参与还是不参与?老年人的社会活动与生存信念

IF 1.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Kyklos Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1111/kykl.12475
Huaxin Wang-Lu
{"title":"参与还是不参与?老年人的社会活动与生存信念","authors":"Huaxin Wang-Lu","doi":"10.1111/kykl.12475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>While survival belief is central to major life decisions, its social determinants remain understudied. Social engagement is proven to influence various health outcomes, yet the direction of these relationships stays controversial, with quasi-experimental designs being laid aside. It is also unexplored what happens once individuals withdraw from established social life. To address these gaps, this paper leverages the potential randomness in the timing of individual (dis)engagement behavior to examine the causal effects of social (dis)engagement on the subjective probability of unsuccessful survival (SPUS) of young-old Chinese, using a panel of 11,412 respondents from the 2011–2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A dynamic difference-in-differences approach, with various constructs of treatment and control groups, was employed to validate the estimation. Several robustness checks, including factor analysis and propensity score matching, were further conducted. The primary findings are that social engagement reduces older people's SPUS by up to 2.80 percentage points immediately and by 6.67 percentage points one period later. Conversely, social disengagement shows no immediate effects, but its post-treatment impact can reach up to 14.76 percentage points among subgroups. Interestingly, the engagement effects persist only among non-switchers, fading once switching begins, and the disengagement effects also emerge only among non-switchers. In sum, this study provides partial evidence of stronger disengagement effects, though these effects occur neither instantly nor universally.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47739,"journal":{"name":"Kyklos","volume":"78 4","pages":"1387-1404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Engage or Not to Engage? Social Activities and Survival Beliefs in Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Huaxin Wang-Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/kykl.12475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>While survival belief is central to major life decisions, its social determinants remain understudied. Social engagement is proven to influence various health outcomes, yet the direction of these relationships stays controversial, with quasi-experimental designs being laid aside. It is also unexplored what happens once individuals withdraw from established social life. To address these gaps, this paper leverages the potential randomness in the timing of individual (dis)engagement behavior to examine the causal effects of social (dis)engagement on the subjective probability of unsuccessful survival (SPUS) of young-old Chinese, using a panel of 11,412 respondents from the 2011–2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A dynamic difference-in-differences approach, with various constructs of treatment and control groups, was employed to validate the estimation. Several robustness checks, including factor analysis and propensity score matching, were further conducted. The primary findings are that social engagement reduces older people's SPUS by up to 2.80 percentage points immediately and by 6.67 percentage points one period later. Conversely, social disengagement shows no immediate effects, but its post-treatment impact can reach up to 14.76 percentage points among subgroups. Interestingly, the engagement effects persist only among non-switchers, fading once switching begins, and the disengagement effects also emerge only among non-switchers. In sum, this study provides partial evidence of stronger disengagement effects, though these effects occur neither instantly nor universally.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kyklos\",\"volume\":\"78 4\",\"pages\":\"1387-1404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kyklos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.12475\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyklos","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.12475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然生存信念是重大人生决策的核心,但其社会决定因素仍未得到充分研究。社会参与被证明会影响各种健康结果,但这些关系的方向仍然存在争议,准实验设计被搁置一边。当个人退出既定的社会生活后会发生什么,这也是未知的。为了解决这些差距,本文利用个体(脱离)参与行为时间的潜在随机性,利用2011-2020年中国健康与退休纵向研究的11,412名受访者,研究了社会(脱离)参与对中国年轻老年人不成功生存主观概率(SPUS)的因果影响。采用动态差异中的差异方法,采用不同结构的实验组和对照组,来验证估计。进一步进行因子分析和倾向评分匹配等稳健性检验。研究的主要发现是,社交活动可使老年人的SPUS立即降低2.80个百分点,一段时间后降低6.67个百分点。相反,社交脱离没有立即的影响,但其治疗后的影响在亚组中可以达到14.76个百分点。有趣的是,投入效应只在非转换者中存在,一旦转换开始就会消失,而脱离效应也只在非转换者中出现。总之,这项研究提供了更强的脱离效应的部分证据,尽管这些效应既不是立即发生的,也不是普遍发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

To Engage or Not to Engage? Social Activities and Survival Beliefs in Older Adults

To Engage or Not to Engage? Social Activities and Survival Beliefs in Older Adults

While survival belief is central to major life decisions, its social determinants remain understudied. Social engagement is proven to influence various health outcomes, yet the direction of these relationships stays controversial, with quasi-experimental designs being laid aside. It is also unexplored what happens once individuals withdraw from established social life. To address these gaps, this paper leverages the potential randomness in the timing of individual (dis)engagement behavior to examine the causal effects of social (dis)engagement on the subjective probability of unsuccessful survival (SPUS) of young-old Chinese, using a panel of 11,412 respondents from the 2011–2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A dynamic difference-in-differences approach, with various constructs of treatment and control groups, was employed to validate the estimation. Several robustness checks, including factor analysis and propensity score matching, were further conducted. The primary findings are that social engagement reduces older people's SPUS by up to 2.80 percentage points immediately and by 6.67 percentage points one period later. Conversely, social disengagement shows no immediate effects, but its post-treatment impact can reach up to 14.76 percentage points among subgroups. Interestingly, the engagement effects persist only among non-switchers, fading once switching begins, and the disengagement effects also emerge only among non-switchers. In sum, this study provides partial evidence of stronger disengagement effects, though these effects occur neither instantly nor universally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kyklos
Kyklos ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: KYKLOS views economics as a social science and as such favours contributions dealing with issues relevant to contemporary society, as well as economic policy applications. Since its inception nearly 60 years ago, KYKLOS has earned a worldwide reputation for publishing a broad range of articles from international scholars on real world issues. KYKLOS encourages unorthodox, original approaches to topical economic and social issues with a multinational application, and promises to give fresh insights into topics of worldwide interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信