四个发达国家的生物物理经济结构:脱碳的教训

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Rajib Sinha, Christopher Kennedy
{"title":"四个发达国家的生物物理经济结构:脱碳的教训","authors":"Rajib Sinha,&nbsp;Christopher Kennedy","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provides a comparative analysis of the biophysical economic structures of four developed economies—Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. We draw upon results from input–output models to map and analyze capital, energy, and carbon relationships in each economy. The capital stock of each country is divided into four sectors: (i) energy production and distribution, (ii) production of goods and services for consumption, (iii) residential, and (iv) construction and manufacture of capital. The findings reveal diverse strengths and challenges in decarbonization efforts across the countries. Sweden excels in “energy production and distribution” and “residential” sectors, owing to its commitment to renewable energy and energy efficiency, but requires attention in goods and services production where carbon intensity is high. The United Kingdom stands out for its high greenhouse gas intensity in residential capital stock and in the consumption of goods and services, underscoring the need for targeted low-carbon investments. The United States and Canada display high GHG intensities across all sectors, necessitating a more robust transition toward renewable and low-carbon energy solutions. In particular, the United States’ carbon intensity in its energy sector and Canada's industry dominated by fossil fuel extraction offer specific areas for intervention. The study concludes that focusing on sectors with the highest carbon intensity and adopting both sector-specific and broader strategies can significantly accelerate each country's decarbonization efforts, thereby contributing to global climate change mitigation. This article met the requirements for a gold-gold <i>JIE</i> data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.</p><p></p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 5","pages":"1601-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70062","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The biophysical economic structure of four developed countries: Lessons for decarbonization\",\"authors\":\"Rajib Sinha,&nbsp;Christopher Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.70062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study provides a comparative analysis of the biophysical economic structures of four developed economies—Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. We draw upon results from input–output models to map and analyze capital, energy, and carbon relationships in each economy. The capital stock of each country is divided into four sectors: (i) energy production and distribution, (ii) production of goods and services for consumption, (iii) residential, and (iv) construction and manufacture of capital. The findings reveal diverse strengths and challenges in decarbonization efforts across the countries. Sweden excels in “energy production and distribution” and “residential” sectors, owing to its commitment to renewable energy and energy efficiency, but requires attention in goods and services production where carbon intensity is high. The United Kingdom stands out for its high greenhouse gas intensity in residential capital stock and in the consumption of goods and services, underscoring the need for targeted low-carbon investments. The United States and Canada display high GHG intensities across all sectors, necessitating a more robust transition toward renewable and low-carbon energy solutions. In particular, the United States’ carbon intensity in its energy sector and Canada's industry dominated by fossil fuel extraction offer specific areas for intervention. The study concludes that focusing on sectors with the highest carbon intensity and adopting both sector-specific and broader strategies can significantly accelerate each country's decarbonization efforts, thereby contributing to global climate change mitigation. This article met the requirements for a gold-gold <i>JIE</i> data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.</p><p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1601-1617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70062\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对四个发达经济体——瑞典、美国、英国和加拿大的生物物理经济结构进行了比较分析。我们利用投入产出模型的结果来绘制和分析每个经济体的资本、能源和碳关系。每个国家的资本存量分为四个部门:(i)能源生产和分配,(ii)消费商品和服务的生产,(iii)住宅,(iv)资本的建设和制造。研究结果揭示了各国在脱碳方面的不同优势和挑战。由于对可再生能源和能源效率的承诺,瑞典在“能源生产和分配”和“住宅”部门表现出色,但需要注意碳强度高的商品和服务生产。英国在住宅资本存量和商品和服务消费方面的温室气体强度很高,这突出了有针对性的低碳投资的必要性。美国和加拿大在所有行业的温室气体排放强度都很高,因此有必要更有力地向可再生能源和低碳能源解决方案过渡。特别是,美国能源部门的碳强度和加拿大以化石燃料开采为主的工业提供了具体的干预领域。该研究的结论是,关注碳强度最高的部门,采取针对特定部门和更广泛的战略,可以大大加快各国的脱碳努力,从而为减缓全球气候变化作出贡献。本文符合http://jie.click/badges上描述的金牌JIE数据开放徽章的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The biophysical economic structure of four developed countries: Lessons for decarbonization

The biophysical economic structure of four developed countries: Lessons for decarbonization

This study provides a comparative analysis of the biophysical economic structures of four developed economies—Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. We draw upon results from input–output models to map and analyze capital, energy, and carbon relationships in each economy. The capital stock of each country is divided into four sectors: (i) energy production and distribution, (ii) production of goods and services for consumption, (iii) residential, and (iv) construction and manufacture of capital. The findings reveal diverse strengths and challenges in decarbonization efforts across the countries. Sweden excels in “energy production and distribution” and “residential” sectors, owing to its commitment to renewable energy and energy efficiency, but requires attention in goods and services production where carbon intensity is high. The United Kingdom stands out for its high greenhouse gas intensity in residential capital stock and in the consumption of goods and services, underscoring the need for targeted low-carbon investments. The United States and Canada display high GHG intensities across all sectors, necessitating a more robust transition toward renewable and low-carbon energy solutions. In particular, the United States’ carbon intensity in its energy sector and Canada's industry dominated by fossil fuel extraction offer specific areas for intervention. The study concludes that focusing on sectors with the highest carbon intensity and adopting both sector-specific and broader strategies can significantly accelerate each country's decarbonization efforts, thereby contributing to global climate change mitigation. This article met the requirements for a gold-gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信