一项比较30%扁桃酸脱皮与30%乳酸脱皮治疗眼眶周围黑色素病临床疗效的前瞻性研究。

IF 2 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Abhishek Malviya, Shivank Shrivastava, Sanjay Pancholi, Trashita Hassanandani, Varun Kumar, Jayendra Singh Dhakad
{"title":"一项比较30%扁桃酸脱皮与30%乳酸脱皮治疗眼眶周围黑色素病临床疗效的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Abhishek Malviya, Shivank Shrivastava, Sanjay Pancholi, Trashita Hassanandani, Varun Kumar, Jayendra Singh Dhakad","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_1051_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periorbital melanosis (POM), or dark circles, is characterized by hyperpigmentation around the eyes, mainly affecting females aged between 16 to 25 years. It results from genetic and environmental factors. Chemical peels with mandelic acid and lactic acid are commonly used for treatment, but their comparative effectiveness and safety are underexplored. This study compares the effectiveness and safety of 30% mandelic acid peel versus 30% lactic acid peel for treating POM.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare institute over 18 months (September 2022 to February 2024) with 70 patients. They were randomly assigned to receive either mandelic acid (35 patients) or lactic acid peels (35 patients) across three sessions (weeks 0, 2, and 4), followed by an end of study visit at week 6. Efficacy was measured using the POM grading, visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction score, while safety was assessed via adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatment groups showed significant improvement in POM severity, with a shift from higher to lower grades of pigmentation. However, the lactic acid group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in pigmentation (50% of patients with more than 30% improvement in VAS, P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the lactic acid group (100% satisfied vs. 83.9% in the mandelic acid group, P = 0.011). Side effects included mild erythema and swelling, with exfoliation more common in the lactic acid group and irritation more frequent in the mandelic acid group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study is limited by its small sample size and short duration, which may impact the generalizability and long-term evaluation of the treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both 30% mandelic and lactic acid peels effectively treated POM, with lactic acid showing better outcomes and patient satisfaction. Both treatments were safe, but lactic acid may be better for sensitive skin due to milder side effects. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical Efficacy of 30% Mandelic Acid Peel Versus 30% Lactic Acid Peel in Periorbital Melanosis.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Malviya, Shivank Shrivastava, Sanjay Pancholi, Trashita Hassanandani, Varun Kumar, Jayendra Singh Dhakad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/idoj.idoj_1051_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periorbital melanosis (POM), or dark circles, is characterized by hyperpigmentation around the eyes, mainly affecting females aged between 16 to 25 years. It results from genetic and environmental factors. Chemical peels with mandelic acid and lactic acid are commonly used for treatment, but their comparative effectiveness and safety are underexplored. This study compares the effectiveness and safety of 30% mandelic acid peel versus 30% lactic acid peel for treating POM.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare institute over 18 months (September 2022 to February 2024) with 70 patients. They were randomly assigned to receive either mandelic acid (35 patients) or lactic acid peels (35 patients) across three sessions (weeks 0, 2, and 4), followed by an end of study visit at week 6. Efficacy was measured using the POM grading, visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction score, while safety was assessed via adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatment groups showed significant improvement in POM severity, with a shift from higher to lower grades of pigmentation. However, the lactic acid group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in pigmentation (50% of patients with more than 30% improvement in VAS, P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the lactic acid group (100% satisfied vs. 83.9% in the mandelic acid group, P = 0.011). Side effects included mild erythema and swelling, with exfoliation more common in the lactic acid group and irritation more frequent in the mandelic acid group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study is limited by its small sample size and short duration, which may impact the generalizability and long-term evaluation of the treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both 30% mandelic and lactic acid peels effectively treated POM, with lactic acid showing better outcomes and patient satisfaction. Both treatments were safe, but lactic acid may be better for sensitive skin due to milder side effects. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_1051_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_1051_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼周黑色素沉着症(POM)或黑眼圈,以眼部周围色素沉着为特征,主要影响16至25岁的女性。它是遗传和环境因素共同作用的结果。含有扁桃酸和乳酸的化学去皮通常用于治疗,但其相对有效性和安全性尚未得到充分研究。本研究比较了30%扁桃酸果皮和30%乳酸果皮治疗POM的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:在一家三级医疗机构进行了一项为期18个月(2022年9月至2024年2月)的前瞻性比较研究,共有70名患者。他们被随机分配在三个疗程(0,2和4周)中接受扁桃酸(35名患者)或乳酸脱皮(35名患者),随后在第6周结束研究访问。使用POM评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和患者满意度评分来衡量疗效,而通过不良事件来评估安全性。结果:两个治疗组的POM严重程度均有显著改善,色素沉着程度由高到低。然而,乳酸组表现出明显更大的色素沉着减少(50%的患者VAS改善超过30%,P = 0.001)。乳酸组满意率为100%,扁桃酸组满意率为83.9%,P = 0.011。副作用包括轻度红斑和肿胀,乳酸组更常见脱落,扁桃酸组更频繁刺激。局限性:本研究样本量小,持续时间短,可能影响治疗的可推广性和长期评价。结论:30%扁桃酸去皮和乳酸去皮均能有效治疗POM,乳酸去皮效果更好,患者满意度更高。两种治疗方法都是安全的,但乳酸可能对敏感皮肤更好,因为副作用更温和。需要更大规模、更长的随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Study Comparing Clinical Efficacy of 30% Mandelic Acid Peel Versus 30% Lactic Acid Peel in Periorbital Melanosis.

Background: Periorbital melanosis (POM), or dark circles, is characterized by hyperpigmentation around the eyes, mainly affecting females aged between 16 to 25 years. It results from genetic and environmental factors. Chemical peels with mandelic acid and lactic acid are commonly used for treatment, but their comparative effectiveness and safety are underexplored. This study compares the effectiveness and safety of 30% mandelic acid peel versus 30% lactic acid peel for treating POM.

Patients and methods: A prospective, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare institute over 18 months (September 2022 to February 2024) with 70 patients. They were randomly assigned to receive either mandelic acid (35 patients) or lactic acid peels (35 patients) across three sessions (weeks 0, 2, and 4), followed by an end of study visit at week 6. Efficacy was measured using the POM grading, visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction score, while safety was assessed via adverse events.

Results: Both treatment groups showed significant improvement in POM severity, with a shift from higher to lower grades of pigmentation. However, the lactic acid group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in pigmentation (50% of patients with more than 30% improvement in VAS, P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the lactic acid group (100% satisfied vs. 83.9% in the mandelic acid group, P = 0.011). Side effects included mild erythema and swelling, with exfoliation more common in the lactic acid group and irritation more frequent in the mandelic acid group.

Limitations: This study is limited by its small sample size and short duration, which may impact the generalizability and long-term evaluation of the treatments.

Conclusion: Both 30% mandelic and lactic acid peels effectively treated POM, with lactic acid showing better outcomes and patient satisfaction. Both treatments were safe, but lactic acid may be better for sensitive skin due to milder side effects. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信