谵妄与创伤后应激障碍的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1654136
Xia Yang, Fang Chen, Zhixia Jiang, Nan Xu, Xia Zhang, Qingqing Chen, Mingwei Cao
{"title":"谵妄与创伤后应激障碍的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xia Yang, Fang Chen, Zhixia Jiang, Nan Xu, Xia Zhang, Qingqing Chen, Mingwei Cao","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1654136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium, a prevalent form of acute brain dysfunction, is characterized by perceptual disturbances that may lead to the formation of delusional memories. This pathological process could subsequently elevate the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the findings of previous research are inconsistent, and the association has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, this study attempts to clarify the epidemiological relationship between delirium and PTSD as well as its clinical significance through a thorough integration of the available data, aiming to provide an evidence-based foundation for the early identification of high-risk patients and the creation of focused intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines during the literature search. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, covering all relevant literature published from each database's inception until April 3, 2025. The search strategy combined free-text terms with controlled vocabulary (MeSH/Emtree terms) related to delirium and PTSD. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251031880).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 articles were included in this study. Meta-analysis of unadjusted ORs revealed that patients with delirium exhibited a significantly higher risk of developing PTSD compared to non-delirium controls (OR = 3.31, 95% CI [2.21-4.97]). After adjusting for potential confounders, the pooled results based on adjusted ORs continued to indicate a significant association between delirium and increased PTSD risk (OR = 3.96, 95% CI [1.85-8.50]). Six studies explored differences in PTSD scores between delirious and non-delirious patients. Of the four studies initially reporting median values, two were excluded following skewness assessment for non-normal data distribution. The data from the remaining two studies were transformed into mean ± <i>SD</i> format for subsequent analysis. A meta-analysis of these four trials revealed that patients with delirium scored significantly higher on PTSD symptoms than those without (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-0.78, Z = 3.459, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis found a significant association between PTSD and delirium.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251031880, identifier CRD420251031880.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1654136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of delirium with post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xia Yang, Fang Chen, Zhixia Jiang, Nan Xu, Xia Zhang, Qingqing Chen, Mingwei Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1654136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium, a prevalent form of acute brain dysfunction, is characterized by perceptual disturbances that may lead to the formation of delusional memories. This pathological process could subsequently elevate the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the findings of previous research are inconsistent, and the association has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, this study attempts to clarify the epidemiological relationship between delirium and PTSD as well as its clinical significance through a thorough integration of the available data, aiming to provide an evidence-based foundation for the early identification of high-risk patients and the creation of focused intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines during the literature search. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, covering all relevant literature published from each database's inception until April 3, 2025. The search strategy combined free-text terms with controlled vocabulary (MeSH/Emtree terms) related to delirium and PTSD. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251031880).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 articles were included in this study. Meta-analysis of unadjusted ORs revealed that patients with delirium exhibited a significantly higher risk of developing PTSD compared to non-delirium controls (OR = 3.31, 95% CI [2.21-4.97]). After adjusting for potential confounders, the pooled results based on adjusted ORs continued to indicate a significant association between delirium and increased PTSD risk (OR = 3.96, 95% CI [1.85-8.50]). Six studies explored differences in PTSD scores between delirious and non-delirious patients. Of the four studies initially reporting median values, two were excluded following skewness assessment for non-normal data distribution. The data from the remaining two studies were transformed into mean ± <i>SD</i> format for subsequent analysis. A meta-analysis of these four trials revealed that patients with delirium scored significantly higher on PTSD symptoms than those without (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-0.78, Z = 3.459, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis found a significant association between PTSD and delirium.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251031880, identifier CRD420251031880.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1654136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488650/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1654136\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1654136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:谵妄是一种常见的急性脑功能障碍,其特征是知觉障碍,可能导致妄想性记忆的形成。这一病理过程可能随后增加发展为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险。然而,以往的研究结果是不一致的,并且没有系统地评估这种关联。因此,本研究试图通过对现有资料的全面整合,阐明谵妄与PTSD的流行病学关系及其临床意义,旨在为早期识别高危患者和制定有针对性的干预策略提供循证基础。方法:在文献检索中,我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。在PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus和CINAHL中进行了综合检索,涵盖了从每个数据库建立到2025年4月3日发表的所有相关文献。搜索策略将自由文本术语与与谵妄和创伤后应激障碍相关的受控词汇(MeSH/Emtree术语)相结合。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251031880)。结果:本研究共纳入11篇文献。未经调整的OR荟萃分析显示,谵妄患者发生PTSD的风险明显高于非谵妄对照组(OR = 3.31, 95% CI[2.21-4.97])。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,基于调整后的OR的合并结果继续表明谵妄与PTSD风险增加之间存在显著关联(OR = 3.96, 95% CI[1.85-8.50])。六项研究探讨了精神错乱和非精神错乱患者PTSD评分的差异。在最初报告中位数的四项研究中,有两项因非正态数据分布的偏度评估而被排除。其余两项研究的数据转化为mean±SD格式,以便后续分析。对这四项试验的荟萃分析显示,谵妄患者的PTSD症状得分明显高于无谵妄患者(SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-0.78, Z = 3.459, p)。结论:本荟萃分析发现PTSD与谵妄之间存在显著相关性。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251031880,标识符CRD420251031880。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of delirium with post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Association of delirium with post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Association of delirium with post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Association of delirium with post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Delirium, a prevalent form of acute brain dysfunction, is characterized by perceptual disturbances that may lead to the formation of delusional memories. This pathological process could subsequently elevate the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the findings of previous research are inconsistent, and the association has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, this study attempts to clarify the epidemiological relationship between delirium and PTSD as well as its clinical significance through a thorough integration of the available data, aiming to provide an evidence-based foundation for the early identification of high-risk patients and the creation of focused intervention strategies.

Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines during the literature search. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, covering all relevant literature published from each database's inception until April 3, 2025. The search strategy combined free-text terms with controlled vocabulary (MeSH/Emtree terms) related to delirium and PTSD. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251031880).

Results: A total of 11 articles were included in this study. Meta-analysis of unadjusted ORs revealed that patients with delirium exhibited a significantly higher risk of developing PTSD compared to non-delirium controls (OR = 3.31, 95% CI [2.21-4.97]). After adjusting for potential confounders, the pooled results based on adjusted ORs continued to indicate a significant association between delirium and increased PTSD risk (OR = 3.96, 95% CI [1.85-8.50]). Six studies explored differences in PTSD scores between delirious and non-delirious patients. Of the four studies initially reporting median values, two were excluded following skewness assessment for non-normal data distribution. The data from the remaining two studies were transformed into mean ± SD format for subsequent analysis. A meta-analysis of these four trials revealed that patients with delirium scored significantly higher on PTSD symptoms than those without (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-0.78, Z = 3.459, P<0.001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found a significant association between PTSD and delirium.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251031880, identifier CRD420251031880.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信