老年心力衰竭患者骨骼肌减少症全球领导倡议模型的预后效用:脆弱性-心力衰竭研究的事后分析

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Taisuke Nakade, Daichi Maeda, Yuya Matsue, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Yudai Fujimoto, Tsutomu Sunayama, Taishi Dotare, Kentaro Jujo, Kazuya Saito, Kentaro Kamiya, Hiroshi Saito, Yuki Ogasahara, Emi Maekawa, Masaaki Konishi, Takeshi Kitai, Kentaro Iwata, Hiroshi Wada, Takatoshi Kasai, Hirofumi Nagamatsu, Shin-Ichi Momomura, Tohru Minamino
{"title":"老年心力衰竭患者骨骼肌减少症全球领导倡议模型的预后效用:脆弱性-心力衰竭研究的事后分析","authors":"Taisuke Nakade, Daichi Maeda, Yuya Matsue, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Yudai Fujimoto, Tsutomu Sunayama, Taishi Dotare, Kentaro Jujo, Kazuya Saito, Kentaro Kamiya, Hiroshi Saito, Yuki Ogasahara, Emi Maekawa, Masaaki Konishi, Takeshi Kitai, Kentaro Iwata, Hiroshi Wada, Takatoshi Kasai, Hirofumi Nagamatsu, Shin-Ichi Momomura, Tohru Minamino","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Global Leadership Initiative on Sarcopenia (GLIS) defines sarcopenia based on muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle-specific strength, considering physical performance as an outcome rather than a diagnostic criterion. This study aimed to evaluate whether the GLIS model can effectively assess the prognostic value and impaired physical performance in older patients with heart failure. A post-hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study, was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis included 891 patients (median age: 81 [interquartile range: 74-86] years; 41.9% women) hospitalized for heart failure. Sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were assessed using the GLIS model. The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was impaired physical performance, including 6-minute walk distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the GLIS model, sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were observed in 186 (20.9%) and 539 (60.5%) patients, respectively. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly increased 2-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-6.56, P < 0.001). Sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were significantly associated with impaired physical performance. The diagnosis of sarcopenia based on the GLIS model provided superior prognostic discrimination compared to the diagnosis based on the conventional Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 model (net reclassification improvement 0.269, 95% CI 0.141-0.397, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis of sarcopenia based on the GLIS model was associated with prognosis and impaired physical performance in older patients with heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic utility of the Global Leadership Initiative on Sarcopenia model in older patients with heart failure: post-hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study.\",\"authors\":\"Taisuke Nakade, Daichi Maeda, Yuya Matsue, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Yudai Fujimoto, Tsutomu Sunayama, Taishi Dotare, Kentaro Jujo, Kazuya Saito, Kentaro Kamiya, Hiroshi Saito, Yuki Ogasahara, Emi Maekawa, Masaaki Konishi, Takeshi Kitai, Kentaro Iwata, Hiroshi Wada, Takatoshi Kasai, Hirofumi Nagamatsu, Shin-Ichi Momomura, Tohru Minamino\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Global Leadership Initiative on Sarcopenia (GLIS) defines sarcopenia based on muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle-specific strength, considering physical performance as an outcome rather than a diagnostic criterion. This study aimed to evaluate whether the GLIS model can effectively assess the prognostic value and impaired physical performance in older patients with heart failure. A post-hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study, was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis included 891 patients (median age: 81 [interquartile range: 74-86] years; 41.9% women) hospitalized for heart failure. Sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were assessed using the GLIS model. The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was impaired physical performance, including 6-minute walk distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the GLIS model, sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were observed in 186 (20.9%) and 539 (60.5%) patients, respectively. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly increased 2-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-6.56, P < 0.001). Sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were significantly associated with impaired physical performance. The diagnosis of sarcopenia based on the GLIS model provided superior prognostic discrimination compared to the diagnosis based on the conventional Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 model (net reclassification improvement 0.269, 95% CI 0.141-0.397, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis of sarcopenia based on the GLIS model was associated with prognosis and impaired physical performance in older patients with heart failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肌少症全球领导倡议(GLIS)根据肌肉质量、肌肉力量和肌肉特定力量来定义肌少症,将身体表现作为结果而不是诊断标准。本研究旨在评估GLIS模型是否能有效评估老年心力衰竭患者的预后价值和身体机能受损情况。对FRAGILE-HF研究进行了事后分析,这是一项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。方法:分析891例因心力衰竭住院的患者(中位年龄:81岁[四分位间距:74-86岁],其中41.9%为女性)。使用GLIS模型评估肌肉减少症和可能的肌肉减少症。主要终点是2年全因死亡率,次要终点是身体机能受损,包括6分钟步行距离。结果:根据GLIS模型,分别有186例(20.9%)和539例(60.5%)患者出现肌肉减少和可能出现肌肉减少。肌肉减少症与2年死亡率显著增加相关(校正风险比3.38,95%可信区间[CI] 1.74-6.56, P < 0.001)。肌肉减少症和可能的肌肉减少症与身体机能受损显著相关。与基于传统亚洲肌少症工作组2019模型的诊断相比,基于GLIS模型的肌少症诊断提供了更好的预后判别(净再分类改善0.269,95% CI 0.141-0.397, P < 0.001)。结论:基于GLIS模型的老年心力衰竭患者肌少症诊断与预后及运动能力受损有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic utility of the Global Leadership Initiative on Sarcopenia model in older patients with heart failure: post-hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study.

Aims: The Global Leadership Initiative on Sarcopenia (GLIS) defines sarcopenia based on muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle-specific strength, considering physical performance as an outcome rather than a diagnostic criterion. This study aimed to evaluate whether the GLIS model can effectively assess the prognostic value and impaired physical performance in older patients with heart failure. A post-hoc analysis of the FRAGILE-HF study, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study, was conducted.

Methods: The analysis included 891 patients (median age: 81 [interquartile range: 74-86] years; 41.9% women) hospitalized for heart failure. Sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were assessed using the GLIS model. The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was impaired physical performance, including 6-minute walk distance.

Results: According to the GLIS model, sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were observed in 186 (20.9%) and 539 (60.5%) patients, respectively. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly increased 2-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-6.56, P < 0.001). Sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia were significantly associated with impaired physical performance. The diagnosis of sarcopenia based on the GLIS model provided superior prognostic discrimination compared to the diagnosis based on the conventional Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 model (net reclassification improvement 0.269, 95% CI 0.141-0.397, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The diagnosis of sarcopenia based on the GLIS model was associated with prognosis and impaired physical performance in older patients with heart failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信