瑞士自由贸易协定对农业贸易的影响

IF 1.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Kyklos Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1111/kykl.12472
Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor, Christian Ritzel, Judith Irek, Gabriele Mack
{"title":"瑞士自由贸易协定对农业贸易的影响","authors":"Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor,&nbsp;Christian Ritzel,&nbsp;Judith Irek,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack","doi":"10.1111/kykl.12472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a country highly dependent on imports, Switzerland has many free trade agreements (FTAs) that liberalise trade barriers. We assess how these agreements affect Swiss agricultural imports at different margins of trade adjustment. We estimate reduced-form gravity models using agricultural trade data for 202 partner countries from 2004 to 2022. We find that Swiss FTAs increase agricultural import values by 8.75%, decrease import prices by 3%, increase the probability of imports by 2% and reduce market exit rates by 1%. These effects are heterogeneous across products, sectors and agreements. Regarding import values and quantities, the positive effects of FTAs are mainly observed for raw products (including vegetables, fruits and nuts, coffee, tea and spices). However, the estimated effects are negative for processed products. Regarding import prices, the effects are positive whenever they are statistically significant. We also find that the number of competing agreements to which a Swiss trade partner is exposed only marginally affects Swiss imports. We extend our analysis to agricultural exports and find that FTAs increase Swiss export values by 47%, quantities by 53% and prices by 3% but do not affect export probabilities or export market exit rates. Thus, although Swiss FTAs generally boost trade on average, policymaking should consider the heterogeneities of the estimated FTA effects regarding products, agreements and time when using FTA estimates for counterfactual analysis and negotiations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47739,"journal":{"name":"Kyklos","volume":"78 4","pages":"1333-1357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/kykl.12472","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Swiss Free Trade Agreements on Agricultural Trade\",\"authors\":\"Dela-Dem Doe Fiankor,&nbsp;Christian Ritzel,&nbsp;Judith Irek,&nbsp;Gabriele Mack\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/kykl.12472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As a country highly dependent on imports, Switzerland has many free trade agreements (FTAs) that liberalise trade barriers. We assess how these agreements affect Swiss agricultural imports at different margins of trade adjustment. We estimate reduced-form gravity models using agricultural trade data for 202 partner countries from 2004 to 2022. We find that Swiss FTAs increase agricultural import values by 8.75%, decrease import prices by 3%, increase the probability of imports by 2% and reduce market exit rates by 1%. These effects are heterogeneous across products, sectors and agreements. Regarding import values and quantities, the positive effects of FTAs are mainly observed for raw products (including vegetables, fruits and nuts, coffee, tea and spices). However, the estimated effects are negative for processed products. Regarding import prices, the effects are positive whenever they are statistically significant. We also find that the number of competing agreements to which a Swiss trade partner is exposed only marginally affects Swiss imports. We extend our analysis to agricultural exports and find that FTAs increase Swiss export values by 47%, quantities by 53% and prices by 3% but do not affect export probabilities or export market exit rates. Thus, although Swiss FTAs generally boost trade on average, policymaking should consider the heterogeneities of the estimated FTA effects regarding products, agreements and time when using FTA estimates for counterfactual analysis and negotiations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kyklos\",\"volume\":\"78 4\",\"pages\":\"1333-1357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/kykl.12472\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kyklos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.12472\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyklos","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/kykl.12472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一个高度依赖进口的国家,瑞士有许多自由贸易协定(FTAs)来消除贸易壁垒。我们评估了这些协定在不同贸易调整幅度下对瑞士农产品进口的影响。我们利用2004年至2022年202个伙伴国的农业贸易数据估算了简化形式的重力模型。我们发现,瑞士自贸协定使农产品进口额增加了8.75%,进口价格降低了3%,进口概率增加了2%,市场退出率降低了1%。这些影响因产品、行业和协议而异。就进口价值和数量而言,自由贸易协定的积极影响主要体现在原料产品(包括蔬菜、水果和坚果、咖啡、茶和香料)方面。然而,估计对加工产品的影响是负面的。对于进口价格,只要在统计上显著,其影响就是正的。我们还发现,瑞士贸易伙伴所面临的竞争协议的数量对瑞士进口的影响微乎其微。我们将分析扩展到农产品出口,发现自由贸易协定使瑞士的出口价值增加47%,数量增加53%,价格增加3%,但不影响出口概率或出口市场退出率。因此,尽管瑞士的自由贸易协定平均而言促进了贸易,但政策制定在使用自由贸易协定估计进行反事实分析和谈判时,应考虑到估计的自由贸易协定在产品、协议和时间方面的影响的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Swiss Free Trade Agreements on Agricultural Trade

The Effect of Swiss Free Trade Agreements on Agricultural Trade

As a country highly dependent on imports, Switzerland has many free trade agreements (FTAs) that liberalise trade barriers. We assess how these agreements affect Swiss agricultural imports at different margins of trade adjustment. We estimate reduced-form gravity models using agricultural trade data for 202 partner countries from 2004 to 2022. We find that Swiss FTAs increase agricultural import values by 8.75%, decrease import prices by 3%, increase the probability of imports by 2% and reduce market exit rates by 1%. These effects are heterogeneous across products, sectors and agreements. Regarding import values and quantities, the positive effects of FTAs are mainly observed for raw products (including vegetables, fruits and nuts, coffee, tea and spices). However, the estimated effects are negative for processed products. Regarding import prices, the effects are positive whenever they are statistically significant. We also find that the number of competing agreements to which a Swiss trade partner is exposed only marginally affects Swiss imports. We extend our analysis to agricultural exports and find that FTAs increase Swiss export values by 47%, quantities by 53% and prices by 3% but do not affect export probabilities or export market exit rates. Thus, although Swiss FTAs generally boost trade on average, policymaking should consider the heterogeneities of the estimated FTA effects regarding products, agreements and time when using FTA estimates for counterfactual analysis and negotiations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kyklos
Kyklos ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: KYKLOS views economics as a social science and as such favours contributions dealing with issues relevant to contemporary society, as well as economic policy applications. Since its inception nearly 60 years ago, KYKLOS has earned a worldwide reputation for publishing a broad range of articles from international scholars on real world issues. KYKLOS encourages unorthodox, original approaches to topical economic and social issues with a multinational application, and promises to give fresh insights into topics of worldwide interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信