宫颈龋齿病变的修复和粘附策略:系统综述,配对和网络荟萃分析。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alain Manuel Chaple Gil, Laura Pereda Vázquez, Meylin Santiesteban Velázquez, Lazareth Liz Ortiz Santiago
{"title":"宫颈龋齿病变的修复和粘附策略:系统综述,配对和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Alain Manuel Chaple Gil, Laura Pereda Vázquez, Meylin Santiesteban Velázquez, Lazareth Liz Ortiz Santiago","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical lesions often demand specialized approaches due to their anatomical position, and the effectiveness of these techniques may vary among clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the clinical effectiveness of various adhesive strategies combined with different restorative materials for managing cavitated cervical carious lesions in adults, with a specific focus on restoration retention. The study also aimed to rank these combinations through network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Randomized controlled trials comparing at least two restorative protocols in adult populations were included. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the CINeMA framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Conventional composites applied with two-step etch and rinse adhesives and compomers demonstrated the highest retention rates in pairwise comparisons. Glass ionomer cement showed the most stable long-term performance. However, the network meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among treatments. Notably, compomers ranked highest in overall performance but were supported by studies with substantial heterogeneity and a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although compomers achieved the highest retention rates in direct comparisons, the underlying evidence is limited by methodological concerns, reducing confidence in their clinical reliability. In contrast, conventional composites bonded with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives emerged as the most robust and evidence-based option for restoring cervical carious lesions. The optimization of adhesive protocols, particularly the incorporation of selective enamel etching, remains a key determinant for long-term restoration success.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis provides robust, evidence-based guidance for the restoration of cavitated cervical carious lesions in adults. Optimizing adhesive protocols, especially with selective enamel etching, significantly enhances the longevity of cervical carious lesion restorations. Evidence supports two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives with conventional composites as a dependable choice, ensuring durable retention, favorable esthetic integration, and long-term performance in this highly visible and esthetically sensitive region of the dentition.</p><p><strong>Prospero: </strong>Registration number: CRD420251083691.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorative and Adhesive Strategies for Cervical Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review, Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alain Manuel Chaple Gil, Laura Pereda Vázquez, Meylin Santiesteban Velázquez, Lazareth Liz Ortiz Santiago\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical lesions often demand specialized approaches due to their anatomical position, and the effectiveness of these techniques may vary among clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the clinical effectiveness of various adhesive strategies combined with different restorative materials for managing cavitated cervical carious lesions in adults, with a specific focus on restoration retention. The study also aimed to rank these combinations through network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Randomized controlled trials comparing at least two restorative protocols in adult populations were included. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the CINeMA framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Conventional composites applied with two-step etch and rinse adhesives and compomers demonstrated the highest retention rates in pairwise comparisons. Glass ionomer cement showed the most stable long-term performance. However, the network meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among treatments. Notably, compomers ranked highest in overall performance but were supported by studies with substantial heterogeneity and a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although compomers achieved the highest retention rates in direct comparisons, the underlying evidence is limited by methodological concerns, reducing confidence in their clinical reliability. In contrast, conventional composites bonded with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives emerged as the most robust and evidence-based option for restoring cervical carious lesions. The optimization of adhesive protocols, particularly the incorporation of selective enamel etching, remains a key determinant for long-term restoration success.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis provides robust, evidence-based guidance for the restoration of cavitated cervical carious lesions in adults. Optimizing adhesive protocols, especially with selective enamel etching, significantly enhances the longevity of cervical carious lesion restorations. Evidence supports two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives with conventional composites as a dependable choice, ensuring durable retention, favorable esthetic integration, and long-term performance in this highly visible and esthetically sensitive region of the dentition.</p><p><strong>Prospero: </strong>Registration number: CRD420251083691.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:由于颈椎病变的解剖位置,通常需要专门的方法,这些技术的有效性可能因临床医生而异。目的:评估不同粘接剂策略结合不同修复材料治疗成人空腔性宫颈病变的临床效果,并特别关注修复体的固位。该研究还旨在通过网络元分析对这些组合进行排名。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并在PROSPERO注册。纳入了比较至少两种成人恢复性治疗方案的随机对照试验。使用随机效应模型进行两两和网络meta分析。使用CINeMA框架评估证据的确定性。结果:17项rct符合纳入标准。采用两步蚀刻和漂洗粘合剂和复合剂的传统复合材料在两两比较中显示出最高的保留率。玻璃离子水泥表现出最稳定的长期性能。然而,网络荟萃分析显示治疗之间没有统计学上的显著差异。值得注意的是,作曲者在整体表现上排名最高,但得到了大量异质性和高偏倚风险研究的支持。结论:尽管在直接比较中,混合剂获得了最高的保留率,但潜在的证据受到方法学问题的限制,降低了对其临床可靠性的信心。相比之下,传统复合材料结合两步蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂成为修复宫颈龋齿病变的最可靠和基于证据的选择。粘接剂方案的优化,特别是结合选择性牙釉质蚀刻,仍然是长期修复成功的关键决定因素。临床意义:本系统综述和网络荟萃分析为成人空腔性宫颈病变的修复提供了强有力的循证指导。优化黏合剂方案,特别是选择性牙釉质蚀刻,可显著提高宫颈龋病修复的寿命。证据支持两步蚀刻-冲洗胶粘剂与传统复合材料作为可靠的选择,确保持久的保留,良好的美学整合,长期性能在这个高度可见和审美敏感的牙列区域。普洛斯彼罗:注册号:CRD420251083691。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restorative and Adhesive Strategies for Cervical Carious Lesions: A Systematic Review, Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Cervical lesions often demand specialized approaches due to their anatomical position, and the effectiveness of these techniques may vary among clinicians.

Objectives: To assess the clinical effectiveness of various adhesive strategies combined with different restorative materials for managing cavitated cervical carious lesions in adults, with a specific focus on restoration retention. The study also aimed to rank these combinations through network meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Randomized controlled trials comparing at least two restorative protocols in adult populations were included. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the CINeMA framework.

Results: Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Conventional composites applied with two-step etch and rinse adhesives and compomers demonstrated the highest retention rates in pairwise comparisons. Glass ionomer cement showed the most stable long-term performance. However, the network meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among treatments. Notably, compomers ranked highest in overall performance but were supported by studies with substantial heterogeneity and a high risk of bias.

Conclusions: Although compomers achieved the highest retention rates in direct comparisons, the underlying evidence is limited by methodological concerns, reducing confidence in their clinical reliability. In contrast, conventional composites bonded with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives emerged as the most robust and evidence-based option for restoring cervical carious lesions. The optimization of adhesive protocols, particularly the incorporation of selective enamel etching, remains a key determinant for long-term restoration success.

Clinical significance: This systematic review and network meta-analysis provides robust, evidence-based guidance for the restoration of cavitated cervical carious lesions in adults. Optimizing adhesive protocols, especially with selective enamel etching, significantly enhances the longevity of cervical carious lesion restorations. Evidence supports two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives with conventional composites as a dependable choice, ensuring durable retention, favorable esthetic integration, and long-term performance in this highly visible and esthetically sensitive region of the dentition.

Prospero: Registration number: CRD420251083691.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信