影响口服尼古丁袋装产品中尼古丁渗透的因素评价

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.5c06007
Xia “Summer” Li, , , Akchara Sriram, , , Shuzhong “Mark” Zhuang, , and , Fadi Aldeek*, 
{"title":"影响口服尼古丁袋装产品中尼古丁渗透的因素评价","authors":"Xia “Summer” Li,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Akchara Sriram,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Shuzhong “Mark” Zhuang,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Fadi Aldeek*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.5c06007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In recent years, oral nicotine pouches or “tobacco-free nicotine pouches” have emerged as potential reduced-risk alternatives to traditional tobacco products. The aim of this research was to evaluate and further develop laboratory tools to measure the nicotine release rate from nicotine pouches and its permeation through the oral mucosa. For this, we evaluated the nicotine dissolution rate and buccal permeability of three nicotine pouch brands: <i>Zyn</i>, <i>Velo</i>, and <i>Dryft</i> nicotine pouches. Dissolution testing was conducted using the United States Pharmacopeia 4 (USP-4) apparatus and an in-house developed sinker method in three different artificial salivas, one laboratory-made saliva (Buffer saliva) and two commercially available salivas (Salivea and Orthana). <i>Zyn</i> nicotine pouches yielded the fastest nicotine release rate when compared to <i>Velo</i> and <i>Dryft</i> nicotine pouches. Nicotine permeability was assessed using the Side-Bi-Side diffusion cell with the porcine buccal mucosa model. Using neat nicotine solutions, we examined the effects of nicotine concentration (0.05–0.8 mg/mL), pH (5–10) (which covers the nicotine concentration and pH range in the three product extracts), and the three artificial saliva compositions on buccal permeability over 2 h (15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min). While nicotine concentration did not affect the apparent permeability coefficient (<i>P</i><sub>app</sub>) within the tested range, higher pH resulted in a higher <i>P</i><sub>app</sub> value. Moreover, Buffer saliva and Salivea showed higher <i>P</i><sub>app</sub> values than those of Orthana. We further studied nicotine permeability by testing extracts from each nicotine pouch prepared by the sinker dissolution method in biorelevant, mucin containing Orthana saliva. <i>Zyn</i> nicotine pouches provided the highest permeability (38.24 × 10<sup>–6</sup> cm/s), followed by <i>Dryft</i> and <i>Velo</i> nicotine pouches (31.06 × 10<sup>–6</sup> cm/s and 14.84 × 10<sup>–6</sup> cm/s, respectively). Overall, our data indicate that the pH, artificial saliva composition, and product formulation can affect nicotine buccal absorption under laboratory conditions. This research provides a valuable dissolution/permeation tool to measure the nicotine release rate from nicotine pouches and its permeation through the oral mucosa, which can inform product development and adult tobacco consumers’ sensory experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 39","pages":"45644–45655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c06007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Factors Impacting Nicotine Permeation in Oral Nicotine Pouch Products\",\"authors\":\"Xia “Summer” Li,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Akchara Sriram,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Shuzhong “Mark” Zhuang,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Fadi Aldeek*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.5c06007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In recent years, oral nicotine pouches or “tobacco-free nicotine pouches” have emerged as potential reduced-risk alternatives to traditional tobacco products. The aim of this research was to evaluate and further develop laboratory tools to measure the nicotine release rate from nicotine pouches and its permeation through the oral mucosa. For this, we evaluated the nicotine dissolution rate and buccal permeability of three nicotine pouch brands: <i>Zyn</i>, <i>Velo</i>, and <i>Dryft</i> nicotine pouches. Dissolution testing was conducted using the United States Pharmacopeia 4 (USP-4) apparatus and an in-house developed sinker method in three different artificial salivas, one laboratory-made saliva (Buffer saliva) and two commercially available salivas (Salivea and Orthana). <i>Zyn</i> nicotine pouches yielded the fastest nicotine release rate when compared to <i>Velo</i> and <i>Dryft</i> nicotine pouches. Nicotine permeability was assessed using the Side-Bi-Side diffusion cell with the porcine buccal mucosa model. Using neat nicotine solutions, we examined the effects of nicotine concentration (0.05–0.8 mg/mL), pH (5–10) (which covers the nicotine concentration and pH range in the three product extracts), and the three artificial saliva compositions on buccal permeability over 2 h (15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min). While nicotine concentration did not affect the apparent permeability coefficient (<i>P</i><sub>app</sub>) within the tested range, higher pH resulted in a higher <i>P</i><sub>app</sub> value. Moreover, Buffer saliva and Salivea showed higher <i>P</i><sub>app</sub> values than those of Orthana. We further studied nicotine permeability by testing extracts from each nicotine pouch prepared by the sinker dissolution method in biorelevant, mucin containing Orthana saliva. <i>Zyn</i> nicotine pouches provided the highest permeability (38.24 × 10<sup>–6</sup> cm/s), followed by <i>Dryft</i> and <i>Velo</i> nicotine pouches (31.06 × 10<sup>–6</sup> cm/s and 14.84 × 10<sup>–6</sup> cm/s, respectively). Overall, our data indicate that the pH, artificial saliva composition, and product formulation can affect nicotine buccal absorption under laboratory conditions. This research provides a valuable dissolution/permeation tool to measure the nicotine release rate from nicotine pouches and its permeation through the oral mucosa, which can inform product development and adult tobacco consumers’ sensory experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 39\",\"pages\":\"45644–45655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c06007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c06007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c06007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,口服尼古丁袋或“无烟草尼古丁袋”已成为传统烟草产品的潜在低风险替代品。本研究的目的是评估和进一步开发实验室工具来测量尼古丁袋中尼古丁的释放率及其在口腔黏膜中的渗透。为此,我们评估了三种尼古丁袋品牌:Zyn、Velo和Dryft尼古丁袋的尼古丁溶出率和口腔渗透性。使用美国药典4 (USP-4)仪器和内部开发的沉降法对三种不同的人工唾液、一种实验室制造的唾液(Buffer唾液)和两种市售的唾液(Salivea和Orthana)进行溶出测试。与Velo和Dryft尼古丁袋相比,Zyn尼古丁袋的尼古丁释放速度最快。采用侧-双侧扩散细胞法测定猪口腔黏膜烟碱的渗透性。使用纯尼古丁溶液,我们研究了尼古丁浓度(0.05-0.8 mg/mL)、pH(5-10)(包括三种产品提取物中的尼古丁浓度和pH范围)和三种人工唾液成分在2小时(15、30、60、90和120分钟)内对口腔通透性的影响。在测试范围内,尼古丁浓度对表观渗透性系数(Papp)没有影响,pH值越高,Papp值越高。此外,缓冲唾液和唾液的Papp值高于Orthana。我们进一步研究了烟碱的渗透性,测试了用沉降法提取的每个烟碱袋提取物在含有生物相关黏蛋白的狼蛛唾液中的渗透性。Zyn烟碱袋的渗透率最高(38.24 × 10-6 cm/s),其次是Dryft和Velo烟碱袋(分别为31.06 × 10-6 cm/s和14.84 × 10-6 cm/s)。总的来说,我们的数据表明,在实验室条件下,pH值、人工唾液成分和产品配方会影响尼古丁的口腔吸收。本研究提供了一种有价值的溶出/渗透工具,用于测量尼古丁袋中尼古丁的释放速率及其在口腔黏膜中的渗透,为产品开发和成人烟草消费者的感官体验提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Factors Impacting Nicotine Permeation in Oral Nicotine Pouch Products

In recent years, oral nicotine pouches or “tobacco-free nicotine pouches” have emerged as potential reduced-risk alternatives to traditional tobacco products. The aim of this research was to evaluate and further develop laboratory tools to measure the nicotine release rate from nicotine pouches and its permeation through the oral mucosa. For this, we evaluated the nicotine dissolution rate and buccal permeability of three nicotine pouch brands: Zyn, Velo, and Dryft nicotine pouches. Dissolution testing was conducted using the United States Pharmacopeia 4 (USP-4) apparatus and an in-house developed sinker method in three different artificial salivas, one laboratory-made saliva (Buffer saliva) and two commercially available salivas (Salivea and Orthana). Zyn nicotine pouches yielded the fastest nicotine release rate when compared to Velo and Dryft nicotine pouches. Nicotine permeability was assessed using the Side-Bi-Side diffusion cell with the porcine buccal mucosa model. Using neat nicotine solutions, we examined the effects of nicotine concentration (0.05–0.8 mg/mL), pH (5–10) (which covers the nicotine concentration and pH range in the three product extracts), and the three artificial saliva compositions on buccal permeability over 2 h (15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min). While nicotine concentration did not affect the apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) within the tested range, higher pH resulted in a higher Papp value. Moreover, Buffer saliva and Salivea showed higher Papp values than those of Orthana. We further studied nicotine permeability by testing extracts from each nicotine pouch prepared by the sinker dissolution method in biorelevant, mucin containing Orthana saliva. Zyn nicotine pouches provided the highest permeability (38.24 × 10–6 cm/s), followed by Dryft and Velo nicotine pouches (31.06 × 10–6 cm/s and 14.84 × 10–6 cm/s, respectively). Overall, our data indicate that the pH, artificial saliva composition, and product formulation can affect nicotine buccal absorption under laboratory conditions. This research provides a valuable dissolution/permeation tool to measure the nicotine release rate from nicotine pouches and its permeation through the oral mucosa, which can inform product development and adult tobacco consumers’ sensory experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信