E S Blake, A E Kurth, J M Dougherty, C J Rittle, Z Fan Mph, Hemmila, N F Sangji
{"title":"美国住院成人烧伤病因学的地区差异。","authors":"E S Blake, A E Kurth, J M Dougherty, C J Rittle, Z Fan Mph, Hemmila, N F Sangji","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite known regional variation in access to specialized burn centers, the differences in burn injury patterns across the United States have not been well described. We investigated the geographic variation in burn injury etiology across the United States. A retrospective cohort study of burn injury was conducted with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2017-2020. ICD 10-CM codes were used to identify burn patients and etiology of injury. Demographics, including median household income quartile across regions, were also identified. The proportion of patients who sustained chemical burns (29.9 people per million population) and electrical burns (29.8 people per million population) was significantly higher in the South compared to other regions in the US (at 4.7% and 4.8% of all inpatient burn admissions, respectively), despite the region's relative scarcity of burn centers. The South also had the highest proportion of self-pay patients, at 15.8%, compared to other regions, while also having the highest proportion of lower income patients. These differences have implications for policy decisions concerning resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional differences in inpatient adult burn Etiology across the United States.\",\"authors\":\"E S Blake, A E Kurth, J M Dougherty, C J Rittle, Z Fan Mph, Hemmila, N F Sangji\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite known regional variation in access to specialized burn centers, the differences in burn injury patterns across the United States have not been well described. We investigated the geographic variation in burn injury etiology across the United States. A retrospective cohort study of burn injury was conducted with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2017-2020. ICD 10-CM codes were used to identify burn patients and etiology of injury. Demographics, including median household income quartile across regions, were also identified. The proportion of patients who sustained chemical burns (29.9 people per million population) and electrical burns (29.8 people per million population) was significantly higher in the South compared to other regions in the US (at 4.7% and 4.8% of all inpatient burn admissions, respectively), despite the region's relative scarcity of burn centers. The South also had the highest proportion of self-pay patients, at 15.8%, compared to other regions, while also having the highest proportion of lower income patients. These differences have implications for policy decisions concerning resource allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regional differences in inpatient adult burn Etiology across the United States.
Despite known regional variation in access to specialized burn centers, the differences in burn injury patterns across the United States have not been well described. We investigated the geographic variation in burn injury etiology across the United States. A retrospective cohort study of burn injury was conducted with Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2017-2020. ICD 10-CM codes were used to identify burn patients and etiology of injury. Demographics, including median household income quartile across regions, were also identified. The proportion of patients who sustained chemical burns (29.9 people per million population) and electrical burns (29.8 people per million population) was significantly higher in the South compared to other regions in the US (at 4.7% and 4.8% of all inpatient burn admissions, respectively), despite the region's relative scarcity of burn centers. The South also had the highest proportion of self-pay patients, at 15.8%, compared to other regions, while also having the highest proportion of lower income patients. These differences have implications for policy decisions concerning resource allocation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.