Jiancheng Xi, Seth Acquah Boateng, Gabriel Mordzifa Sackitey, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Michael Provide Fumey
{"title":"可再生能源转型的政治经济学:G7经济体对地缘政治风险和政治稳定的技术具体反应。","authors":"Jiancheng Xi, Seth Acquah Boateng, Gabriel Mordzifa Sackitey, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Michael Provide Fumey","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global transition to renewable energy faces increasing challenges from geopolitical uncertainties, political instabilities, and varying innovation capabilities across different technologies and countries. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of geopolitical risk, political stability, and the moderating role of technological innovation on renewable energy deployment. The study examined solar PV, onshore wind, and hydropower technologies in G-7 countries from 2000 to 2024. The study adopted Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Panel FMOLS estimation techniques. The analysis reveals significant technology-specific vulnerabilities to external factors. Geopolitical risk substantially reduces solar PV deployment by 1.99 % and hydropower by 1.98 % per unit increase, while wind energy demonstrates resilience. Political stability proves critical only for hydropower development, requiring extensive institutional coordination. Technological innovation emerges as both a direct catalyst for solar expansion and a crucial moderating factor mitigating geopolitical risks for hydropower. These findings challenge assumptions of uniform renewable energy responses and underscore the necessity for technology-specific policy approaches rather than generalized strategies in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127453"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political economy of renewable energy transitions: Technology-specific responses to geopolitical risk and political stability in G7 economies.\",\"authors\":\"Jiancheng Xi, Seth Acquah Boateng, Gabriel Mordzifa Sackitey, Frank Agyemang Karikari, Michael Provide Fumey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global transition to renewable energy faces increasing challenges from geopolitical uncertainties, political instabilities, and varying innovation capabilities across different technologies and countries. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of geopolitical risk, political stability, and the moderating role of technological innovation on renewable energy deployment. The study examined solar PV, onshore wind, and hydropower technologies in G-7 countries from 2000 to 2024. The study adopted Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Panel FMOLS estimation techniques. The analysis reveals significant technology-specific vulnerabilities to external factors. Geopolitical risk substantially reduces solar PV deployment by 1.99 % and hydropower by 1.98 % per unit increase, while wind energy demonstrates resilience. Political stability proves critical only for hydropower development, requiring extensive institutional coordination. Technological innovation emerges as both a direct catalyst for solar expansion and a crucial moderating factor mitigating geopolitical risks for hydropower. These findings challenge assumptions of uniform renewable energy responses and underscore the necessity for technology-specific policy approaches rather than generalized strategies in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"127453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127453\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Political economy of renewable energy transitions: Technology-specific responses to geopolitical risk and political stability in G7 economies.
The global transition to renewable energy faces increasing challenges from geopolitical uncertainties, political instabilities, and varying innovation capabilities across different technologies and countries. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of geopolitical risk, political stability, and the moderating role of technological innovation on renewable energy deployment. The study examined solar PV, onshore wind, and hydropower technologies in G-7 countries from 2000 to 2024. The study adopted Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and Panel FMOLS estimation techniques. The analysis reveals significant technology-specific vulnerabilities to external factors. Geopolitical risk substantially reduces solar PV deployment by 1.99 % and hydropower by 1.98 % per unit increase, while wind energy demonstrates resilience. Political stability proves critical only for hydropower development, requiring extensive institutional coordination. Technological innovation emerges as both a direct catalyst for solar expansion and a crucial moderating factor mitigating geopolitical risks for hydropower. These findings challenge assumptions of uniform renewable energy responses and underscore the necessity for technology-specific policy approaches rather than generalized strategies in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.