美国住院成人烧伤病因学的地区差异。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
E S Blake, A E Kurth, J M Dougherty, C J Rittle, Z Fan Mph, Hemmila, N F Sangji
{"title":"美国住院成人烧伤病因学的地区差异。","authors":"E S Blake, A E Kurth, J M Dougherty, C J Rittle, Z Fan Mph, Hemmila, N F Sangji","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite known regional variation in access to specialized burn centers, the differences in burn injury patterns across the United States have not been well described. We investigated the geographic variation in burn injury etiology across the United States. A retrospective cohort study of burn injury was conducted with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2017-2020. ICD 10-CM codes were used to identify burn patients and etiology of injury. Demographics, including median household income quartile across regions, were also identified. The proportion of patients who sustained chemical burns (29.9 people per million population) and electrical burns (29.8 people per million population) was significantly higher in the South compared to other regions in the US (at 4.7% and 4.8% of all inpatient burn admissions, respectively), despite the region's relative scarcity of burn centers. The South also had the highest proportion of self-pay patients, at 15.8%, compared to other regions, while also having the highest proportion of lower income patients. These differences have implications for policy decisions concerning resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional differences in inpatient adult burn Etiology across the United States.\",\"authors\":\"E S Blake, A E Kurth, J M Dougherty, C J Rittle, Z Fan Mph, Hemmila, N F Sangji\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite known regional variation in access to specialized burn centers, the differences in burn injury patterns across the United States have not been well described. We investigated the geographic variation in burn injury etiology across the United States. A retrospective cohort study of burn injury was conducted with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2017-2020. ICD 10-CM codes were used to identify burn patients and etiology of injury. Demographics, including median household income quartile across regions, were also identified. The proportion of patients who sustained chemical burns (29.9 people per million population) and electrical burns (29.8 people per million population) was significantly higher in the South compared to other regions in the US (at 4.7% and 4.8% of all inpatient burn admissions, respectively), despite the region's relative scarcity of burn centers. The South also had the highest proportion of self-pay patients, at 15.8%, compared to other regions, while also having the highest proportion of lower income patients. These differences have implications for policy decisions concerning resource allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在进入专业烧伤中心方面存在已知的区域差异,但美国各地烧伤模式的差异尚未得到很好的描述。我们调查了美国各地烧伤病因学的地理差异。采用2017-2020年医疗成本与利用项目-全国住院患者样本(HCUP-NIS)数据对烧伤患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用ICD 10-CM代码识别烧伤患者和损伤的病因。还确定了人口统计数据,包括各地区家庭收入中位数。尽管该地区烧伤中心相对稀缺,但与美国其他地区相比,南方遭受化学烧伤(每百万人29.9人)和电烧伤(每百万人29.8人)的患者比例明显更高(分别占所有烧伤住院患者的4.7%和4.8%)。与其他地区相比,南方自费患者的比例也最高,为15.8%,同时低收入患者的比例也最高。这些差异对有关资源分配的政策决定有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional differences in inpatient adult burn Etiology across the United States.

Despite known regional variation in access to specialized burn centers, the differences in burn injury patterns across the United States have not been well described. We investigated the geographic variation in burn injury etiology across the United States. A retrospective cohort study of burn injury was conducted with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2017-2020. ICD 10-CM codes were used to identify burn patients and etiology of injury. Demographics, including median household income quartile across regions, were also identified. The proportion of patients who sustained chemical burns (29.9 people per million population) and electrical burns (29.8 people per million population) was significantly higher in the South compared to other regions in the US (at 4.7% and 4.8% of all inpatient burn admissions, respectively), despite the region's relative scarcity of burn centers. The South also had the highest proportion of self-pay patients, at 15.8%, compared to other regions, while also having the highest proportion of lower income patients. These differences have implications for policy decisions concerning resource allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信