呼吸肌肉训练对慢性脑卒中患者呼吸功能、运动能力和生活质量的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1642262
Lang Huang, Jia-Mei Zhang, Zi-Ting Bi, Jing-Hua Xiao, Jing-Xue Wei, Jian Huang, Chao-Song Luo, Ying-Dong Li, Yue-Mi Zhang, Yun-Shan Zhang
{"title":"呼吸肌肉训练对慢性脑卒中患者呼吸功能、运动能力和生活质量的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Lang Huang, Jia-Mei Zhang, Zi-Ting Bi, Jing-Hua Xiao, Jing-Xue Wei, Jian Huang, Chao-Song Luo, Ying-Dong Li, Yue-Mi Zhang, Yun-Shan Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1642262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory muscle training is a structured intervention targeting the respiratory muscles, yet its effect on chronic stroke patients remains unclear. The study evaluated the influence of this training on respiratory function, exercise capacity and quality of life among individuals who experienced chronic strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adhered to the PRISMA statement guidelines. A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted without date limitations, extending until 8 March 2025. The search targeted randomised controlled trials that involved: 1) chronic stroke patients (≥18 years, diagnosed for >3 months), 2) respiratory muscle training encompasses both inspiratory and expiratory muscle training, and 3) outcomes measuring the strength and endurance of respiratory muscle, pulmonary function testing, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Two separate reviewers conducted the screening for eligibility, gathered data, and evaluated both the methodological quality and potential risk of bias. Meta-analyses utilized RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, United Kingdom), applying random-effects models to calculate mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included, comprising 288 participants (143 males and 145 females) with a mean age of 58.5 years. For primary outcomes, respiratory muscle training significantly enhanced maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 17.71 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 10.19-25.23) and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 20.58 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 12.25-28.92) among chronic stroke patients, but no significant effects were observed for maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 11.37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: -0.78-25.23). The subgroup analysis revealed that the combination of inspiratory muscle training and expiratory muscle training enhanced maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 23.47 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 3.65-43.30) and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 34.00 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 21.21-46.79), while inspiratory muscle training improved maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 14.09 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 7.57-20.62), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 8.69 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 0.63-16.75), and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 16.69 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 10.27-23.11). For secondary outcomes, significant improvements occurred in forced expiratory volume in 1s (MD = 0.25 L, 95% CI: 0.06-0.44) and peak expiratory flow (MD = 0.84 L/s, 95% CI: 0.31-1.37), but not in forced vital capacity (MD = 0.16 L, 95% CI: -0.08-0.41), exercise capacity (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: -0.03-0.61), and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respiratory muscle training effectively enhances primary outcomes, including maximal inspiratory pressure and respiratory muscle endurance, as well as secondary outcomes such as forced expiratory volume in 1s and peak expiratory flow in chronic stroke patients, but does not improve maximal expiratory pressure, forced vital capacity, exercise capacity, and quality of life. The combination of inspiratory muscle training with expiratory muscle training, as well as inspiratory muscle training alone, can enhance maximal inspiratory pressure and the endurance of respiratory muscles. Furthermore, inspiratory muscle training alone can improve maximal expiratory pressure.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>identifier, CRD42024517859.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1642262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lang Huang, Jia-Mei Zhang, Zi-Ting Bi, Jing-Hua Xiao, Jing-Xue Wei, Jian Huang, Chao-Song Luo, Ying-Dong Li, Yue-Mi Zhang, Yun-Shan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2025.1642262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory muscle training is a structured intervention targeting the respiratory muscles, yet its effect on chronic stroke patients remains unclear. The study evaluated the influence of this training on respiratory function, exercise capacity and quality of life among individuals who experienced chronic strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adhered to the PRISMA statement guidelines. A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted without date limitations, extending until 8 March 2025. The search targeted randomised controlled trials that involved: 1) chronic stroke patients (≥18 years, diagnosed for >3 months), 2) respiratory muscle training encompasses both inspiratory and expiratory muscle training, and 3) outcomes measuring the strength and endurance of respiratory muscle, pulmonary function testing, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Two separate reviewers conducted the screening for eligibility, gathered data, and evaluated both the methodological quality and potential risk of bias. Meta-analyses utilized RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, United Kingdom), applying random-effects models to calculate mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included, comprising 288 participants (143 males and 145 females) with a mean age of 58.5 years. For primary outcomes, respiratory muscle training significantly enhanced maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 17.71 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 10.19-25.23) and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 20.58 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 12.25-28.92) among chronic stroke patients, but no significant effects were observed for maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 11.37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: -0.78-25.23). The subgroup analysis revealed that the combination of inspiratory muscle training and expiratory muscle training enhanced maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 23.47 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 3.65-43.30) and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 34.00 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 21.21-46.79), while inspiratory muscle training improved maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 14.09 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 7.57-20.62), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 8.69 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 0.63-16.75), and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 16.69 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 95% CI: 10.27-23.11). For secondary outcomes, significant improvements occurred in forced expiratory volume in 1s (MD = 0.25 L, 95% CI: 0.06-0.44) and peak expiratory flow (MD = 0.84 L/s, 95% CI: 0.31-1.37), but not in forced vital capacity (MD = 0.16 L, 95% CI: -0.08-0.41), exercise capacity (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: -0.03-0.61), and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respiratory muscle training effectively enhances primary outcomes, including maximal inspiratory pressure and respiratory muscle endurance, as well as secondary outcomes such as forced expiratory volume in 1s and peak expiratory flow in chronic stroke patients, but does not improve maximal expiratory pressure, forced vital capacity, exercise capacity, and quality of life. The combination of inspiratory muscle training with expiratory muscle training, as well as inspiratory muscle training alone, can enhance maximal inspiratory pressure and the endurance of respiratory muscles. Furthermore, inspiratory muscle training alone can improve maximal expiratory pressure.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>identifier, CRD42024517859.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1642262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1642262\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1642262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸肌训练是一种针对呼吸肌的结构化干预,但其对慢性脑卒中患者的影响尚不清楚。该研究评估了这种训练对慢性中风患者呼吸功能、运动能力和生活质量的影响。方法:本研究遵循PRISMA声明指南。对PubMed、Embase、AMED、CINAHL、Cochrane Library和Web of Science等数据库进行了全面的检索,没有日期限制,截止日期为2025年3月8日。搜索的目标是随机对照试验,涉及:1)慢性卒中患者(≥18岁,诊断为bbbb3个月),2)呼吸肌训练包括吸气和呼气肌训练,以及3)测量呼吸肌力量和耐力,肺功能测试,运动能力和生活质量的结果。两位独立的审稿人进行了资格筛选,收集了数据,并评估了方法学质量和潜在的偏倚风险。meta分析采用RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, uk),采用随机效应模型计算平均差(MD)、标准化平均差(SMD)和相应的95%置信区间(95% CI)。结果:纳入9项研究,288名参与者(143名男性,145名女性),平均年龄58.5岁。对于主要结局,呼吸肌肉训练显著提高慢性卒中患者的最大吸气压力(MD = 17.71 cmH2O, 95% CI: 10.19-25.23)和呼吸肌耐力(MD = 20.58 cmH2O, 95% CI: 12.25-28.92),但对最大呼气压力(MD = 11.37 cmH2O, 95% CI: -0.78-25.23)无显著影响。亚组分析显示,吸气肌训练和呼气肌训练相结合可提高最大吸气压力(MD = 23.47 cmH2O, 95% CI: 3.65 ~ 43.30)和呼吸肌耐力(MD = 34.00 cmH2O, 95% CI: 21.21 ~ 46.79),而吸气肌训练可提高最大吸气压力(MD = 14.09 cmH2O, 95% CI: 7.57 ~ 20.62)和最大呼气压力(MD = 8.69 cmH2O, 95% CI: 8.69 cmH2O)。0.63-16.75)和呼吸肌耐力(MD = 16.69 cmH2O, 95% CI: 10.27-23.11)。次要结局方面,15秒内的用力呼气量(MD = 0.25 L, 95% CI: 0.06-0.44)和呼气峰值流量(MD = 0.84 L/s, 95% CI: 0.31-1.37)有显著改善,但用力肺活量(MD = 0.16 L, 95% CI: -0.08-0.41)、运动能力(SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: -0.03-0.61)和生活质量无显著改善。结论:呼吸肌训练可有效提高慢性脑卒中患者最大吸气压力、呼吸肌耐力等主要指标及1s用力呼气量、呼气峰值流量等次要指标,但不能改善最大呼气压力、用力肺活量、运动能力和生活质量。吸气肌训练与呼气肌训练相结合,以及单独进行吸气肌训练,都能增强最大吸气压力和呼吸肌的耐力。此外,单独进行吸气肌训练可以提高最大呼气压。系统评价注册:标识符,CRD42024517859。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Respiratory muscle training is a structured intervention targeting the respiratory muscles, yet its effect on chronic stroke patients remains unclear. The study evaluated the influence of this training on respiratory function, exercise capacity and quality of life among individuals who experienced chronic strokes.

Methods: This study adhered to the PRISMA statement guidelines. A comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted without date limitations, extending until 8 March 2025. The search targeted randomised controlled trials that involved: 1) chronic stroke patients (≥18 years, diagnosed for >3 months), 2) respiratory muscle training encompasses both inspiratory and expiratory muscle training, and 3) outcomes measuring the strength and endurance of respiratory muscle, pulmonary function testing, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Two separate reviewers conducted the screening for eligibility, gathered data, and evaluated both the methodological quality and potential risk of bias. Meta-analyses utilized RevMan version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, United Kingdom), applying random-effects models to calculate mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: Nine studies were included, comprising 288 participants (143 males and 145 females) with a mean age of 58.5 years. For primary outcomes, respiratory muscle training significantly enhanced maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 17.71 cmH2O, 95% CI: 10.19-25.23) and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 20.58 cmH2O, 95% CI: 12.25-28.92) among chronic stroke patients, but no significant effects were observed for maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 11.37 cmH2O, 95% CI: -0.78-25.23). The subgroup analysis revealed that the combination of inspiratory muscle training and expiratory muscle training enhanced maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 23.47 cmH2O, 95% CI: 3.65-43.30) and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 34.00 cmH2O, 95% CI: 21.21-46.79), while inspiratory muscle training improved maximal inspiratory pressure (MD = 14.09 cmH2O, 95% CI: 7.57-20.62), maximal expiratory pressure (MD = 8.69 cmH2O, 95% CI: 0.63-16.75), and respiratory muscle endurance (MD = 16.69 cmH2O, 95% CI: 10.27-23.11). For secondary outcomes, significant improvements occurred in forced expiratory volume in 1s (MD = 0.25 L, 95% CI: 0.06-0.44) and peak expiratory flow (MD = 0.84 L/s, 95% CI: 0.31-1.37), but not in forced vital capacity (MD = 0.16 L, 95% CI: -0.08-0.41), exercise capacity (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: -0.03-0.61), and quality of life.

Conclusion: Respiratory muscle training effectively enhances primary outcomes, including maximal inspiratory pressure and respiratory muscle endurance, as well as secondary outcomes such as forced expiratory volume in 1s and peak expiratory flow in chronic stroke patients, but does not improve maximal expiratory pressure, forced vital capacity, exercise capacity, and quality of life. The combination of inspiratory muscle training with expiratory muscle training, as well as inspiratory muscle training alone, can enhance maximal inspiratory pressure and the endurance of respiratory muscles. Furthermore, inspiratory muscle training alone can improve maximal expiratory pressure.

Systematic review registration: identifier, CRD42024517859.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信