媒体对协助自杀的描述在合法化变化之前,期间和之后:奥地利报纸报道的内容分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617602
Paul Pürcher, Benedikt Till, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler
{"title":"媒体对协助自杀的描述在合法化变化之前,期间和之后:奥地利报纸报道的内容分析。","authors":"Paul Pürcher, Benedikt Till, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assisted suicide (AS) was legalized in Austria in 2022 for adults in specific circumstances, adding Austria to a list of several countries where AS has recently been legalized. The topic has been discussed controversially in the Austrian public, which has been reflected in the media reporting. Information about the content of media reports on AS is currently lacking although it is important from a suicide prevention perspective. The aim of this study was to analyze newspaper media items on AS from Austrian daily newspapers based on media guidelines for the reporting on suicide and to adapt them in the process to the specific topic of AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Media items from 11 Austrian daily newspapers from the time period 2017 to 2022 were retrieved based on 12 predefined keywords. A total of <i>n</i> = 906 articles were analyzed with regard to 12 characteristics advised against in media guidelines and 7 recommended characteristics. We compared the quality of media items between three time periods: period 1 (before the initiation of legislation change regarding AS in Austria, 01/2017-12/2019), period 2 (around the decision of legalization of AS, 01/2020-12/2021), and period 3 (after the implementation of AS in Austria, 01/2022-12/2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several characteristics advised against in suicide reporting guidelines (e.g., romanticization/glorification of AS) were relatively frequent across all three time periods, while recommended characteristics (e.g., references to mental health services) were less common. Comparison across time showed that stigmatization and romanticization/glorification, though prevalent, declined after AS was implemented, whereas reporting on epidemics and waves of AS peaked immediately before its implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This content analysis revealed distinct patterns in media reporting on AS and showed that reports were less aligned with media guidelines than previous analyses on non-assisted suicide. Some patterns identified across all time periods, particularly tendencies to stigmatize or romanticize AS before the legislation, likely reflect polarized public attitudes, which warrant attention in education efforts. This research highlights the importance of specific aspects of media guidelines during public debate on AS and the need to tailor them to this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1617602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media portrayals of assisted suicide before, during, and after legalization changes: content analysis of the reporting in Austrian newspapers.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Pürcher, Benedikt Till, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assisted suicide (AS) was legalized in Austria in 2022 for adults in specific circumstances, adding Austria to a list of several countries where AS has recently been legalized. The topic has been discussed controversially in the Austrian public, which has been reflected in the media reporting. Information about the content of media reports on AS is currently lacking although it is important from a suicide prevention perspective. The aim of this study was to analyze newspaper media items on AS from Austrian daily newspapers based on media guidelines for the reporting on suicide and to adapt them in the process to the specific topic of AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Media items from 11 Austrian daily newspapers from the time period 2017 to 2022 were retrieved based on 12 predefined keywords. A total of <i>n</i> = 906 articles were analyzed with regard to 12 characteristics advised against in media guidelines and 7 recommended characteristics. We compared the quality of media items between three time periods: period 1 (before the initiation of legislation change regarding AS in Austria, 01/2017-12/2019), period 2 (around the decision of legalization of AS, 01/2020-12/2021), and period 3 (after the implementation of AS in Austria, 01/2022-12/2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several characteristics advised against in suicide reporting guidelines (e.g., romanticization/glorification of AS) were relatively frequent across all three time periods, while recommended characteristics (e.g., references to mental health services) were less common. Comparison across time showed that stigmatization and romanticization/glorification, though prevalent, declined after AS was implemented, whereas reporting on epidemics and waves of AS peaked immediately before its implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This content analysis revealed distinct patterns in media reporting on AS and showed that reports were less aligned with media guidelines than previous analyses on non-assisted suicide. Some patterns identified across all time periods, particularly tendencies to stigmatize or romanticize AS before the legislation, likely reflect polarized public attitudes, which warrant attention in education efforts. This research highlights the importance of specific aspects of media guidelines during public debate on AS and the need to tailor them to this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1617602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在特定情况下,协助自杀(AS)在奥地利于2022年合法化,使奥地利成为最近将AS合法化的几个国家之一。这个话题在奥地利公众中引起了争议,这也反映在媒体的报道中。虽然从预防自杀的角度来看,媒体对AS的报道内容很重要,但目前还缺乏相关信息。本研究的目的是根据自杀报道的媒体指南,分析奥地利日报上关于AS的报纸媒体项目,并在此过程中使其适应AS的具体主题。方法:基于12个预定义关键词检索2017 - 2022年奥地利11家日报的媒体项目。总共n = 906篇文章被分析了12个媒体指南中反对的特征和7个推荐的特征。我们比较了三个时间段的媒体项目质量:第一阶段(在奥地利关于AS的立法变化开始之前,2017年1月- 2019年12月),第二阶段(在AS合法化决定前后,2020年1月- 2021年12月),第三阶段(在奥地利实施AS之后,2022年1月- 2022年12月)。结果:自杀报告指南中反对的几个特征(例如,浪漫化/美化AS)在所有三个时期都相对频繁,而推荐的特征(例如,提及心理健康服务)则不太常见。不同时期的比较表明,尽管污名化和浪漫化/美化普遍存在,但在AS实施后有所下降,而关于流行病和AS浪潮的报道在实施前达到顶峰。讨论:这一内容分析揭示了媒体对阿斯伯格综合症报道的不同模式,并表明与之前对非辅助自杀的分析相比,报道与媒体指南的一致性更低。在所有时期发现的一些模式,特别是在立法之前将AS污名化或浪漫化的倾向,可能反映了两极分化的公众态度,这需要在教育工作中引起注意。这项研究强调了在关于阿斯伯格症的公开辩论中,媒体指导方针的特定方面的重要性,以及对它们进行调整以适应这一主题的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Media portrayals of assisted suicide before, during, and after legalization changes: content analysis of the reporting in Austrian newspapers.

Media portrayals of assisted suicide before, during, and after legalization changes: content analysis of the reporting in Austrian newspapers.

Introduction: Assisted suicide (AS) was legalized in Austria in 2022 for adults in specific circumstances, adding Austria to a list of several countries where AS has recently been legalized. The topic has been discussed controversially in the Austrian public, which has been reflected in the media reporting. Information about the content of media reports on AS is currently lacking although it is important from a suicide prevention perspective. The aim of this study was to analyze newspaper media items on AS from Austrian daily newspapers based on media guidelines for the reporting on suicide and to adapt them in the process to the specific topic of AS.

Methods: Media items from 11 Austrian daily newspapers from the time period 2017 to 2022 were retrieved based on 12 predefined keywords. A total of n = 906 articles were analyzed with regard to 12 characteristics advised against in media guidelines and 7 recommended characteristics. We compared the quality of media items between three time periods: period 1 (before the initiation of legislation change regarding AS in Austria, 01/2017-12/2019), period 2 (around the decision of legalization of AS, 01/2020-12/2021), and period 3 (after the implementation of AS in Austria, 01/2022-12/2022).

Results: Several characteristics advised against in suicide reporting guidelines (e.g., romanticization/glorification of AS) were relatively frequent across all three time periods, while recommended characteristics (e.g., references to mental health services) were less common. Comparison across time showed that stigmatization and romanticization/glorification, though prevalent, declined after AS was implemented, whereas reporting on epidemics and waves of AS peaked immediately before its implementation.

Discussion: This content analysis revealed distinct patterns in media reporting on AS and showed that reports were less aligned with media guidelines than previous analyses on non-assisted suicide. Some patterns identified across all time periods, particularly tendencies to stigmatize or romanticize AS before the legislation, likely reflect polarized public attitudes, which warrant attention in education efforts. This research highlights the importance of specific aspects of media guidelines during public debate on AS and the need to tailor them to this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信