基于小波变换的PM2.5与气象因子及其他大气污染物的标度响应

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yuyao Liu, Yongjun Ye, Zanchao Xu, Hanqing Wang
{"title":"基于小波变换的PM2.5与气象因子及其他大气污染物的标度响应","authors":"Yuyao Liu,&nbsp;Yongjun Ye,&nbsp;Zanchao Xu,&nbsp;Hanqing Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-08546-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To quantify the spatiotemporal variations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its response relationship with the driving factors (including meteorological factors and other air pollutants) in the multi-scale time–frequency domain, the monitoring data of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its driving factors in Hunan Province from 2017 to 2021 were researched via four wavelet transform methods including continuous wavelet transform (CWT), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), wavelet transform coherence (WTC), and multiple wavelet coherence (MWC). Results revealed that: (1) The annual average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration exhibited a decreasing trend, with a cumulative decrease of 27.2%. The seasonal distribution pattern of PM<sub>2.5</sub> was winter &gt; fall &gt; spring &gt; summer. (2) The mutation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mainly occurred in winter and was particularly concentrated in the Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration. The periodicity of 250–280 days was the dominant cycle in the time series. In addition, 30–40- and 70–80-day cycles were observed in winter and from autumn to winter, respectively. (3) The response of PM<sub>2.5</sub> to its driving factors depended on the time–frequency scale and the combination of factors. For the meteorological factors, temperature (TEM) was the strongest single factor that affected PM<sub>2.5</sub> at all time–frequency scale. Meanwhile, the coherence increased with an increasing number of meteorological factors. The other air pollutants had higher abilities to explain PM<sub>2.5</sub> variations than the meteorological factors. Among them, PM<sub>10</sub> was the strongest single factor that affected the PM<sub>2.5</sub> at all time–frequency scale, with a significant positive coherence between the two. The tetravariate combination of PM<sub>10</sub>-SO<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>-CO at the large time–frequency scales showed the highest degree of explanation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration variations among all combinations. (4) Combining meteorological and pollutant factors significantly improves PM<sub>2.5</sub> variation explanation, but more factors do not guarantee better results. The research results of this paper may provide a reference for more precise identification of the influencing factors of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the formulation of related air pollution control policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wavelet Transform-based Scaling Response of PM2.5 with Meteorological Factors and Other Air Pollutants\",\"authors\":\"Yuyao Liu,&nbsp;Yongjun Ye,&nbsp;Zanchao Xu,&nbsp;Hanqing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-025-08546-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To quantify the spatiotemporal variations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its response relationship with the driving factors (including meteorological factors and other air pollutants) in the multi-scale time–frequency domain, the monitoring data of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and its driving factors in Hunan Province from 2017 to 2021 were researched via four wavelet transform methods including continuous wavelet transform (CWT), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), wavelet transform coherence (WTC), and multiple wavelet coherence (MWC). Results revealed that: (1) The annual average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration exhibited a decreasing trend, with a cumulative decrease of 27.2%. The seasonal distribution pattern of PM<sub>2.5</sub> was winter &gt; fall &gt; spring &gt; summer. (2) The mutation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mainly occurred in winter and was particularly concentrated in the Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration. The periodicity of 250–280 days was the dominant cycle in the time series. In addition, 30–40- and 70–80-day cycles were observed in winter and from autumn to winter, respectively. (3) The response of PM<sub>2.5</sub> to its driving factors depended on the time–frequency scale and the combination of factors. For the meteorological factors, temperature (TEM) was the strongest single factor that affected PM<sub>2.5</sub> at all time–frequency scale. Meanwhile, the coherence increased with an increasing number of meteorological factors. The other air pollutants had higher abilities to explain PM<sub>2.5</sub> variations than the meteorological factors. Among them, PM<sub>10</sub> was the strongest single factor that affected the PM<sub>2.5</sub> at all time–frequency scale, with a significant positive coherence between the two. The tetravariate combination of PM<sub>10</sub>-SO<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>-CO at the large time–frequency scales showed the highest degree of explanation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration variations among all combinations. (4) Combining meteorological and pollutant factors significantly improves PM<sub>2.5</sub> variation explanation, but more factors do not guarantee better results. The research results of this paper may provide a reference for more precise identification of the influencing factors of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the formulation of related air pollution control policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08546-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08546-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为量化多尺度时频域PM2.5的时空变化及其与驱动因子(包括气象因子和其他大气污染物)的响应关系,采用连续小波变换(CWT)、离散小波变换(DWT)、相干小波变换(WTC)、连续小波变换(CWT)和连续小波变换(WTC) 4种小波变换方法对湖南省2017 - 2021年PM2.5及其驱动因子监测数据进行研究。和多小波相干(MWC)。结果表明:(1)年平均PM2.5浓度呈下降趋势,累计下降27.2%;PM2.5的季节分布格局为冬、秋、春、夏。(2) PM2.5的突变主要发生在冬季,尤其集中在长株潭城市群。250 ~ 280 d为时间序列的主导周期。此外,冬季和秋冬分别有30 ~ 40天和70 ~ 80天的周期。(3) PM2.5对驱动因子的响应取决于时频尺度和因子组合。在气象因子中,温度(TEM)是各时频尺度下对PM2.5影响最大的单一因子。同时,相干性随气象因子数量的增加而增加。与气象因子相比,其他空气污染物对PM2.5变化的解释能力更强。其中,PM10是各时频尺度下对PM2.5影响最强的单一因子,二者之间存在显著的正相干性。PM10-SO2-O3-CO的四变量组合在大时频尺度上对PM2.5浓度变化的解释程度最高。(4)气象因子与污染物因子的结合显著改善了PM2.5的变异解释,但因子多并不保证解释效果好。本文的研究结果可为更精确地识别PM2.5的影响因素和制定相关的大气污染控制政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wavelet Transform-based Scaling Response of PM2.5 with Meteorological Factors and Other Air Pollutants

To quantify the spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 and its response relationship with the driving factors (including meteorological factors and other air pollutants) in the multi-scale time–frequency domain, the monitoring data of PM2.5 and its driving factors in Hunan Province from 2017 to 2021 were researched via four wavelet transform methods including continuous wavelet transform (CWT), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), wavelet transform coherence (WTC), and multiple wavelet coherence (MWC). Results revealed that: (1) The annual average PM2.5 concentration exhibited a decreasing trend, with a cumulative decrease of 27.2%. The seasonal distribution pattern of PM2.5 was winter > fall > spring > summer. (2) The mutation of PM2.5 mainly occurred in winter and was particularly concentrated in the Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration. The periodicity of 250–280 days was the dominant cycle in the time series. In addition, 30–40- and 70–80-day cycles were observed in winter and from autumn to winter, respectively. (3) The response of PM2.5 to its driving factors depended on the time–frequency scale and the combination of factors. For the meteorological factors, temperature (TEM) was the strongest single factor that affected PM2.5 at all time–frequency scale. Meanwhile, the coherence increased with an increasing number of meteorological factors. The other air pollutants had higher abilities to explain PM2.5 variations than the meteorological factors. Among them, PM10 was the strongest single factor that affected the PM2.5 at all time–frequency scale, with a significant positive coherence between the two. The tetravariate combination of PM10-SO2-O3-CO at the large time–frequency scales showed the highest degree of explanation of PM2.5 concentration variations among all combinations. (4) Combining meteorological and pollutant factors significantly improves PM2.5 variation explanation, but more factors do not guarantee better results. The research results of this paper may provide a reference for more precise identification of the influencing factors of PM2.5 and the formulation of related air pollution control policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信