维持性血液透析患者获益发现的异质性:基于决策树的自我效能和社会支持亚组分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458
Yan Fan, Tianci Tong, Yiru Wang, Yanlin Gong, Jing Wu, Jing Chu
{"title":"维持性血液透析患者获益发现的异质性:基于决策树的自我效能和社会支持亚组分析。","authors":"Yan Fan, Tianci Tong, Yiru Wang, Yanlin Gong, Jing Wu, Jing Chu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benefit finding (BF) improves quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, yet population heterogeneity remains understudied. This study explores how self-efficacy and social support jointly influence BF patterns and identifies distinct patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 at five tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, enrolling 352 MHD patients. Data from the Benefit Finding Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale were used to construct a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model employing five-fold cross-validation, with a maximum depth of 3 and a minimum leaf node size of 10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CART model (R²=0.278) identified five distinct BF subgroups (<i>p</i><0.001): Low Self-Efficacy Constrained Group, Psychological Resource Deficient Group, Internally Belief Driven Group, Balanced Resource Adaptation Group, and Resource Integrated Advantage Group, each characterized by unique combinations of self-efficacy and social support. Significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of gender(<i>p</i>=0.045), education level(<i>p</i>=0.010), and employment status(<i>p</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BF levels in MHD patients demonstrated significant variations influenced by the combined effects of self-efficacy and social support. The decision tree model successfully identified patient subgroups with distinct psychological resource configurations. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for implementing stratified and personalized psychological interventions in clinical practice. Clinicians can identify and prioritize vulnerable patients who simultaneously lack self-efficacy and social support, offering them targeted positive psychological interventions that may potentially improve treatment adherence and long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1665458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Fan, Tianci Tong, Yiru Wang, Yanlin Gong, Jing Wu, Jing Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benefit finding (BF) improves quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, yet population heterogeneity remains understudied. This study explores how self-efficacy and social support jointly influence BF patterns and identifies distinct patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 at five tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, enrolling 352 MHD patients. Data from the Benefit Finding Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale were used to construct a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model employing five-fold cross-validation, with a maximum depth of 3 and a minimum leaf node size of 10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CART model (R²=0.278) identified five distinct BF subgroups (<i>p</i><0.001): Low Self-Efficacy Constrained Group, Psychological Resource Deficient Group, Internally Belief Driven Group, Balanced Resource Adaptation Group, and Resource Integrated Advantage Group, each characterized by unique combinations of self-efficacy and social support. Significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of gender(<i>p</i>=0.045), education level(<i>p</i>=0.010), and employment status(<i>p</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BF levels in MHD patients demonstrated significant variations influenced by the combined effects of self-efficacy and social support. The decision tree model successfully identified patient subgroups with distinct psychological resource configurations. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for implementing stratified and personalized psychological interventions in clinical practice. Clinicians can identify and prioritize vulnerable patients who simultaneously lack self-efficacy and social support, offering them targeted positive psychological interventions that may potentially improve treatment adherence and long-term prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1665458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:获益发现(BF)改善了维持性血液透析(MHD)患者的生活质量,但人群异质性仍有待研究。本研究探讨自我效能和社会支持如何共同影响BF模式,并确定不同的患者亚群。方法:本多中心横断面研究于2023年4 - 9月在中国上海5家三级医院进行,共纳入352例MHD患者。利用利益发现量表、一般自我效能量表和感知社会支持量表的数据构建分类回归树(CART)模型,采用五重交叉验证,最大深度为3,最小叶节点大小为10%。结果:CART模型(R²=0.278)识别出5个不同的BF亚组(pp=0.045)、教育水平(p=0.010)和就业状况(p=0.003)。结论:MHD患者的BF水平在自我效能感和社会支持的共同作用下存在显著差异。决策树模型成功地识别出具有不同心理资源配置的患者亚组。这些发现为在临床实践中实施分层和个性化的心理干预提供了理论基础。临床医生可以识别并优先考虑同时缺乏自我效能感和社会支持的弱势患者,为他们提供有针对性的积极心理干预,这可能会提高治疗依从性和长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.

Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.

Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.

Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.

Background: Benefit finding (BF) improves quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, yet population heterogeneity remains understudied. This study explores how self-efficacy and social support jointly influence BF patterns and identifies distinct patient subgroups.

Methods: This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 at five tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, enrolling 352 MHD patients. Data from the Benefit Finding Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale were used to construct a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model employing five-fold cross-validation, with a maximum depth of 3 and a minimum leaf node size of 10%.

Results: The CART model (R²=0.278) identified five distinct BF subgroups (p<0.001): Low Self-Efficacy Constrained Group, Psychological Resource Deficient Group, Internally Belief Driven Group, Balanced Resource Adaptation Group, and Resource Integrated Advantage Group, each characterized by unique combinations of self-efficacy and social support. Significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of gender(p=0.045), education level(p=0.010), and employment status(p=0.003).

Conclusion: BF levels in MHD patients demonstrated significant variations influenced by the combined effects of self-efficacy and social support. The decision tree model successfully identified patient subgroups with distinct psychological resource configurations. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for implementing stratified and personalized psychological interventions in clinical practice. Clinicians can identify and prioritize vulnerable patients who simultaneously lack self-efficacy and social support, offering them targeted positive psychological interventions that may potentially improve treatment adherence and long-term prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信