弹性组合:促进性别多样化青年福祉的优势。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Edith Paré-Roy, Kevin Smith, Martine Hébert
{"title":"弹性组合:促进性别多样化青年福祉的优势。","authors":"Edith Paré-Roy, Kevin Smith, Martine Hébert","doi":"10.1177/08862605251376340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexually diverse youth (SDY), including lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and pansexual youth, face significant challenges, being nearly three times more likely to experience victimization compared to their heterosexual peers. Among SDY, bisexual youth are at higher risk of interpersonal violence than gay youth. It is well documented that interpersonal violence can lead to serious consequences for SDY, such as depression and trauma symptoms. However, the outcomes associated with victimization are heterogeneous, and some youth appear to fare better despite adversity. This study aimed to explore the strengths that help SDY navigate their challenges and contribute to their well-being. An online survey was conducted, and 4,122 youth aged 14 to 25, including 251 gay youth and 585 bisexual youth, completed measures of victimization and indicators derived from the Resilience Portfolio Model: Scales for Youth. This study compared victimization rates, level of trauma symptoms, and level of well-being of gay youth, bisexual youth, and heterosexual youth using ANOVAs. Multiple linear regressions were then conducted to identify the strengths associated with well-being among youth according to their sexual orientation. SDY had a higher level of trauma symptoms and a lower level of well-being than heterosexual youth. SDY also had fewer strengths that promote resilience than heterosexual youth. Notably, purpose stood out as the most significant predictor of well-being among all sexual orientations. Practitioners working with SDY could assist them in developing strengths-especially a sense of purpose-to build their resilience and enhance their well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605251376340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience Portfolio: Strengths Promoting Well-Being in Sexually Diverse Youth.\",\"authors\":\"Edith Paré-Roy, Kevin Smith, Martine Hébert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251376340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sexually diverse youth (SDY), including lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and pansexual youth, face significant challenges, being nearly three times more likely to experience victimization compared to their heterosexual peers. Among SDY, bisexual youth are at higher risk of interpersonal violence than gay youth. It is well documented that interpersonal violence can lead to serious consequences for SDY, such as depression and trauma symptoms. However, the outcomes associated with victimization are heterogeneous, and some youth appear to fare better despite adversity. This study aimed to explore the strengths that help SDY navigate their challenges and contribute to their well-being. An online survey was conducted, and 4,122 youth aged 14 to 25, including 251 gay youth and 585 bisexual youth, completed measures of victimization and indicators derived from the Resilience Portfolio Model: Scales for Youth. This study compared victimization rates, level of trauma symptoms, and level of well-being of gay youth, bisexual youth, and heterosexual youth using ANOVAs. Multiple linear regressions were then conducted to identify the strengths associated with well-being among youth according to their sexual orientation. SDY had a higher level of trauma symptoms and a lower level of well-being than heterosexual youth. SDY also had fewer strengths that promote resilience than heterosexual youth. Notably, purpose stood out as the most significant predictor of well-being among all sexual orientations. Practitioners working with SDY could assist them in developing strengths-especially a sense of purpose-to build their resilience and enhance their well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8862605251376340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251376340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251376340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性多样性青年(SDY),包括女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、酷儿和泛性恋青年,面临着重大挑战,与异性恋同龄人相比,他们遭受伤害的可能性几乎是其三倍。在SDY中,双性恋青年比同性恋青年有更高的人际暴力风险。有充分证据表明,人际暴力可导致SDY的严重后果,如抑郁和创伤症状。然而,与受害相关的结果是不同的,一些年轻人在逆境中表现得更好。本研究旨在探索帮助SDY应对挑战并为他们的幸福做出贡献的优势。通过一项在线调查,4122名年龄在14至25岁之间的青年,包括251名同性恋青年和585名双性恋青年,完成了受害测量和来自弹性组合模型的指标:青年量表。本研究使用方差分析比较了同性恋青年、双性恋青年和异性恋青年的受害率、创伤症状水平和幸福水平。然后进行多元线性回归,根据青少年的性取向来确定与幸福感相关的优势。与异性恋青年相比,SDY有更高水平的创伤症状和更低水平的幸福感。与异性恋青年相比,SDY在促进心理弹性方面的优势也更少。值得注意的是,在所有性取向中,目的是最重要的幸福预测因素。与SDY一起工作的从业者可以帮助他们发展优势,尤其是目标感,以建立他们的适应能力和提高他们的幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience Portfolio: Strengths Promoting Well-Being in Sexually Diverse Youth.

Sexually diverse youth (SDY), including lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and pansexual youth, face significant challenges, being nearly three times more likely to experience victimization compared to their heterosexual peers. Among SDY, bisexual youth are at higher risk of interpersonal violence than gay youth. It is well documented that interpersonal violence can lead to serious consequences for SDY, such as depression and trauma symptoms. However, the outcomes associated with victimization are heterogeneous, and some youth appear to fare better despite adversity. This study aimed to explore the strengths that help SDY navigate their challenges and contribute to their well-being. An online survey was conducted, and 4,122 youth aged 14 to 25, including 251 gay youth and 585 bisexual youth, completed measures of victimization and indicators derived from the Resilience Portfolio Model: Scales for Youth. This study compared victimization rates, level of trauma symptoms, and level of well-being of gay youth, bisexual youth, and heterosexual youth using ANOVAs. Multiple linear regressions were then conducted to identify the strengths associated with well-being among youth according to their sexual orientation. SDY had a higher level of trauma symptoms and a lower level of well-being than heterosexual youth. SDY also had fewer strengths that promote resilience than heterosexual youth. Notably, purpose stood out as the most significant predictor of well-being among all sexual orientations. Practitioners working with SDY could assist them in developing strengths-especially a sense of purpose-to build their resilience and enhance their well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信