热解和燃烧过程中的生物碳排放及风险评估

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.5c05555
Bénit Bouesso, , , Ronan Pelé, , , María González Martínez, , , Morgane Poser, , and , Ange Nzihou*, 
{"title":"热解和燃烧过程中的生物碳排放及风险评估","authors":"Bénit Bouesso,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ronan Pelé,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;María González Martínez,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Morgane Poser,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Ange Nzihou*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.5c05555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Decarbonization of society requires industry to urgently reduce carbon-based and toxic gas emissions, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), to mitigate their environmental impact and associated health risks. Biocarbon (Biochar), due to its properties closer to those of coal and the biogenic nature of its emissions, is a renewable alternative to replace fossil fuels in industrial processes. In this context, the objective of this work is to determine gaseous emissions fate and toxicity in pyrolysis and combustion for biocarbon from solid refuse fuels (SRF, named BC1) and 2 biocarbons from wood with different H/C ratios and volatile matter (VM) content (WBC1, WBC2). The obtained results were correlated to resource characteristics and compared with standard values reported for fossil fuels. Emission factors (EF, g<sub>gas</sub>/g<sub>fuel</sub>) were calculated for the main permanent gases (CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>), as well as for PAH. Biocarbons EF were directly related to their physicochemical characteristics, namely their VM content and, to a lesser extent, their inorganic composition, catalyzing or inhibiting thermochemical conversion reactions. High VM content biocarbon (WBC1, 18.5 wt%) was associated with higher EF values (i.e., 3696 g<sub>CO2</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>). However, EF(CH<sub>4</sub>+H<sub>2</sub>) values at pilot scale met EN ISO 562 standard (&lt;4 wt%) both in pyrolysis (2.8 wt% yield for WBC1) and combustion (0.07 and 0.3 wt% for WBC2 and BC1, respectively). Although PAH released by high VM content biocarbon (WBC1) were less toxic due to their lower number of aromatic rings (&lt;3), they presented a higher EF (46.3 mg<sub>PAH</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>) than that reported for fossil fuels (0.002–64.0 mg<sub>PAH</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>). As a result, the toxicity equivalent factor (TEQ), associated with the carcinogenic potential of a PAH and its yield, was higher for biocarbon (WBC1, 0.132) compared with fossil fuels (0.005–0.03). Most importantly, reduce condensable species production, and, consequently, lower EF values for permanent gases were measured (2000–2980 g<sub>CO2</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>) in combustion, and no PAH was detected, resulting in a lower TEQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 39","pages":"45533–45542"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c05555","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biocarbon Emissions and Risks Assessment in Pyrolysis and Combustion\",\"authors\":\"Bénit Bouesso,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Ronan Pelé,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;María González Martínez,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Morgane Poser,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Ange Nzihou*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.5c05555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Decarbonization of society requires industry to urgently reduce carbon-based and toxic gas emissions, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), to mitigate their environmental impact and associated health risks. Biocarbon (Biochar), due to its properties closer to those of coal and the biogenic nature of its emissions, is a renewable alternative to replace fossil fuels in industrial processes. In this context, the objective of this work is to determine gaseous emissions fate and toxicity in pyrolysis and combustion for biocarbon from solid refuse fuels (SRF, named BC1) and 2 biocarbons from wood with different H/C ratios and volatile matter (VM) content (WBC1, WBC2). The obtained results were correlated to resource characteristics and compared with standard values reported for fossil fuels. Emission factors (EF, g<sub>gas</sub>/g<sub>fuel</sub>) were calculated for the main permanent gases (CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>), as well as for PAH. Biocarbons EF were directly related to their physicochemical characteristics, namely their VM content and, to a lesser extent, their inorganic composition, catalyzing or inhibiting thermochemical conversion reactions. High VM content biocarbon (WBC1, 18.5 wt%) was associated with higher EF values (i.e., 3696 g<sub>CO2</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>). However, EF(CH<sub>4</sub>+H<sub>2</sub>) values at pilot scale met EN ISO 562 standard (&lt;4 wt%) both in pyrolysis (2.8 wt% yield for WBC1) and combustion (0.07 and 0.3 wt% for WBC2 and BC1, respectively). Although PAH released by high VM content biocarbon (WBC1) were less toxic due to their lower number of aromatic rings (&lt;3), they presented a higher EF (46.3 mg<sub>PAH</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>) than that reported for fossil fuels (0.002–64.0 mg<sub>PAH</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>). As a result, the toxicity equivalent factor (TEQ), associated with the carcinogenic potential of a PAH and its yield, was higher for biocarbon (WBC1, 0.132) compared with fossil fuels (0.005–0.03). Most importantly, reduce condensable species production, and, consequently, lower EF values for permanent gases were measured (2000–2980 g<sub>CO2</sub>/kg<sub>fuel</sub>) in combustion, and no PAH was detected, resulting in a lower TEQ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 39\",\"pages\":\"45533–45542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c05555\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c05555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c05555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会的脱碳要求工业紧急减少碳基气体和有毒气体的排放,如多环芳烃(PAH),以减轻其环境影响和相关的健康风险。生物炭(Biochar),由于其特性更接近煤炭,其排放的生物性质,是工业过程中替代化石燃料的可再生替代品。在此背景下,本研究的目的是确定固体垃圾燃料(SRF,命名为BC1)和木材中2种具有不同H/C比和挥发性物质(VM)含量(WBC1, WBC2)的生物碳在热解和燃烧过程中的气体排放命运和毒性。所得结果与资源特征相关,并与化石燃料报告的标准值进行了比较。计算了主要永久性气体(CO、CO2、H2、CH4)和多环芳烃(PAH)的排放因子(EF、ggas/gfuel)。生物碳EF与其物理化学特性直接相关,即其VM含量,并在较小程度上与其无机组成,催化或抑制热化学转化反应有关。高VM含量的生物碳(WBC1, 18.5 wt%)与较高的EF值(即3696 gCO2/kg燃料)相关。然而,在中试规模下,EF(CH4+H2)值在热解(WBC1产率为2.8 wt%)和燃烧(WBC2和BC1分别为0.07和0.3 wt%)中均符合EN ISO 562标准(<4 wt%)。虽然高VM含量生物碳(WBC1)释放的多环芳烃由于其芳香环数量较少(<3)而毒性较小,但其EF (46.3 mgPAH/kgfuel)高于化石燃料(0.002-64.0 mgPAH/kgfuel)。因此,与多环芳烃的致癌潜力及其产量相关的毒性当量因子(TEQ)在生物碳中(WBC1, 0.132)高于化石燃料(0.005-0.03)。最重要的是,减少了可冷凝物质的产生,从而降低了燃烧中永久性气体的EF值(2000-2980 gCO2/kg燃料),并且没有检测到多环芳烃,从而降低了TEQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biocarbon Emissions and Risks Assessment in Pyrolysis and Combustion

Decarbonization of society requires industry to urgently reduce carbon-based and toxic gas emissions, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), to mitigate their environmental impact and associated health risks. Biocarbon (Biochar), due to its properties closer to those of coal and the biogenic nature of its emissions, is a renewable alternative to replace fossil fuels in industrial processes. In this context, the objective of this work is to determine gaseous emissions fate and toxicity in pyrolysis and combustion for biocarbon from solid refuse fuels (SRF, named BC1) and 2 biocarbons from wood with different H/C ratios and volatile matter (VM) content (WBC1, WBC2). The obtained results were correlated to resource characteristics and compared with standard values reported for fossil fuels. Emission factors (EF, ggas/gfuel) were calculated for the main permanent gases (CO, CO2, H2, CH4), as well as for PAH. Biocarbons EF were directly related to their physicochemical characteristics, namely their VM content and, to a lesser extent, their inorganic composition, catalyzing or inhibiting thermochemical conversion reactions. High VM content biocarbon (WBC1, 18.5 wt%) was associated with higher EF values (i.e., 3696 gCO2/kgfuel). However, EF(CH4+H2) values at pilot scale met EN ISO 562 standard (<4 wt%) both in pyrolysis (2.8 wt% yield for WBC1) and combustion (0.07 and 0.3 wt% for WBC2 and BC1, respectively). Although PAH released by high VM content biocarbon (WBC1) were less toxic due to their lower number of aromatic rings (<3), they presented a higher EF (46.3 mgPAH/kgfuel) than that reported for fossil fuels (0.002–64.0 mgPAH/kgfuel). As a result, the toxicity equivalent factor (TEQ), associated with the carcinogenic potential of a PAH and its yield, was higher for biocarbon (WBC1, 0.132) compared with fossil fuels (0.005–0.03). Most importantly, reduce condensable species production, and, consequently, lower EF values for permanent gases were measured (2000–2980 gCO2/kgfuel) in combustion, and no PAH was detected, resulting in a lower TEQ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信