{"title":"基于自动乳腺体积扫描图像的深度学习诊断乳腺病变:一项多中心诊断研究。","authors":"Hui Liu, Ying Zhang, Bin Tan, Yi-Fei Yin, Li-Xia Yan, Li-Hua Xiang, Dan-Dan Shan, Yun-Yao Zhang, Shi-Si Ding, Guang Xu, Bo-Yang Zhou, Yi-Lei Shi, Xiao-Xiang Zhu, Jing-Liang Hu, Li-Ping Sun, Hui-Xiong Xu, Yi-Feng Zhang","doi":"10.7150/ijms.118430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To develop a deep learning (DL) model for the automated detection and diagnosis of breast cancer utilizing automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) images, and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of radiologists in screening ABVS examinations. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter diagnostic study, ABVS data from 1,368 patients with breast lesions were collected across three hospitals between November 2019 and April 2024. The DL model (VGG19, DenseNet161, ResNet101, and ResNet50) was developed to detect and classify lesions. One-tenth of the cases from Hospital A were randomly selected as a fixed internal test set; the remaining data were randomly divided into training and validation sets at an 8:2 ratio. External test sets were derived from Hospitals B and C. Pathological findings served as the gold standard. Clinical applicability was assessed by comparing radiologists' diagnostic performance with and without DL model assistance. <b>Results:</b> For breast cancer detection, the DL model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.984 (95% CI: 0.965-0.995) on the internal test set, 0.978 (95% CI: 0.951-0.994) on the external test set 1 (Hospital B), and 0.942 (95% CI: 0.902-0.978) on the external test set 2 (Hospital C). The model demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (98.2%) and specificity (90.3%) than junior radiologists (P < 0.05), while exhibiting comparable diagnostic reliability and accuracy to senior radiologists. Interpretation time was significantly reduced for all radiologists when using the DL model (P < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> The DL model based on ABVS images significantly enhanced diagnostic performance and reduced interpretation time, particularly benefiting junior radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 15","pages":"3924-3937"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Based on Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Liu, Ying Zhang, Bin Tan, Yi-Fei Yin, Li-Xia Yan, Li-Hua Xiang, Dan-Dan Shan, Yun-Yao Zhang, Shi-Si Ding, Guang Xu, Bo-Yang Zhou, Yi-Lei Shi, Xiao-Xiang Zhu, Jing-Liang Hu, Li-Ping Sun, Hui-Xiong Xu, Yi-Feng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/ijms.118430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To develop a deep learning (DL) model for the automated detection and diagnosis of breast cancer utilizing automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) images, and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of radiologists in screening ABVS examinations. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter diagnostic study, ABVS data from 1,368 patients with breast lesions were collected across three hospitals between November 2019 and April 2024. The DL model (VGG19, DenseNet161, ResNet101, and ResNet50) was developed to detect and classify lesions. One-tenth of the cases from Hospital A were randomly selected as a fixed internal test set; the remaining data were randomly divided into training and validation sets at an 8:2 ratio. External test sets were derived from Hospitals B and C. Pathological findings served as the gold standard. Clinical applicability was assessed by comparing radiologists' diagnostic performance with and without DL model assistance. <b>Results:</b> For breast cancer detection, the DL model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.984 (95% CI: 0.965-0.995) on the internal test set, 0.978 (95% CI: 0.951-0.994) on the external test set 1 (Hospital B), and 0.942 (95% CI: 0.902-0.978) on the external test set 2 (Hospital C). The model demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (98.2%) and specificity (90.3%) than junior radiologists (P < 0.05), while exhibiting comparable diagnostic reliability and accuracy to senior radiologists. Interpretation time was significantly reduced for all radiologists when using the DL model (P < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> The DL model based on ABVS images significantly enhanced diagnostic performance and reduced interpretation time, particularly benefiting junior radiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"22 15\",\"pages\":\"3924-3937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.118430\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.118430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep Learning Based on Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.
Objectives: To develop a deep learning (DL) model for the automated detection and diagnosis of breast cancer utilizing automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) images, and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of radiologists in screening ABVS examinations. Methods: In this multicenter diagnostic study, ABVS data from 1,368 patients with breast lesions were collected across three hospitals between November 2019 and April 2024. The DL model (VGG19, DenseNet161, ResNet101, and ResNet50) was developed to detect and classify lesions. One-tenth of the cases from Hospital A were randomly selected as a fixed internal test set; the remaining data were randomly divided into training and validation sets at an 8:2 ratio. External test sets were derived from Hospitals B and C. Pathological findings served as the gold standard. Clinical applicability was assessed by comparing radiologists' diagnostic performance with and without DL model assistance. Results: For breast cancer detection, the DL model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.984 (95% CI: 0.965-0.995) on the internal test set, 0.978 (95% CI: 0.951-0.994) on the external test set 1 (Hospital B), and 0.942 (95% CI: 0.902-0.978) on the external test set 2 (Hospital C). The model demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (98.2%) and specificity (90.3%) than junior radiologists (P < 0.05), while exhibiting comparable diagnostic reliability and accuracy to senior radiologists. Interpretation time was significantly reduced for all radiologists when using the DL model (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The DL model based on ABVS images significantly enhanced diagnostic performance and reduced interpretation time, particularly benefiting junior radiologists.
期刊介绍:
Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.