协同的部门行动可以加速消费密集型地区的碳减排

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yujia Xiao, Minggao Xue, Xiaoling Zhang
{"title":"协同的部门行动可以加速消费密集型地区的碳减排","authors":"Yujia Xiao,&nbsp;Minggao Xue,&nbsp;Xiaoling Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cities play a pivotal role in global carbon mitigation, but conventional accounting approaches often obscure the responsibilities of sectors that consume energy without directly emitting, particularly in service-oriented urban systems. This study develops a seven-step analytical framework centered on the scope-based emissions method to address the resulting mismatch between sectoral functions and carbon responsibilities in consumption-driven cities. Applied to Hong Kong, the framework reallocates indirect emissions based on inter-sectoral electricity flows and reduces the supply-to-demand emission distribution from 3.52 to 1.25, promoting a fairer distribution of emission responsibilities among sectors. Beyond tracing emission dynamics, it simulates mitigation scenarios under shared socioeconomic pathways to assess the value of cross-sectoral coordination. Results show that redistributing responsibilities and enhancing cross-sectoral collaboration can improve city-level mitigation performance, with synergistic policies projected to reduce emissions by 37.3% and 19.1% by 2050 compared to limited or no coordination. These findings underscore the value of integrating emission analysis with governance needs, offering an actionable tool to reassign responsibilities and coordinate mitigation in cities where sectoral misalignment hinders climate action.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1718-1735"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic sectoral actions can accelerate carbon reduction in consumption-intensive regions\",\"authors\":\"Yujia Xiao,&nbsp;Minggao Xue,&nbsp;Xiaoling Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.70078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cities play a pivotal role in global carbon mitigation, but conventional accounting approaches often obscure the responsibilities of sectors that consume energy without directly emitting, particularly in service-oriented urban systems. This study develops a seven-step analytical framework centered on the scope-based emissions method to address the resulting mismatch between sectoral functions and carbon responsibilities in consumption-driven cities. Applied to Hong Kong, the framework reallocates indirect emissions based on inter-sectoral electricity flows and reduces the supply-to-demand emission distribution from 3.52 to 1.25, promoting a fairer distribution of emission responsibilities among sectors. Beyond tracing emission dynamics, it simulates mitigation scenarios under shared socioeconomic pathways to assess the value of cross-sectoral coordination. Results show that redistributing responsibilities and enhancing cross-sectoral collaboration can improve city-level mitigation performance, with synergistic policies projected to reduce emissions by 37.3% and 19.1% by 2050 compared to limited or no coordination. These findings underscore the value of integrating emission analysis with governance needs, offering an actionable tool to reassign responsibilities and coordinate mitigation in cities where sectoral misalignment hinders climate action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1718-1735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70078\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70078\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市在全球碳减排中发挥着关键作用,但传统的核算方法往往掩盖了消耗能源但不直接排放的部门的责任,特别是在服务型城市系统中。本研究开发了一个以基于范围的排放方法为中心的七步分析框架,以解决消费驱动型城市中部门职能与碳责任之间的不匹配问题。该框架适用于香港,根据行业间的电力流动重新分配间接排放,并将供需排放分配从3.52降至1.25,促进行业间更公平的排放责任分配。除了追踪排放动态之外,它还模拟了共享社会经济途径下的缓解情景,以评估跨部门协调的价值。结果表明,责任再分配和加强跨部门协作可以提高城市层面的减排绩效,与有限协调或不协调相比,协同政策预计到2050年将减少37.3%和19.1%的排放量。这些调查结果强调了将排放分析与治理需求结合起来的价值,为部门失调阻碍气候行动的城市重新分配责任和协调缓解措施提供了一种可行的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Synergistic sectoral actions can accelerate carbon reduction in consumption-intensive regions

Synergistic sectoral actions can accelerate carbon reduction in consumption-intensive regions

Cities play a pivotal role in global carbon mitigation, but conventional accounting approaches often obscure the responsibilities of sectors that consume energy without directly emitting, particularly in service-oriented urban systems. This study develops a seven-step analytical framework centered on the scope-based emissions method to address the resulting mismatch between sectoral functions and carbon responsibilities in consumption-driven cities. Applied to Hong Kong, the framework reallocates indirect emissions based on inter-sectoral electricity flows and reduces the supply-to-demand emission distribution from 3.52 to 1.25, promoting a fairer distribution of emission responsibilities among sectors. Beyond tracing emission dynamics, it simulates mitigation scenarios under shared socioeconomic pathways to assess the value of cross-sectoral coordination. Results show that redistributing responsibilities and enhancing cross-sectoral collaboration can improve city-level mitigation performance, with synergistic policies projected to reduce emissions by 37.3% and 19.1% by 2050 compared to limited or no coordination. These findings underscore the value of integrating emission analysis with governance needs, offering an actionable tool to reassign responsibilities and coordinate mitigation in cities where sectoral misalignment hinders climate action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信