Song Wang, Xianming Xie, Jie Luo, Min Cao, Siyao Feng
{"title":"广东省典型工业区与生态区污染评价及污染源确定的比较研究","authors":"Song Wang, Xianming Xie, Jie Luo, Min Cao, Siyao Feng","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-08614-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comparative analysis was conducted on the contamination levels and distribution of 12 metals/metalloids in soil from core cities in the Pearl River Delta, specifically Guangzhou (Nansha District) and Qingyuan (Qingcheng District), an ecological protection area. A total of 369 and 365 samples were collected from Nansha and Qingcheng, respectively. Contrary to past perceptions, metal/metalloid pollution in the more developed Nansha District was less severe than in the less developed Qingcheng District. Using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, pollution sources were assessed. In Nansha, four sources were identified: agricultural activities (Cd from fertilizers), natural sources (Cr, Cu, Ni, Hg from weathering), transportation/industrial emissions (Pb, As, Zn), and parent material (Co, V, Mo, Sb). Qingcheng had three sources: industrial activities (As, Cd, Sb from waste), transportation emissions (Hg, Pb, Zn, Mo), and natural sources (Cr, Cu, Ni, Co, V). Nansha exhibited more complex sources yet lower ecological risk compared to Qingcheng’s medium risk. The priority pollution sources at different risk levels were identified, providing a theoretical basis for the local government to formulate and implement targeted policies to reduce environmental pollution and health risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Contamination Assessment and Source Determination of Typical Industrial and Ecological Zones in Guangdong Province, China\",\"authors\":\"Song Wang, Xianming Xie, Jie Luo, Min Cao, Siyao Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-025-08614-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A comparative analysis was conducted on the contamination levels and distribution of 12 metals/metalloids in soil from core cities in the Pearl River Delta, specifically Guangzhou (Nansha District) and Qingyuan (Qingcheng District), an ecological protection area. A total of 369 and 365 samples were collected from Nansha and Qingcheng, respectively. Contrary to past perceptions, metal/metalloid pollution in the more developed Nansha District was less severe than in the less developed Qingcheng District. Using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, pollution sources were assessed. In Nansha, four sources were identified: agricultural activities (Cd from fertilizers), natural sources (Cr, Cu, Ni, Hg from weathering), transportation/industrial emissions (Pb, As, Zn), and parent material (Co, V, Mo, Sb). Qingcheng had three sources: industrial activities (As, Cd, Sb from waste), transportation emissions (Hg, Pb, Zn, Mo), and natural sources (Cr, Cu, Ni, Co, V). Nansha exhibited more complex sources yet lower ecological risk compared to Qingcheng’s medium risk. The priority pollution sources at different risk levels were identified, providing a theoretical basis for the local government to formulate and implement targeted policies to reduce environmental pollution and health risks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08614-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-08614-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study on Contamination Assessment and Source Determination of Typical Industrial and Ecological Zones in Guangdong Province, China
A comparative analysis was conducted on the contamination levels and distribution of 12 metals/metalloids in soil from core cities in the Pearl River Delta, specifically Guangzhou (Nansha District) and Qingyuan (Qingcheng District), an ecological protection area. A total of 369 and 365 samples were collected from Nansha and Qingcheng, respectively. Contrary to past perceptions, metal/metalloid pollution in the more developed Nansha District was less severe than in the less developed Qingcheng District. Using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, pollution sources were assessed. In Nansha, four sources were identified: agricultural activities (Cd from fertilizers), natural sources (Cr, Cu, Ni, Hg from weathering), transportation/industrial emissions (Pb, As, Zn), and parent material (Co, V, Mo, Sb). Qingcheng had three sources: industrial activities (As, Cd, Sb from waste), transportation emissions (Hg, Pb, Zn, Mo), and natural sources (Cr, Cu, Ni, Co, V). Nansha exhibited more complex sources yet lower ecological risk compared to Qingcheng’s medium risk. The priority pollution sources at different risk levels were identified, providing a theoretical basis for the local government to formulate and implement targeted policies to reduce environmental pollution and health risks.
期刊介绍：
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
