hanser, Marin Plemmons, Brent C Ruby\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2567781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Valid surrogates are needed to monitor tibial forces during tactical load carriage training. We assessed (a) effects of load carriage on internal tibial forces, average vertical loading rate (AVLR), and peak tibial accelerations; and (b) the relationships among these variables. Walking (1.35 m/s: 0-kg, 20.4-kg, and 34.0-kg) and running (2.7 m/s: 0-kg and 20.4-kg) biomechanics were sampled (n = 34). Peak tibial force increased with load carriage during walking and running (all <i>p < 0.001</i>; <i>F:25.79-371.54</i>). AVLR increased during walking with load carriage (<i>p < 0.001; F = 131.83</i>), with no difference (<i>p = 0.61; F = 0.27)</i> when running with load carriage. Peak tibial accelerations during walking increased with 20.4-kg of load carriage (<i>p < 0.001-0.02</i>). When load carriage was increased to 34.0-kg, small increases were observed for peak positive acceleration (+0.1 g, <i>p = 0.02</i>) only, with no change in peak resultant acceleration (<i>p = 0.99</i>). During running, peak tibial accelerometry surprisingly decreased (<i>p = 0.01-0.04; F = 4.69-7.35)</i> with load carriage. Peak tibial resultant accelerometry was only weakly to moderately associated with peak tibial force during running (<i>r = 0.38-0.52; p = 0.002-0.04</i>); with no other associations between peak tibial force, AVLR, and peak positive tibial acceleration (<i>r = -0.23 - 0.13; p = 0.20-0.92</i>). Thus, AVLR and tibial acceleration are questionable surrogates for internal tibial forces during walking or running, with or without load carriage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2567781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2567781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在战术负重训练中,需要有效的替代物来监测胫骨力。我们评估了(a)荷载承载对胫骨内力、平均垂直载荷率(AVLR)和胫骨峰值加速度的影响;(b)这些变量之间的关系。步行(1.35 m/s: 0-kg, 20.4 kg和34.0 kg)和跑步(2.7 m/s: 0-kg和20.4 kg)的生物力学样本(n = 34)。步行和跑步时,峰值胫骨力随负重增加而增加(p; F:25.79-371.54)。负重行走时AVLR升高(p),负重跑步时AVLR无差异(p = 0.61; F = 0.27)。行走时胫骨峰值加速度随负重20.4 kg的增加而增加(p)。当载重量增加到34.0 kg时,仅观察到峰值正加速度的小幅增加(+0.1 g, p = 0.02),峰值最终加速度没有变化(p = 0.99)。在跑步过程中,胫骨加速度峰值随负重的增加而显著降低(p = 0.01-0.04; F = 4.69-7.35)。胫骨合成加速度峰值与跑步时胫骨力峰值仅弱至中度相关(r = 0.38-0.52; p = 0.002-0.04);胫骨峰值力、AVLR和胫骨峰值正加速度之间没有其他关联(r = -0.23 - 0.13; p = 0.20-0.92)。因此,在步行或跑步时,无论是否负重,AVLR和胫骨加速度都是值得怀疑的胫骨内力替代物。
Average vertical loading rate and tibial accelerometry are not valid assessments of internal tibial loads when walking or running with or without load carriage: A cross-sectional laboratory study.
Valid surrogates are needed to monitor tibial forces during tactical load carriage training. We assessed (a) effects of load carriage on internal tibial forces, average vertical loading rate (AVLR), and peak tibial accelerations; and (b) the relationships among these variables. Walking (1.35 m/s: 0-kg, 20.4-kg, and 34.0-kg) and running (2.7 m/s: 0-kg and 20.4-kg) biomechanics were sampled (n = 34). Peak tibial force increased with load carriage during walking and running (all p < 0.001; F:25.79-371.54). AVLR increased during walking with load carriage (p < 0.001; F = 131.83), with no difference (p = 0.61; F = 0.27) when running with load carriage. Peak tibial accelerations during walking increased with 20.4-kg of load carriage (p < 0.001-0.02). When load carriage was increased to 34.0-kg, small increases were observed for peak positive acceleration (+0.1 g, p = 0.02) only, with no change in peak resultant acceleration (p = 0.99). During running, peak tibial accelerometry surprisingly decreased (p = 0.01-0.04; F = 4.69-7.35) with load carriage. Peak tibial resultant accelerometry was only weakly to moderately associated with peak tibial force during running (r = 0.38-0.52; p = 0.002-0.04); with no other associations between peak tibial force, AVLR, and peak positive tibial acceleration (r = -0.23 - 0.13; p = 0.20-0.92). Thus, AVLR and tibial acceleration are questionable surrogates for internal tibial forces during walking or running, with or without load carriage.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.