Erica Lo DMD, MA, Peter D. Mills PhD, MS, Edward E. Yackel DNP, FNP-C
{"title":"退伍军人健康管理局牙齿不良事件分析","authors":"Erica Lo DMD, MA, Peter D. Mills PhD, MS, Edward E. Yackel DNP, FNP-C","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Information on patient safety in dentistry is limited. Few dentists work in a place with incident reporting, thus, studying safety events is a challenge. The authors analyzed dental adverse events that rose to the level of root cause analyses that occurred in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The authors aimed to identify the most common adverse events, their causes, and recommended actions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors searched the VHA national database for reports of dental adverse events from January 1, 2021, through November 18, 2024. Reports were included if they occurred in the dental clinic, operating room, or care facility and were related to a procedure or dental prosthesis. There were 42 eligible reports. The authors developed a codebook to qualitatively analyze the root cause analyses according to the event types that emerged thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most frequently occurring safety incident was wrong-site surgery (40.48%), followed by ingestion (19.05%) and the use of inadequately sterilized equipment (7.14%). Lack of policy was the most common cause of adverse events and the action most recommended was to develop or review a protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An analysis in the VHA revealed the most frequent adverse event was wrong-site surgery. Additional studies in the general public are recommended to compare findings.</div></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><div>The authors provide insight into the nature of adverse events, although there are limitations to this study because reporting remains voluntary. The findings should encourage discourse on how dental offices can seek to improve patient safety and safety culture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":"156 10","pages":"Pages 851-861.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of dental adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration\",\"authors\":\"Erica Lo DMD, MA, Peter D. Mills PhD, MS, Edward E. Yackel DNP, FNP-C\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adaj.2025.07.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Information on patient safety in dentistry is limited. Few dentists work in a place with incident reporting, thus, studying safety events is a challenge. The authors analyzed dental adverse events that rose to the level of root cause analyses that occurred in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The authors aimed to identify the most common adverse events, their causes, and recommended actions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors searched the VHA national database for reports of dental adverse events from January 1, 2021, through November 18, 2024. Reports were included if they occurred in the dental clinic, operating room, or care facility and were related to a procedure or dental prosthesis. There were 42 eligible reports. The authors developed a codebook to qualitatively analyze the root cause analyses according to the event types that emerged thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most frequently occurring safety incident was wrong-site surgery (40.48%), followed by ingestion (19.05%) and the use of inadequately sterilized equipment (7.14%). Lack of policy was the most common cause of adverse events and the action most recommended was to develop or review a protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An analysis in the VHA revealed the most frequent adverse event was wrong-site surgery. Additional studies in the general public are recommended to compare findings.</div></div><div><h3>Practical Implications</h3><div>The authors provide insight into the nature of adverse events, although there are limitations to this study because reporting remains voluntary. The findings should encourage discourse on how dental offices can seek to improve patient safety and safety culture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"volume\":\"156 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 851-861.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817725004593\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817725004593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
An analysis of dental adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration
Background
Information on patient safety in dentistry is limited. Few dentists work in a place with incident reporting, thus, studying safety events is a challenge. The authors analyzed dental adverse events that rose to the level of root cause analyses that occurred in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The authors aimed to identify the most common adverse events, their causes, and recommended actions.
Methods
The authors searched the VHA national database for reports of dental adverse events from January 1, 2021, through November 18, 2024. Reports were included if they occurred in the dental clinic, operating room, or care facility and were related to a procedure or dental prosthesis. There were 42 eligible reports. The authors developed a codebook to qualitatively analyze the root cause analyses according to the event types that emerged thematically.
Results
The most frequently occurring safety incident was wrong-site surgery (40.48%), followed by ingestion (19.05%) and the use of inadequately sterilized equipment (7.14%). Lack of policy was the most common cause of adverse events and the action most recommended was to develop or review a protocol.
Conclusions
An analysis in the VHA revealed the most frequent adverse event was wrong-site surgery. Additional studies in the general public are recommended to compare findings.
Practical Implications
The authors provide insight into the nature of adverse events, although there are limitations to this study because reporting remains voluntary. The findings should encourage discourse on how dental offices can seek to improve patient safety and safety culture.
期刊介绍:
There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.