铥激光内镜整体切除与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌肉侵袭性膀胱肿瘤的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性随机试验

IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-05-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905998.2025.2501888
Mahmoud Abd El Hamid, Ahmed Abd Allah, Ahmed Assem, Mohamed Abd El Wahed, Hossam Hassan, Amr Lotfi, Ayman Kassem
{"title":"铥激光内镜整体切除与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌肉侵袭性膀胱肿瘤的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性随机试验","authors":"Mahmoud Abd El Hamid, Ahmed Abd Allah, Ahmed Assem, Mohamed Abd El Wahed, Hossam Hassan, Amr Lotfi, Ayman Kassem","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2025.2501888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) are managed with endoscopic resection and intravesical therapy. Lasers, particularly thulium and holmium, are now central to bladder tumor management. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of thulium laser enucleation of bladder tumors (Tm-LRBT).</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>A prospective randomized clinical study was conducted from June 2022 to December 2023, involving 100 patients. Group A was treated with TmLRBT and Group B with conventional monopolar TURBT. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Inclusion criteria were NMIBC, tumor size < 5 cm, and fewer than three tumors. Exclusion criteria included tumors > 5 cm, more than three tumors, invasive/upper tract cancers, hydronephrosis, metastases, and history of TURBT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor diameter in Group A was 2.3 ± 0.74 cm. The mean operative time was 45.4 ± 13.48 minutes. Re-resection within 90 days was negative for bladder cancer in all Group A patients; three patients in Group B had persistent disease. Seven Group B cases lacked muscle in the specimen compared to three in Group A. Significant intraoperative bleeding occurred in four cases in Group A and five in Group B. Tumor recurrence was 42% in Group A and 44% in Group B at 12-month follow-up. .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TmLRBT is a potential alternative to TURBT, providing accurate reporting of neoplastic depth invasion. It is advantageous, particularly for tumors in the lateral wall, bladder dome, or perimeatal zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 4","pages":"315-323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12493611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety & efficacy of thulium laser endoscopic en bloc resection versus conventional trans urethral resection of bladder tumors, for treatment of non muscle invasive bladder tumors: A prospective randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Abd El Hamid, Ahmed Abd Allah, Ahmed Assem, Mohamed Abd El Wahed, Hossam Hassan, Amr Lotfi, Ayman Kassem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20905998.2025.2501888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) are managed with endoscopic resection and intravesical therapy. Lasers, particularly thulium and holmium, are now central to bladder tumor management. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of thulium laser enucleation of bladder tumors (Tm-LRBT).</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>A prospective randomized clinical study was conducted from June 2022 to December 2023, involving 100 patients. Group A was treated with TmLRBT and Group B with conventional monopolar TURBT. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Inclusion criteria were NMIBC, tumor size < 5 cm, and fewer than three tumors. Exclusion criteria included tumors > 5 cm, more than three tumors, invasive/upper tract cancers, hydronephrosis, metastases, and history of TURBT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor diameter in Group A was 2.3 ± 0.74 cm. The mean operative time was 45.4 ± 13.48 minutes. Re-resection within 90 days was negative for bladder cancer in all Group A patients; three patients in Group B had persistent disease. Seven Group B cases lacked muscle in the specimen compared to three in Group A. Significant intraoperative bleeding occurred in four cases in Group A and five in Group B. Tumor recurrence was 42% in Group A and 44% in Group B at 12-month follow-up. .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TmLRBT is a potential alternative to TURBT, providing accurate reporting of neoplastic depth invasion. It is advantageous, particularly for tumors in the lateral wall, bladder dome, or perimeatal zone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"315-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12493611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2025.2501888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2025.2501888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(nmibc)是通过内镜切除和膀胱内治疗来治疗的。激光,特别是铥和钬,现在是膀胱肿瘤治疗的核心。本研究评价铥激光膀胱肿瘤去核术(Tm-LRBT)的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:一项前瞻性随机临床研究于2022年6月至2023年12月进行,涉及100例患者。A组采用TmLRBT治疗,B组采用常规单极TURBT治疗。获得了所有参与者的知情同意。纳入标准为NMIBC、肿瘤大小< 5 cm、小于3个肿瘤。排除标准包括肿瘤bbb50 cm、3个以上肿瘤、侵袭性/上尿路癌、肾积水、转移和turt病史。结果:A组平均肿瘤直径2.3±0.74 cm。平均手术时间45.4±13.48分钟。所有A组患者在90天内再次切除膀胱癌均为阴性;B组3例患者有持续性疾病。B组7例标本肌肉缺失,A组3例,A组4例,B组5例,术后12个月肿瘤复发率分别为42%和44%。结论:TmLRBT是替代TURBT的潜在方法,可准确报告肿瘤深度浸润。这是有利的,特别是肿瘤在侧壁,膀胱穹窿,或围膜区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety & efficacy of thulium laser endoscopic en bloc resection versus conventional trans urethral resection of bladder tumors, for treatment of non muscle invasive bladder tumors: A prospective randomized trial.

Introduction: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBCs) are managed with endoscopic resection and intravesical therapy. Lasers, particularly thulium and holmium, are now central to bladder tumor management. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of thulium laser enucleation of bladder tumors (Tm-LRBT).

Patients & methods: A prospective randomized clinical study was conducted from June 2022 to December 2023, involving 100 patients. Group A was treated with TmLRBT and Group B with conventional monopolar TURBT. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Inclusion criteria were NMIBC, tumor size < 5 cm, and fewer than three tumors. Exclusion criteria included tumors > 5 cm, more than three tumors, invasive/upper tract cancers, hydronephrosis, metastases, and history of TURBT.

Results: The mean tumor diameter in Group A was 2.3 ± 0.74 cm. The mean operative time was 45.4 ± 13.48 minutes. Re-resection within 90 days was negative for bladder cancer in all Group A patients; three patients in Group B had persistent disease. Seven Group B cases lacked muscle in the specimen compared to three in Group A. Significant intraoperative bleeding occurred in four cases in Group A and five in Group B. Tumor recurrence was 42% in Group A and 44% in Group B at 12-month follow-up. .

Conclusion: TmLRBT is a potential alternative to TURBT, providing accurate reporting of neoplastic depth invasion. It is advantageous, particularly for tumors in the lateral wall, bladder dome, or perimeatal zone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信