河流温度对河岸缓冲配置的响应:俄勒冈州海岸范围的重复实验

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Alex W. Foote, Ashley M. Sanders, Ashley A. Coble, Dana R. Warren
{"title":"河流温度对河岸缓冲配置的响应:俄勒冈州海岸范围的重复实验","authors":"Alex W. Foote,&nbsp;Ashley M. Sanders,&nbsp;Ashley A. Coble,&nbsp;Dana R. Warren","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Riparian buffers provide many important functions for streams, including shade to limit water temperature increases after forest harvest. Conventional buffer designs often designate a minimum width, but alternative configurations such as hydrologically adaptive variable retention or canopy gaps buffers may enhance stream productivity by introducing heterogeneity in stream light whilst still providing thermal buffering, shade, and large wood recruitment. Therefore, alternative buffer designs may be an important climate adaptation strategy. To better understand stream temperature responses to conventional and novel alternative riparian buffer configurations, we conducted a large-scale before-after control-impact experiment across 28 streams in western Oregon. We established six replicate stream blocks that each included five streams: an uncut reference stream and four streams with different riparian buffer designs (Fixed-Width, Standard Practise, Variable Retention, and Canopy Gaps). Prior to treatment, all streams were well shaded (mean effective shade = 96.2%), post-treatment percent shade was reduced by up to 31.4 percentage points. Mixed effect model estimates indicated a 7 day moving average of daily maxima temperatures (T7Max) increased post-treatment by 0.89°C, 0.94°C, 0.79°C, and 0.42°C in Fixed-Width, Standard Practise, Variable Retention, and Canopy Gaps treatments, respectively, but did not differ amongst treatments. Stream temperature response was explained by both percent reduction in effective shade and bankfull width, indicating stream temperature was more sensitive to reductions in shade in smaller streams. We found Variable Retention and Fixed-Width buffers, but not buffers with Canopy Gaps, increased longitudinal temperature variability. Our findings suggest that novel alternative buffers were as protective of temperature as conventional buffers whilst allowing flexibility in application. Therefore, these hydrologically adaptive Variable Retention or Canopy Gaps alternatives may be viable tools to both limit temperature increases and enhance variation in light conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stream Temperature Response to Riparian Buffer Configurations: A Replicated Experiment Across Oregon's Coast Range\",\"authors\":\"Alex W. Foote,&nbsp;Ashley M. Sanders,&nbsp;Ashley A. Coble,&nbsp;Dana R. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Riparian buffers provide many important functions for streams, including shade to limit water temperature increases after forest harvest. Conventional buffer designs often designate a minimum width, but alternative configurations such as hydrologically adaptive variable retention or canopy gaps buffers may enhance stream productivity by introducing heterogeneity in stream light whilst still providing thermal buffering, shade, and large wood recruitment. Therefore, alternative buffer designs may be an important climate adaptation strategy. To better understand stream temperature responses to conventional and novel alternative riparian buffer configurations, we conducted a large-scale before-after control-impact experiment across 28 streams in western Oregon. We established six replicate stream blocks that each included five streams: an uncut reference stream and four streams with different riparian buffer designs (Fixed-Width, Standard Practise, Variable Retention, and Canopy Gaps). Prior to treatment, all streams were well shaded (mean effective shade = 96.2%), post-treatment percent shade was reduced by up to 31.4 percentage points. Mixed effect model estimates indicated a 7 day moving average of daily maxima temperatures (T7Max) increased post-treatment by 0.89°C, 0.94°C, 0.79°C, and 0.42°C in Fixed-Width, Standard Practise, Variable Retention, and Canopy Gaps treatments, respectively, but did not differ amongst treatments. Stream temperature response was explained by both percent reduction in effective shade and bankfull width, indicating stream temperature was more sensitive to reductions in shade in smaller streams. We found Variable Retention and Fixed-Width buffers, but not buffers with Canopy Gaps, increased longitudinal temperature variability. Our findings suggest that novel alternative buffers were as protective of temperature as conventional buffers whilst allowing flexibility in application. Therefore, these hydrologically adaptive Variable Retention or Canopy Gaps alternatives may be viable tools to both limit temperature increases and enhance variation in light conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70278\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70278\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

河岸缓冲带为溪流提供了许多重要的功能,包括遮荫以限制森林采伐后水温的升高。传统的缓冲设计通常指定最小宽度,但其他配置,如水文适应性可变保留或树冠间隙缓冲,可以通过引入流光的异质性来提高流的生产力,同时仍然提供热缓冲、遮荫和大量木材补充。因此,备选缓冲区设计可能是一种重要的气候适应策略。为了更好地了解河流温度对传统和新型替代河岸缓冲配置的响应,我们在俄勒冈州西部的28条河流中进行了大规模的前后控制冲击实验。我们建立了六个重复的河流区块,每个区块包括五条河流:一条未切割的参考河流和四条具有不同河岸缓冲设计的河流(固定宽度、标准实践、可变保留和树冠间隙)。治疗前,所有溪流都有良好的树荫(平均有效树荫= 96.2%),治疗后树荫百分比减少了31.4个百分点。混合效应模型估计表明,固定宽度处理、标准实践处理、可变保留处理和冠层间隙处理的7天移动平均日最高温度(T7Max)分别增加了0.89°C、0.94°C、0.79°C和0.42°C,但处理之间没有差异。河流温度响应可以用有效遮荫百分比减少和河岸宽度减少来解释,这表明在较小的河流中,河流温度对遮荫减少更为敏感。我们发现可变保留率和固定宽度缓冲区增加了纵向温度变化,但没有树冠间隙的缓冲区。我们的研究结果表明,新型替代缓冲液与传统缓冲液一样具有温度保护作用,同时允许应用的灵活性。因此,这些具有水文适应性的可变保留或冠层间隙替代方案可能是限制温度升高和增强光照条件变化的可行工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stream Temperature Response to Riparian Buffer Configurations: A Replicated Experiment Across Oregon's Coast Range

Stream Temperature Response to Riparian Buffer Configurations: A Replicated Experiment Across Oregon's Coast Range

Riparian buffers provide many important functions for streams, including shade to limit water temperature increases after forest harvest. Conventional buffer designs often designate a minimum width, but alternative configurations such as hydrologically adaptive variable retention or canopy gaps buffers may enhance stream productivity by introducing heterogeneity in stream light whilst still providing thermal buffering, shade, and large wood recruitment. Therefore, alternative buffer designs may be an important climate adaptation strategy. To better understand stream temperature responses to conventional and novel alternative riparian buffer configurations, we conducted a large-scale before-after control-impact experiment across 28 streams in western Oregon. We established six replicate stream blocks that each included five streams: an uncut reference stream and four streams with different riparian buffer designs (Fixed-Width, Standard Practise, Variable Retention, and Canopy Gaps). Prior to treatment, all streams were well shaded (mean effective shade = 96.2%), post-treatment percent shade was reduced by up to 31.4 percentage points. Mixed effect model estimates indicated a 7 day moving average of daily maxima temperatures (T7Max) increased post-treatment by 0.89°C, 0.94°C, 0.79°C, and 0.42°C in Fixed-Width, Standard Practise, Variable Retention, and Canopy Gaps treatments, respectively, but did not differ amongst treatments. Stream temperature response was explained by both percent reduction in effective shade and bankfull width, indicating stream temperature was more sensitive to reductions in shade in smaller streams. We found Variable Retention and Fixed-Width buffers, but not buffers with Canopy Gaps, increased longitudinal temperature variability. Our findings suggest that novel alternative buffers were as protective of temperature as conventional buffers whilst allowing flexibility in application. Therefore, these hydrologically adaptive Variable Retention or Canopy Gaps alternatives may be viable tools to both limit temperature increases and enhance variation in light conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信