中国的二孩政策能扭转生育率下降的趋势吗?对生育行为和欲望的深入分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xuehao Huang
{"title":"中国的二孩政策能扭转生育率下降的趋势吗?对生育行为和欲望的深入分析。","authors":"Xuehao Huang","doi":"10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i9.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilizes data from the 2014 and 2018 waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) and applies Difference-in Differences (DID) and Propensity Score Matching-Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) methods to conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of the universal two-child policy on fertility behavior and family fertility desires in China. The results indicate that although the universal two-child policy aims to increase birth rates, its effects have fallen short of desires. The relaxation of policy restrictions did not significantly encourage families to have a second child and even reduced the desired number of children per family. This study further reveals the complexities and heterogeneity in the policy's implementation, influenced by intersecting economic, social, and cultural factors, thus providing a new perspective for understanding the impact of the universal two-child policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7551,"journal":{"name":"African journal of reproductive health","volume":"29 9","pages":"74-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can China's two-child policy reverse fertility decline? An in-depth analysis of fertility behavior and desires.\",\"authors\":\"Xuehao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i9.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study utilizes data from the 2014 and 2018 waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) and applies Difference-in Differences (DID) and Propensity Score Matching-Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) methods to conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of the universal two-child policy on fertility behavior and family fertility desires in China. The results indicate that although the universal two-child policy aims to increase birth rates, its effects have fallen short of desires. The relaxation of policy restrictions did not significantly encourage families to have a second child and even reduced the desired number of children per family. This study further reveals the complexities and heterogeneity in the policy's implementation, influenced by intersecting economic, social, and cultural factors, thus providing a new perspective for understanding the impact of the universal two-child policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African journal of reproductive health\",\"volume\":\"29 9\",\"pages\":\"74-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African journal of reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i9.8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i9.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用2014年和2018年中国家庭面板研究(CFPS)的数据,运用差分法(DID)和倾向得分匹配差分法(PSM-DID)深入分析全面二孩政策对中国生育行为和家庭生育意愿的影响。结果表明,虽然全面二孩政策的目的是提高出生率,但其效果并没有达到预期。政策限制的放宽并没有显著鼓励家庭生二胎,甚至降低了每个家庭的理想子女数量。本研究进一步揭示了受经济、社会和文化因素影响的全面二孩政策实施的复杂性和异质性,从而为理解全面二孩政策的影响提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can China's two-child policy reverse fertility decline? An in-depth analysis of fertility behavior and desires.

This study utilizes data from the 2014 and 2018 waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) and applies Difference-in Differences (DID) and Propensity Score Matching-Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) methods to conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of the universal two-child policy on fertility behavior and family fertility desires in China. The results indicate that although the universal two-child policy aims to increase birth rates, its effects have fallen short of desires. The relaxation of policy restrictions did not significantly encourage families to have a second child and even reduced the desired number of children per family. This study further reveals the complexities and heterogeneity in the policy's implementation, influenced by intersecting economic, social, and cultural factors, thus providing a new perspective for understanding the impact of the universal two-child policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African journal of reproductive health
African journal of reproductive health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Reproductive Health is a multidisciplinary and international journal that publishes original research, comprehensive review articles, short reports, and commentaries on reproductive heath in Africa. The journal strives to provide a forum for African authors, as well as others working in Africa, to share findings on all aspects of reproductive health, and to disseminate innovative, relevant and useful information on reproductive health throughout the continent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信