对可持续平台化学品研究主题的兴起,统治和撤退的全球分析。

IF 9.2 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI:10.1039/D5GC02863A
Paul Tautorat, Benedetta Tremolada, Antonio J. Martín, Lucas F. Santos, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, Javier Pérez-Ramírez and Bjarne Steffen
{"title":"对可持续平台化学品研究主题的兴起,统治和撤退的全球分析。","authors":"Paul Tautorat, Benedetta Tremolada, Antonio J. Martín, Lucas F. Santos, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, Javier Pérez-Ramírez and Bjarne Steffen","doi":"10.1039/D5GC02863A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Platform chemicals—such as olefins, ammonia, aromatics, and methanol—serve as fundamental building blocks for the chemical industry. At the same time, they account for 4% of global CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> emissions, highlighting the need for renewable feedstocks, renewable energy, or other alternative approaches to develop more sustainable production routes toward carbon neutrality. Despite substantial research output, we lack a holistic understanding of where innovation is heading. This gap leaves research planning and policy decisions without a quantitative basis for understanding the directions of innovation. A better understanding of how they differ between platform chemicals is critical for delineating policies and strategic plans toward a net-zero future. Our study addresses this gap by providing unprecedented clarity on global research trends in platform chemicals spanning the last three decades since the establishment of the Green Chemistry principles and other subsequent sustainability approaches for chemical systems, showing the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in this area. For this purpose, we develop a novel approach by integrating topic modelling, generative AI, and expert judgment to analyse &gt;90 000 research articles from Scopus, identifying 62 distinct research topics and tracking their temporal and geographical trends. Our results reveal different innovation patterns across the four platform chemicals. Driven by the concepts of an ammonia or methanol economy, research output has increased for these platform chemicals by a factor of 17 and 6 between 2000 and 2024, respectively. This growth has been led by new strategies like photo- and electrochemical routes, which now account for approximately 65% of ammonia-related research. For olefins and aromatics, innovation patterns show less momentum as research has rather focused on optimising available technologies. Reliance on existing alternative routes (based on renewable methanol) and olefins and aromatics’ molecular complexity could explain this lower momentum. Our quantitative findings can help define research priorities for green chemistry and derive the implications of emerging technological trends on industrial systems regarding future electricity, biomass, and feedstock demand.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 41","pages":" 12985-13003"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A global analysis of the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in research toward sustainable platform chemicals\",\"authors\":\"Paul Tautorat, Benedetta Tremolada, Antonio J. Martín, Lucas F. Santos, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, Javier Pérez-Ramírez and Bjarne Steffen\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5GC02863A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Platform chemicals—such as olefins, ammonia, aromatics, and methanol—serve as fundamental building blocks for the chemical industry. At the same time, they account for 4% of global CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> emissions, highlighting the need for renewable feedstocks, renewable energy, or other alternative approaches to develop more sustainable production routes toward carbon neutrality. Despite substantial research output, we lack a holistic understanding of where innovation is heading. This gap leaves research planning and policy decisions without a quantitative basis for understanding the directions of innovation. A better understanding of how they differ between platform chemicals is critical for delineating policies and strategic plans toward a net-zero future. Our study addresses this gap by providing unprecedented clarity on global research trends in platform chemicals spanning the last three decades since the establishment of the Green Chemistry principles and other subsequent sustainability approaches for chemical systems, showing the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in this area. For this purpose, we develop a novel approach by integrating topic modelling, generative AI, and expert judgment to analyse &gt;90 000 research articles from Scopus, identifying 62 distinct research topics and tracking their temporal and geographical trends. Our results reveal different innovation patterns across the four platform chemicals. Driven by the concepts of an ammonia or methanol economy, research output has increased for these platform chemicals by a factor of 17 and 6 between 2000 and 2024, respectively. This growth has been led by new strategies like photo- and electrochemical routes, which now account for approximately 65% of ammonia-related research. For olefins and aromatics, innovation patterns show less momentum as research has rather focused on optimising available technologies. Reliance on existing alternative routes (based on renewable methanol) and olefins and aromatics’ molecular complexity could explain this lower momentum. Our quantitative findings can help define research priorities for green chemistry and derive the implications of emerging technological trends on industrial systems regarding future electricity, biomass, and feedstock demand.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" 41\",\"pages\":\" 12985-13003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc02863a\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc02863a","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平台化学品——如烯烃、氨、芳烃和甲醇——是化学工业的基本组成部分。与此同时,它们占全球二氧化碳排放量的4%,这凸显了对可再生原料、可再生能源或其他替代方法的需求,以开发更可持续的生产路线,实现碳中和。尽管有大量的研究成果,但我们对创新的方向缺乏全面的了解。这一差距使得研究规划和政策决策没有定量基础来理解创新的方向。更好地了解平台化学品之间的差异,对于制定政策和战略计划以实现净零排放的未来至关重要。我们的研究解决了这一差距,为平台化学品的全球研究趋势提供了前所未有的清晰度,自绿色化学原则和其他后续化学系统的可持续性方法建立以来,跨越过去三十年,显示了该领域主题的兴起,统治和撤退。为此,我们开发了一种新颖的方法,通过集成主题建模,生成式人工智能和专家判断来分析来自Scopus的bb90000篇研究文章,确定62个不同的研究主题并跟踪其时间和地理趋势。我们的研究结果揭示了四种平台化学品的不同创新模式。在氨或甲醇经济概念的推动下,这些平台化学品的研究产出在2000年至2024年间分别增长了17倍和6倍。这种增长是由新的策略,如光和电化学路线,现在占大约65%的氨相关研究的主导。对于烯烃和芳烃,创新模式表现出较少的动力,因为研究主要集中在优化现有技术上。对现有替代路线(基于可再生甲醇)以及烯烃和芳烃分子复杂性的依赖可以解释这种较低的动力。我们的定量研究结果可以帮助确定绿色化学的研究重点,并得出新兴技术趋势对工业系统有关未来电力、生物质和原料需求的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A global analysis of the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in research toward sustainable platform chemicals

A global analysis of the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in research toward sustainable platform chemicals

Platform chemicals—such as olefins, ammonia, aromatics, and methanol—serve as fundamental building blocks for the chemical industry. At the same time, they account for 4% of global CO2 emissions, highlighting the need for renewable feedstocks, renewable energy, or other alternative approaches to develop more sustainable production routes toward carbon neutrality. Despite substantial research output, we lack a holistic understanding of where innovation is heading. This gap leaves research planning and policy decisions without a quantitative basis for understanding the directions of innovation. A better understanding of how they differ between platform chemicals is critical for delineating policies and strategic plans toward a net-zero future. Our study addresses this gap by providing unprecedented clarity on global research trends in platform chemicals spanning the last three decades since the establishment of the Green Chemistry principles and other subsequent sustainability approaches for chemical systems, showing the rise, reign, and retreat of topics in this area. For this purpose, we develop a novel approach by integrating topic modelling, generative AI, and expert judgment to analyse >90 000 research articles from Scopus, identifying 62 distinct research topics and tracking their temporal and geographical trends. Our results reveal different innovation patterns across the four platform chemicals. Driven by the concepts of an ammonia or methanol economy, research output has increased for these platform chemicals by a factor of 17 and 6 between 2000 and 2024, respectively. This growth has been led by new strategies like photo- and electrochemical routes, which now account for approximately 65% of ammonia-related research. For olefins and aromatics, innovation patterns show less momentum as research has rather focused on optimising available technologies. Reliance on existing alternative routes (based on renewable methanol) and olefins and aromatics’ molecular complexity could explain this lower momentum. Our quantitative findings can help define research priorities for green chemistry and derive the implications of emerging technological trends on industrial systems regarding future electricity, biomass, and feedstock demand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信