greena:评价LEED绿色建筑可持续性的生态网络分析

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Emily Payne, Astrid Layton
{"title":"greena:评价LEED绿色建筑可持续性的生态网络分析","authors":"Emily Payne,&nbsp;Astrid Layton","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustainability and resilience are essential for extending a building's lifespan and protecting both people and the environment. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a widely used green building certification that aims to align projects with future climate and energy goals. However, many LEED credits do not fully reflect the principles of long-term sustainability. LEED credits were compared to ecological food web structures using ecological network analysis (ENA) to better assess building sustainability, a method that emphasizes system-level balance and resource cycling. When applied to LEED scorecards for 1266 newly constructed buildings, ENA revealed that restructuring credits based on system impact, particularly cyclicity, provides a clearer picture of building performance. The proposed grENA model showed an increase in system cyclicity from 1.00 in LEED to 4.18, capturing critical community-level effects. Ecological networks often exhibit higher cyclicity due to organized recycling, a feature largely underrepresented in current LEED priorities. Results also showed that 37% of buildings had inflated LEED certifications, indicating misalignment between awarded points and true sustainability. The proposed model supports more resilient building design by emphasizing balanced subsystems and community integration. These findings highlight the value of sustainable urbanism, where features like green spaces, efficient public transport, and mixed-use developments enhance livability while minimizing environmental impact. A holistic, systems-based approach ensures that buildings not only meet energy goals but also contribute positively to their broader urban ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1776-1790"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"grENA: Ecological network analysis to assess LEED green buildings’ sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Emily Payne,&nbsp;Astrid Layton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sustainability and resilience are essential for extending a building's lifespan and protecting both people and the environment. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a widely used green building certification that aims to align projects with future climate and energy goals. However, many LEED credits do not fully reflect the principles of long-term sustainability. LEED credits were compared to ecological food web structures using ecological network analysis (ENA) to better assess building sustainability, a method that emphasizes system-level balance and resource cycling. When applied to LEED scorecards for 1266 newly constructed buildings, ENA revealed that restructuring credits based on system impact, particularly cyclicity, provides a clearer picture of building performance. The proposed grENA model showed an increase in system cyclicity from 1.00 in LEED to 4.18, capturing critical community-level effects. Ecological networks often exhibit higher cyclicity due to organized recycling, a feature largely underrepresented in current LEED priorities. Results also showed that 37% of buildings had inflated LEED certifications, indicating misalignment between awarded points and true sustainability. The proposed model supports more resilient building design by emphasizing balanced subsystems and community integration. These findings highlight the value of sustainable urbanism, where features like green spaces, efficient public transport, and mixed-use developments enhance livability while minimizing environmental impact. A holistic, systems-based approach ensures that buildings not only meet energy goals but also contribute positively to their broader urban ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1776-1790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70083\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续性和弹性对于延长建筑的使用寿命、保护人类和环境至关重要。能源与环境设计领导力(LEED)是一种广泛使用的绿色建筑认证,旨在使项目与未来的气候和能源目标保持一致。然而,许多LEED学分并没有完全反映长期可持续性的原则。利用生态网络分析(ENA)将LEED信用与生态食物网结构进行比较,以更好地评估建筑的可持续性,这是一种强调系统级平衡和资源循环的方法。当应用于1266个新建建筑的LEED记分卡时,ENA透露,基于系统影响的重组积分,特别是周期性,提供了一个更清晰的建筑性能图像。提出的grENA模型显示,系统循环度从LEED的1.00增加到4.18,捕捉到了关键的社区水平效应。由于有组织的回收利用,生态网络通常表现出更高的循环性,这一特征在当前的LEED优先级中基本上没有得到充分体现。结果还显示,37%的建筑夸大了LEED认证,这表明得分与真正的可持续性之间存在偏差。提出的模型通过强调平衡的子系统和社区整合来支持更具弹性的建筑设计。这些发现突出了可持续城市主义的价值,其中绿色空间、高效公共交通和混合用途开发等特征在最大限度地减少环境影响的同时提高了宜居性。一个整体的、基于系统的方法确保建筑不仅满足能源目标,而且对更广泛的城市生态系统做出积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

grENA: Ecological network analysis to assess LEED green buildings’ sustainability

grENA: Ecological network analysis to assess LEED green buildings’ sustainability

Sustainability and resilience are essential for extending a building's lifespan and protecting both people and the environment. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is a widely used green building certification that aims to align projects with future climate and energy goals. However, many LEED credits do not fully reflect the principles of long-term sustainability. LEED credits were compared to ecological food web structures using ecological network analysis (ENA) to better assess building sustainability, a method that emphasizes system-level balance and resource cycling. When applied to LEED scorecards for 1266 newly constructed buildings, ENA revealed that restructuring credits based on system impact, particularly cyclicity, provides a clearer picture of building performance. The proposed grENA model showed an increase in system cyclicity from 1.00 in LEED to 4.18, capturing critical community-level effects. Ecological networks often exhibit higher cyclicity due to organized recycling, a feature largely underrepresented in current LEED priorities. Results also showed that 37% of buildings had inflated LEED certifications, indicating misalignment between awarded points and true sustainability. The proposed model supports more resilient building design by emphasizing balanced subsystems and community integration. These findings highlight the value of sustainable urbanism, where features like green spaces, efficient public transport, and mixed-use developments enhance livability while minimizing environmental impact. A holistic, systems-based approach ensures that buildings not only meet energy goals but also contribute positively to their broader urban ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信