Xian-Quan Zhang, Zhen-Hui Hua, Chu-Jia Huang, Hai-Yun Chen, Zong-Ren Hu, Mei-Ren Zhang, Jun Liu
{"title":"淫羊藿治疗原发性骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xian-Quan Zhang, Zhen-Hui Hua, Chu-Jia Huang, Hai-Yun Chen, Zong-Ren Hu, Mei-Ren Zhang, Jun Liu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary Osteoporosis (POP) is a global public health issue, and traditional medications have long-term safety concerns. Epimedium, a kidney-tonifying traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has the potential to regulate bone metabolism through multiple targets, but clinical evidence is scattered and inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epimedium and its active components in treating POP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Computer searches were conducted in multiple domestic and international databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of Epimedium as an adjunct or alternative therapy with traditional drug treatments for POP. Literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessments were performed on eligible articles, relevant data were extracted, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 RCTs were included, with a final inclusion of 890 cases, 448 in the experimental group and 442 in the control group. Meta-analysis suggests that the overall efficacy rate of the Epimedium group was significantly higher than that of the control group (OR = 3.80; 95% CI: 2.27,6.37; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Compared with the control group, Epimedium group's Lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.61,1.70; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), Femoral neck BMD (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58,1.65; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), Distal radius BMD (SMD = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.57,1.98; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), and Metacarpal BMD (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04,0.12; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) all showed significant improvement, with a shorter time to relief of lower back pain (MD = -11.38; 95% CI: -12.63, -10.12; <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly reduced (MD = -8.78; 95% CI: -12.80, -4.77; <0.0001), while bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) increased (MD = 6.73; 95% CI: 3.32,10.14; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Adverse reactions were low, mainly mild gastrointestinal reactions or skin allergies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epimedium can effectively improve bone density and clinical symptoms in patients with POP, with good safety, making it a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment option, but more high-quality studies are needed to verify long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1675160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of Epimedium in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xian-Quan Zhang, Zhen-Hui Hua, Chu-Jia Huang, Hai-Yun Chen, Zong-Ren Hu, Mei-Ren Zhang, Jun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary Osteoporosis (POP) is a global public health issue, and traditional medications have long-term safety concerns. Epimedium, a kidney-tonifying traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has the potential to regulate bone metabolism through multiple targets, but clinical evidence is scattered and inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epimedium and its active components in treating POP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Computer searches were conducted in multiple domestic and international databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of Epimedium as an adjunct or alternative therapy with traditional drug treatments for POP. Literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessments were performed on eligible articles, relevant data were extracted, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 RCTs were included, with a final inclusion of 890 cases, 448 in the experimental group and 442 in the control group. Meta-analysis suggests that the overall efficacy rate of the Epimedium group was significantly higher than that of the control group (OR = 3.80; 95% CI: 2.27,6.37; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Compared with the control group, Epimedium group's Lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.61,1.70; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), Femoral neck BMD (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58,1.65; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), Distal radius BMD (SMD = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.57,1.98; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), and Metacarpal BMD (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04,0.12; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) all showed significant improvement, with a shorter time to relief of lower back pain (MD = -11.38; 95% CI: -12.63, -10.12; <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly reduced (MD = -8.78; 95% CI: -12.80, -4.77; <0.0001), while bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) increased (MD = 6.73; 95% CI: 3.32,10.14; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Adverse reactions were low, mainly mild gastrointestinal reactions or skin allergies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epimedium can effectively improve bone density and clinical symptoms in patients with POP, with good safety, making it a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment option, but more high-quality studies are needed to verify long-term efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1675160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491210/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1675160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The efficacy and safety of Epimedium in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Primary Osteoporosis (POP) is a global public health issue, and traditional medications have long-term safety concerns. Epimedium, a kidney-tonifying traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has the potential to regulate bone metabolism through multiple targets, but clinical evidence is scattered and inconclusive.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epimedium and its active components in treating POP.
Method: Computer searches were conducted in multiple domestic and international databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of Epimedium as an adjunct or alternative therapy with traditional drug treatments for POP. Literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessments were performed on eligible articles, relevant data were extracted, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.
Results: A total of 10 RCTs were included, with a final inclusion of 890 cases, 448 in the experimental group and 442 in the control group. Meta-analysis suggests that the overall efficacy rate of the Epimedium group was significantly higher than that of the control group (OR = 3.80; 95% CI: 2.27,6.37; p = 0.0001). Compared with the control group, Epimedium group's Lumbar vertebra bone mineral density (BMD) (SMD = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.61,1.70; p < 0.0001), Femoral neck BMD (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.58,1.65; p < 0.0001), Distal radius BMD (SMD = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.57,1.98; p = 0.0004), and Metacarpal BMD (MD = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.04,0.12; p < 0.0001) all showed significant improvement, with a shorter time to relief of lower back pain (MD = -11.38; 95% CI: -12.63, -10.12; p < 0.00001). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly reduced (MD = -8.78; 95% CI: -12.80, -4.77; <0.0001), while bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) increased (MD = 6.73; 95% CI: 3.32,10.14; p = 0.0001). Adverse reactions were low, mainly mild gastrointestinal reactions or skin allergies.
Conclusion: Epimedium can effectively improve bone density and clinical symptoms in patients with POP, with good safety, making it a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment option, but more high-quality studies are needed to verify long-term efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world