{"title":"维持性血液透析患者获益发现的异质性:基于决策树的自我效能和社会支持亚组分析。","authors":"Yan Fan, Tianci Tong, Yiru Wang, Yanlin Gong, Jing Wu, Jing Chu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benefit finding (BF) improves quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, yet population heterogeneity remains understudied. This study explores how self-efficacy and social support jointly influence BF patterns and identifies distinct patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 at five tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, enrolling 352 MHD patients. Data from the Benefit Finding Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale were used to construct a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model employing five-fold cross-validation, with a maximum depth of 3 and a minimum leaf node size of 10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CART model (R²=0.278) identified five distinct BF subgroups (<i>p</i><0.001): Low Self-Efficacy Constrained Group, Psychological Resource Deficient Group, Internally Belief Driven Group, Balanced Resource Adaptation Group, and Resource Integrated Advantage Group, each characterized by unique combinations of self-efficacy and social support. Significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of gender(<i>p</i>=0.045), education level(<i>p</i>=0.010), and employment status(<i>p</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BF levels in MHD patients demonstrated significant variations influenced by the combined effects of self-efficacy and social support. The decision tree model successfully identified patient subgroups with distinct psychological resource configurations. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for implementing stratified and personalized psychological interventions in clinical practice. Clinicians can identify and prioritize vulnerable patients who simultaneously lack self-efficacy and social support, offering them targeted positive psychological interventions that may potentially improve treatment adherence and long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1665458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Fan, Tianci Tong, Yiru Wang, Yanlin Gong, Jing Wu, Jing Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benefit finding (BF) improves quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, yet population heterogeneity remains understudied. This study explores how self-efficacy and social support jointly influence BF patterns and identifies distinct patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 at five tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, enrolling 352 MHD patients. Data from the Benefit Finding Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale were used to construct a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model employing five-fold cross-validation, with a maximum depth of 3 and a minimum leaf node size of 10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CART model (R²=0.278) identified five distinct BF subgroups (<i>p</i><0.001): Low Self-Efficacy Constrained Group, Psychological Resource Deficient Group, Internally Belief Driven Group, Balanced Resource Adaptation Group, and Resource Integrated Advantage Group, each characterized by unique combinations of self-efficacy and social support. Significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of gender(<i>p</i>=0.045), education level(<i>p</i>=0.010), and employment status(<i>p</i>=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BF levels in MHD patients demonstrated significant variations influenced by the combined effects of self-efficacy and social support. The decision tree model successfully identified patient subgroups with distinct psychological resource configurations. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for implementing stratified and personalized psychological interventions in clinical practice. Clinicians can identify and prioritize vulnerable patients who simultaneously lack self-efficacy and social support, offering them targeted positive psychological interventions that may potentially improve treatment adherence and long-term prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1665458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1665458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Heterogeneity of benefit finding in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a decision tree-based subgroup analysis of self-efficacy and social support.
Background: Benefit finding (BF) improves quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, yet population heterogeneity remains understudied. This study explores how self-efficacy and social support jointly influence BF patterns and identifies distinct patient subgroups.
Methods: This multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from April to September 2023 at five tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, enrolling 352 MHD patients. Data from the Benefit Finding Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale were used to construct a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model employing five-fold cross-validation, with a maximum depth of 3 and a minimum leaf node size of 10%.
Results: The CART model (R²=0.278) identified five distinct BF subgroups (p<0.001): Low Self-Efficacy Constrained Group, Psychological Resource Deficient Group, Internally Belief Driven Group, Balanced Resource Adaptation Group, and Resource Integrated Advantage Group, each characterized by unique combinations of self-efficacy and social support. Significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of gender(p=0.045), education level(p=0.010), and employment status(p=0.003).
Conclusion: BF levels in MHD patients demonstrated significant variations influenced by the combined effects of self-efficacy and social support. The decision tree model successfully identified patient subgroups with distinct psychological resource configurations. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for implementing stratified and personalized psychological interventions in clinical practice. Clinicians can identify and prioritize vulnerable patients who simultaneously lack self-efficacy and social support, offering them targeted positive psychological interventions that may potentially improve treatment adherence and long-term prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.