通过人工智能整合加强文献综述:以认知效率为例。

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Brian A Polin, Livia Levine
{"title":"通过人工智能整合加强文献综述:以认知效率为例。","authors":"Brian A Polin, Livia Levine","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"cognitive efficiency\" (CE) lacks a unified definition and consistent measurement across diverse academic disciplines, hindering interdisciplinary research. Concurrently, while artificial intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly evolving, systematic methodologies for their application in literature reviews remain nascent. This paper addresses these two critical gaps. First, through an AI-assisted systematic review of 96 scholarly articles, we propose a consolidated definition of CE as \"a measure of an individual's memory recall and ability to process information within a given reaction time,\" providing much-needed clarity. Second, we present a novel, iterative methodology for conducting systematic reviews that strategically integrates the strengths of currently accessible AI tools with essential human judgment and expertise. Our findings highlight AI's proficiency in individual article comprehension and theme identification, while also demonstrating its current limitations in complex data synthesis and inter-paper comparison. This research offers both a clearer conceptualization of cognitive efficiency and a robust, reproducible framework for leveraging AI to enhance the efficiency and rigor of future systematic literature reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"260 ","pages":"105626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing literature reviews through AI integration: A case study on cognitive efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Brian A Polin, Livia Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The term \\\"cognitive efficiency\\\" (CE) lacks a unified definition and consistent measurement across diverse academic disciplines, hindering interdisciplinary research. Concurrently, while artificial intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly evolving, systematic methodologies for their application in literature reviews remain nascent. This paper addresses these two critical gaps. First, through an AI-assisted systematic review of 96 scholarly articles, we propose a consolidated definition of CE as \\\"a measure of an individual's memory recall and ability to process information within a given reaction time,\\\" providing much-needed clarity. Second, we present a novel, iterative methodology for conducting systematic reviews that strategically integrates the strengths of currently accessible AI tools with essential human judgment and expertise. Our findings highlight AI's proficiency in individual article comprehension and theme identification, while also demonstrating its current limitations in complex data synthesis and inter-paper comparison. This research offers both a clearer conceptualization of cognitive efficiency and a robust, reproducible framework for leveraging AI to enhance the efficiency and rigor of future systematic literature reviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"260 \",\"pages\":\"105626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105626\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105626","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知效率(cognitive efficiency, CE)一词在不同学科间缺乏统一的定义和一致的衡量标准,阻碍了跨学科的研究。同时,虽然人工智能(AI)工具正在迅速发展,但在文献综述中应用它们的系统方法仍处于萌芽阶段。本文解决了这两个关键的差距。首先,通过对96篇学术文章的人工智能辅助系统综述,我们提出了一个统一的CE定义,即“衡量个人记忆回忆和在给定反应时间内处理信息的能力”,提供了急需的清晰度。其次,我们提出了一种新颖的迭代方法,用于进行系统审查,战略性地将当前可访问的人工智能工具的优势与基本的人类判断和专业知识相结合。我们的研究结果突出了人工智能在单篇文章理解和主题识别方面的熟练程度,同时也表明了它目前在复杂数据合成和论文间比较方面的局限性。本研究为认知效率提供了一个更清晰的概念,并为利用人工智能提高未来系统文献综述的效率和严谨性提供了一个强大的、可重复的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing literature reviews through AI integration: A case study on cognitive efficiency.

The term "cognitive efficiency" (CE) lacks a unified definition and consistent measurement across diverse academic disciplines, hindering interdisciplinary research. Concurrently, while artificial intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly evolving, systematic methodologies for their application in literature reviews remain nascent. This paper addresses these two critical gaps. First, through an AI-assisted systematic review of 96 scholarly articles, we propose a consolidated definition of CE as "a measure of an individual's memory recall and ability to process information within a given reaction time," providing much-needed clarity. Second, we present a novel, iterative methodology for conducting systematic reviews that strategically integrates the strengths of currently accessible AI tools with essential human judgment and expertise. Our findings highlight AI's proficiency in individual article comprehension and theme identification, while also demonstrating its current limitations in complex data synthesis and inter-paper comparison. This research offers both a clearer conceptualization of cognitive efficiency and a robust, reproducible framework for leveraging AI to enhance the efficiency and rigor of future systematic literature reviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信