初产妇硬膜外镇痛与会阴损伤之间的关系:一项倾向评分匹配的队列研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Omri Dominsky, Emmanuel Attali, Uri Amikam, Ronen Gold, Chaim Greenberger, Yariv Yogev, Yoav Baruch
{"title":"初产妇硬膜外镇痛与会阴损伤之间的关系:一项倾向评分匹配的队列研究。","authors":"Omri Dominsky, Emmanuel Attali, Uri Amikam, Ronen Gold, Chaim Greenberger, Yariv Yogev, Yoav Baruch","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury, including obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), in primiparous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with singleton, term, vertex, and vaginal deliveries between 2012 and 2024 at a tertiary medical center. Primary outcomes were (1) any perineal injury, and (2) OASI. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for maternal and obstetric confounders. Perineal outcomes were compared in matched and unmatched cohorts using standardized mean difference (SMD). An SMD <0.1 was considered negligible, 0.1-0.2 small, and >0.2 clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between epidural use and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 45 132 women were included, of whom 36 799 (81.5%) received epidural analgesia. After matching (n = 5974 per group), baseline characteristics were balanced apart from fetal head station at full dilation, which was higher in the no-epidural group (0.90 ± 0.9 vs. 0.66 ± 0.8; SMD = 0.239). Perineal injury occurred more often with epidural with a marginal difference (82.2% vs. 78.2%, SMD = 0.10). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, epidural was associated with more perineal injury only in the absence of episiotomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.225-1.425; P < 0.001), but not when episiotomy was performed. Conversely, epidural use was associated with lower OASI risk regardless of whether episiotomy was performed (aOR 0.492; 95% CI: 0.285-0.849; P = 0.011) or not (aOR 0.592; 95% CI: 0.424-0.825; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In primiparous term vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia modestly increased low-grade perineal tears but reduced OASI risk, supporting its safety regarding severe perineal trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury in primiparous women: A propensity score-matched cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Omri Dominsky, Emmanuel Attali, Uri Amikam, Ronen Gold, Chaim Greenberger, Yariv Yogev, Yoav Baruch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury, including obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), in primiparous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with singleton, term, vertex, and vaginal deliveries between 2012 and 2024 at a tertiary medical center. Primary outcomes were (1) any perineal injury, and (2) OASI. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for maternal and obstetric confounders. Perineal outcomes were compared in matched and unmatched cohorts using standardized mean difference (SMD). An SMD <0.1 was considered negligible, 0.1-0.2 small, and >0.2 clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between epidural use and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 45 132 women were included, of whom 36 799 (81.5%) received epidural analgesia. After matching (n = 5974 per group), baseline characteristics were balanced apart from fetal head station at full dilation, which was higher in the no-epidural group (0.90 ± 0.9 vs. 0.66 ± 0.8; SMD = 0.239). Perineal injury occurred more often with epidural with a marginal difference (82.2% vs. 78.2%, SMD = 0.10). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, epidural was associated with more perineal injury only in the absence of episiotomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.225-1.425; P < 0.001), but not when episiotomy was performed. Conversely, epidural use was associated with lower OASI risk regardless of whether episiotomy was performed (aOR 0.492; 95% CI: 0.285-0.849; P = 0.011) or not (aOR 0.592; 95% CI: 0.424-0.825; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In primiparous term vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia modestly increased low-grade perineal tears but reduced OASI risk, supporting its safety regarding severe perineal trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨初产妇硬膜外镇痛与会阴损伤的关系,包括产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)。方法:我们对2012年至2024年间在某三级医疗中心分娩的单胎、足月分娩、顶点分娩和阴道分娩的初产妇进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结局为(1)会阴损伤;(2)OASI。倾向评分匹配(1:1)用于调整产妇和产科混杂因素。使用标准化平均差(SMD)比较配对和未配对队列的会阴结局。smd0.2有临床意义。多变量逻辑回归用于评估硬膜外使用与预后之间的关系。结果:共纳入45132名妇女,其中36799名(81.5%)接受硬膜外镇痛。匹配后(n = 5974 /组),除了完全扩张时的胎头位置外,基线特征平衡,无硬膜外组更高(0.90±0.9 vs 0.66±0.8;SMD = 0.239)。会阴损伤多发于硬膜外,差异有统计学意义(82.2% vs. 78.2%, SMD = 0.10)。在一项多变量logistic回归分析中,仅在没有外阴切开术的情况下,硬膜外镇痛与更多的会阴损伤相关(调整优势比[aOR] 1.321; 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.225-1.425; P结论:在初产阴道分娩中,硬膜外镇痛适度增加轻度会阴撕裂,但降低OASI风险,支持其对严重会阴创伤的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury in primiparous women: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

Objective: To determine the association between epidural analgesia and perineal injury, including obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), in primiparous women.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with singleton, term, vertex, and vaginal deliveries between 2012 and 2024 at a tertiary medical center. Primary outcomes were (1) any perineal injury, and (2) OASI. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for maternal and obstetric confounders. Perineal outcomes were compared in matched and unmatched cohorts using standardized mean difference (SMD). An SMD <0.1 was considered negligible, 0.1-0.2 small, and >0.2 clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between epidural use and outcomes.

Results: Overall, 45 132 women were included, of whom 36 799 (81.5%) received epidural analgesia. After matching (n = 5974 per group), baseline characteristics were balanced apart from fetal head station at full dilation, which was higher in the no-epidural group (0.90 ± 0.9 vs. 0.66 ± 0.8; SMD = 0.239). Perineal injury occurred more often with epidural with a marginal difference (82.2% vs. 78.2%, SMD = 0.10). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, epidural was associated with more perineal injury only in the absence of episiotomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.225-1.425; P < 0.001), but not when episiotomy was performed. Conversely, epidural use was associated with lower OASI risk regardless of whether episiotomy was performed (aOR 0.492; 95% CI: 0.285-0.849; P = 0.011) or not (aOR 0.592; 95% CI: 0.424-0.825; P = 0.002).

Conclusion: In primiparous term vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia modestly increased low-grade perineal tears but reduced OASI risk, supporting its safety regarding severe perineal trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信