水产养殖尾水中氮的去除:生物絮凝剂与动物藻颗粒性能及内在机制的比较

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Xiufang Yang , Wenping Xie , Jun Xie , Junda Lu , Junlin Li , Yun Xia , Wangbao Gong , Xiaojun Niu , Zhifei Li
{"title":"水产养殖尾水中氮的去除:生物絮凝剂与动物藻颗粒性能及内在机制的比较","authors":"Xiufang Yang ,&nbsp;Wenping Xie ,&nbsp;Jun Xie ,&nbsp;Junda Lu ,&nbsp;Junlin Li ,&nbsp;Yun Xia ,&nbsp;Wangbao Gong ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Niu ,&nbsp;Zhifei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective nitrogen removal from aquaculture tailwater is crucial to sustainable aquaculture. Bioflocs and zoogloea granules, two distinct microbial aggregates, are known to mediate nitrogen removal under high- and low-carbon conditions, respectively. However, the differences in nitrogen removal efficiency and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study provided the first comparison of the nitrogen removal performance of these two aggregates in tailwater, and combined with their physicochemical properties, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and metagenomic analysis, aimed to reveal their underlying mechanisms. Results showed that bioflocs had a significantly larger average particle size than zoogloea granules (224 μm vs. 80 μm, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), with a looser structure, a higher proportion of viable cells, and inferior sedimentation performance. Bioflocs also exhibited a significantly higher 24-h TN removal rate than zoogloea granules (69.92 % vs. 45.22 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). During the nitrogen removal process, bioflocs secreted more EPS to stabilize structures and store carbon, whereas zoogloea granules degraded EPS to supply energy for denitrification. Metagenomics revealed that bioflocs were dominated by <em>Nakamurella</em> (39.41 %) and showed a dominant heterotrophic ammonia assimilation. In contrast, zoogloea granules hosted a more diverse and stable microbial community (dominated by <em>Candidatus</em> Promineifilum) that facilitated nitrogen removal through a synergistic interplay of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)-mediated assimilation, nitrification, and denitrification. These findings provide new insights into the distinct nitrogen removal processes, offering a basis for technology selection and process optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 108864"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen removal in aquaculture tailwater: Comparison of the performance and intrinsic mechanisms of bioflocs versus zoogloea granules\",\"authors\":\"Xiufang Yang ,&nbsp;Wenping Xie ,&nbsp;Jun Xie ,&nbsp;Junda Lu ,&nbsp;Junlin Li ,&nbsp;Yun Xia ,&nbsp;Wangbao Gong ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Niu ,&nbsp;Zhifei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effective nitrogen removal from aquaculture tailwater is crucial to sustainable aquaculture. Bioflocs and zoogloea granules, two distinct microbial aggregates, are known to mediate nitrogen removal under high- and low-carbon conditions, respectively. However, the differences in nitrogen removal efficiency and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study provided the first comparison of the nitrogen removal performance of these two aggregates in tailwater, and combined with their physicochemical properties, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and metagenomic analysis, aimed to reveal their underlying mechanisms. Results showed that bioflocs had a significantly larger average particle size than zoogloea granules (224 μm vs. 80 μm, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), with a looser structure, a higher proportion of viable cells, and inferior sedimentation performance. Bioflocs also exhibited a significantly higher 24-h TN removal rate than zoogloea granules (69.92 % vs. 45.22 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). During the nitrogen removal process, bioflocs secreted more EPS to stabilize structures and store carbon, whereas zoogloea granules degraded EPS to supply energy for denitrification. Metagenomics revealed that bioflocs were dominated by <em>Nakamurella</em> (39.41 %) and showed a dominant heterotrophic ammonia assimilation. In contrast, zoogloea granules hosted a more diverse and stable microbial community (dominated by <em>Candidatus</em> Promineifilum) that facilitated nitrogen removal through a synergistic interplay of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)-mediated assimilation, nitrification, and denitrification. These findings provide new insights into the distinct nitrogen removal processes, offering a basis for technology selection and process optimization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425019373\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425019373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水产养殖尾水中有效脱氮对水产养殖的可持续发展至关重要。生物絮团和动物团颗粒是两种不同的微生物聚集体,分别在高碳和低碳条件下介导氮的去除。然而,脱氮效率的差异和潜在的机制尚不清楚。本研究首次比较了这两种聚集体在尾水中的脱氮性能,并结合它们的理化性质、胞外聚合物质(EPS)和宏基因组分析,旨在揭示它们的潜在机制。结果表明,生物絮团的平均粒径明显大于zoogloea颗粒(224 μm vs 80 μm, P < 0.05),且结构更疏松,活细胞比例更高,沉降性能较差。生物絮凝剂的24小时TN去除率也显著高于zoogloea颗粒(69.92% vs. 45.22%, P < 0.05)。在脱氮过程中,生物絮团分泌更多的EPS来稳定结构和储存碳,而游动藻颗粒降解EPS为反硝化提供能量。宏基因组学显示,生物絮团以中氏菌(39.41%)为主,表现出异养氨同化的优势。相比之下,zoogloea颗粒拥有更多样化和稳定的微生物群落(以Candidatus珥珥菌为主),通过谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)介导的同化、硝化和反硝化的协同相互作用,促进了氮的去除。这些发现为不同的脱氮工艺提供了新的见解,为技术选择和工艺优化提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nitrogen removal in aquaculture tailwater: Comparison of the performance and intrinsic mechanisms of bioflocs versus zoogloea granules

Nitrogen removal in aquaculture tailwater: Comparison of the performance and intrinsic mechanisms of bioflocs versus zoogloea granules
Effective nitrogen removal from aquaculture tailwater is crucial to sustainable aquaculture. Bioflocs and zoogloea granules, two distinct microbial aggregates, are known to mediate nitrogen removal under high- and low-carbon conditions, respectively. However, the differences in nitrogen removal efficiency and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study provided the first comparison of the nitrogen removal performance of these two aggregates in tailwater, and combined with their physicochemical properties, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and metagenomic analysis, aimed to reveal their underlying mechanisms. Results showed that bioflocs had a significantly larger average particle size than zoogloea granules (224 μm vs. 80 μm, P < 0.05), with a looser structure, a higher proportion of viable cells, and inferior sedimentation performance. Bioflocs also exhibited a significantly higher 24-h TN removal rate than zoogloea granules (69.92 % vs. 45.22 %, P < 0.05). During the nitrogen removal process, bioflocs secreted more EPS to stabilize structures and store carbon, whereas zoogloea granules degraded EPS to supply energy for denitrification. Metagenomics revealed that bioflocs were dominated by Nakamurella (39.41 %) and showed a dominant heterotrophic ammonia assimilation. In contrast, zoogloea granules hosted a more diverse and stable microbial community (dominated by Candidatus Promineifilum) that facilitated nitrogen removal through a synergistic interplay of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)-mediated assimilation, nitrification, and denitrification. These findings provide new insights into the distinct nitrogen removal processes, offering a basis for technology selection and process optimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of water process engineering
Journal of water process engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
846
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信