栎和栎在湖泊水处理中的吸附潜力的探索性评价

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yvan Anderson Tchangoue Ngandjui, Titus Alfred Makudali Msagati, Alex Tawanda Kuvarega
{"title":"栎和栎在湖泊水处理中的吸附潜力的探索性评价","authors":"Yvan Anderson Tchangoue Ngandjui,&nbsp;Titus Alfred Makudali Msagati,&nbsp;Alex Tawanda Kuvarega","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-08485-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assessed and compared the effects of <i>Quercus robur</i> (QRO) and <i>Quercus rugosa</i> (QRU) seed extracts as natural coagulants on the physicochemical properties of lake water in Johannesburg. Jar test experiments were conducted using dosage concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mL, with settling times of 30, 60, and 90 min. The treatments led to 100% turbidity removal across all tested dosages within 90 min. Dissolved oxygen significantly improved, increasing from 1.65 ± 0.02 mg/L in raw lake water to 2.39 ± 0.01 mg/L and 2.33 ± 0.01 mg/L after treatments with QRU and QRO, respectively. Conversely, pH levels decreased from 7.42 ± 0.03 to 7.06 ± 0.02 with QRO and 7.16 ± 0.04 with QRU. Total dissolved solids were reduced from 97.67 ± 1.53 mg/L to 70.33 ± 0.58 mg/L with QRO and 71.33 ± 0.58 mg/L using QRU. A corresponding decline in conductivity was observed, from 192.0 ± 1.0 µS/cm to 141.33 ± 0.58 µS/cm with QRO and 142.33 ± 0.58 µS/cm with QRU. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlighted clear distinctions between treated samples and raw lake water, with the treated samples clustering away from untreated water and aligning with improved physicochemical indicators. The findings demonstrate the efficacy of <i>Q. robur</i> and <i>Q. rugosa</i> seed extracts in enhancing water quality and their suitability as low-cost, natural alternatives to conventional coagulants. Post-treatment values for all key parameters met the World Health Organization's recommended limits for drinking water, underscoring the potential of these materials for sustainable water purification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-025-08485-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explorative Evaluation of the Adsorptive Potential of Quercus robur and Quercus rugosa for Lake Water Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Yvan Anderson Tchangoue Ngandjui,&nbsp;Titus Alfred Makudali Msagati,&nbsp;Alex Tawanda Kuvarega\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-025-08485-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study assessed and compared the effects of <i>Quercus robur</i> (QRO) and <i>Quercus rugosa</i> (QRU) seed extracts as natural coagulants on the physicochemical properties of lake water in Johannesburg. Jar test experiments were conducted using dosage concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mL, with settling times of 30, 60, and 90 min. The treatments led to 100% turbidity removal across all tested dosages within 90 min. Dissolved oxygen significantly improved, increasing from 1.65 ± 0.02 mg/L in raw lake water to 2.39 ± 0.01 mg/L and 2.33 ± 0.01 mg/L after treatments with QRU and QRO, respectively. Conversely, pH levels decreased from 7.42 ± 0.03 to 7.06 ± 0.02 with QRO and 7.16 ± 0.04 with QRU. Total dissolved solids were reduced from 97.67 ± 1.53 mg/L to 70.33 ± 0.58 mg/L with QRO and 71.33 ± 0.58 mg/L using QRU. A corresponding decline in conductivity was observed, from 192.0 ± 1.0 µS/cm to 141.33 ± 0.58 µS/cm with QRO and 142.33 ± 0.58 µS/cm with QRU. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlighted clear distinctions between treated samples and raw lake water, with the treated samples clustering away from untreated water and aligning with improved physicochemical indicators. The findings demonstrate the efficacy of <i>Q. robur</i> and <i>Q. rugosa</i> seed extracts in enhancing water quality and their suitability as low-cost, natural alternatives to conventional coagulants. Post-treatment values for all key parameters met the World Health Organization's recommended limits for drinking water, underscoring the potential of these materials for sustainable water purification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-025-08485-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08485-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08485-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评价并比较了栎木(Quercus robur, QRO)和栎木(Quercus rugosa, QRU)种子提取物作为天然混凝剂对约翰内斯堡湖区湖水理化性质的影响。分别以15、20、25 mL的剂量浓度进行瓶试实验,沉淀时间分别为30、60、90 min。处理导致所有测试剂量在90分钟内100%的浊度去除。湖水溶解氧浓度显著提高,原水溶解氧浓度由1.65±0.02 mg/L提高至2.39±0.01 mg/L, QRU和QRO处理后溶解氧浓度分别为2.33±0.01 mg/L。相反,QRO的pH值从7.42±0.03降至7.06±0.02,QRU的pH值为7.16±0.04。总溶解固形物由QRO的97.67±1.53 mg/L降至70.33±0.58 mg/L, QRU的71.33±0.58 mg/L。QRO和QRU的电导率分别从192.0±1.0µS/cm和141.33±0.58µS/cm下降到142.33±0.58µS/cm。主成分分析(PCA)强调了处理后的样本和原始湖水之间的明显区别,处理后的样本聚类远离未经处理的水,并与改进的物理化学指标保持一致。研究结果表明,刺蒺藜和刺蒺藜种子提取物具有改善水质的功效,是传统混凝剂的低成本天然替代品。所有关键参数的处理后值均符合世界卫生组织建议的饮用水限值,强调了这些材料在可持续水净化方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explorative Evaluation of the Adsorptive Potential of Quercus robur and Quercus rugosa for Lake Water Treatment

This study assessed and compared the effects of Quercus robur (QRO) and Quercus rugosa (QRU) seed extracts as natural coagulants on the physicochemical properties of lake water in Johannesburg. Jar test experiments were conducted using dosage concentrations of 15, 20, and 25 mL, with settling times of 30, 60, and 90 min. The treatments led to 100% turbidity removal across all tested dosages within 90 min. Dissolved oxygen significantly improved, increasing from 1.65 ± 0.02 mg/L in raw lake water to 2.39 ± 0.01 mg/L and 2.33 ± 0.01 mg/L after treatments with QRU and QRO, respectively. Conversely, pH levels decreased from 7.42 ± 0.03 to 7.06 ± 0.02 with QRO and 7.16 ± 0.04 with QRU. Total dissolved solids were reduced from 97.67 ± 1.53 mg/L to 70.33 ± 0.58 mg/L with QRO and 71.33 ± 0.58 mg/L using QRU. A corresponding decline in conductivity was observed, from 192.0 ± 1.0 µS/cm to 141.33 ± 0.58 µS/cm with QRO and 142.33 ± 0.58 µS/cm with QRU. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlighted clear distinctions between treated samples and raw lake water, with the treated samples clustering away from untreated water and aligning with improved physicochemical indicators. The findings demonstrate the efficacy of Q. robur and Q. rugosa seed extracts in enhancing water quality and their suitability as low-cost, natural alternatives to conventional coagulants. Post-treatment values for all key parameters met the World Health Organization's recommended limits for drinking water, underscoring the potential of these materials for sustainable water purification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信