压水堆与高温气冷堆耦合核热电联产系统动力学建模及电热互补机理

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zipeng Xu , Yibo Tian , Chao Cheng , Dan Gao , Heng Zhang , Jizhen Liu
{"title":"压水堆与高温气冷堆耦合核热电联产系统动力学建模及电热互补机理","authors":"Zipeng Xu ,&nbsp;Yibo Tian ,&nbsp;Chao Cheng ,&nbsp;Dan Gao ,&nbsp;Heng Zhang ,&nbsp;Jizhen Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid increase in renewable energy penetration, power grids face growing demands for flexible resources. Traditional nuclear power plants, limited by insufficient peak-shaving capability, struggle to meet flexibility requirements in high-renewable-penetration scenarios. This study develops and validates a nuclear cogeneration system model coupling pressurized water reactor and high-temperature gas-cooled reactor using Modelica language, proposes a coordinated control strategy for reactor-thermal-electric interactions. Dynamic characteristics under three typical operational modes—electric power regulation, thermal-power regulation, and thermo-electric coordination regulation—are simulated and analyzed. Comparative results demonstrate that the system exhibits multi-timescale coupled responses, with regulation times increasing in the order of electromechanical, pressure, and reactor dynamics. Despite the slow reactor response, fast and stable electric power regulation is achievable due to the buffering effect of the intermediate heating circuit on main steam pressure. Thermal power regulation exhibits weaker stability guarantees than electric power regulation. Under thermal-power regulation scenario, reactor power fluctuations peak over 160 MW (4.5 %Pe), while electric power and main steam pressure fluctuations are limited to 47 MW (3.9 %Pe) and 0.4 bar (0.6 %), respectively. In contrast, electric-power regulation scenario shows negligible state oscillations. The reactor-thermal-electric coordinated control strategy demonstrates strong electro-thermal complementarity: Reactor power variation and overshoot are reduced by 42 % and 55 %, respectively, while steam generator water level fluctuations decrease by 40 % (compared to electric-power regulation) and 64 % (compared to thermal-power regulation), significantly improving dynamic performance and stability during power regulation. This strategy provides a novel solution for nuclear power plants to support flexible grid operation in high-renewable-penetration scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 120570"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic modeling and electro-thermal complementarity mechanism of nuclear cogeneration system coupling pressurized water reactor & high-temperature gas-cooled reactor\",\"authors\":\"Zipeng Xu ,&nbsp;Yibo Tian ,&nbsp;Chao Cheng ,&nbsp;Dan Gao ,&nbsp;Heng Zhang ,&nbsp;Jizhen Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the rapid increase in renewable energy penetration, power grids face growing demands for flexible resources. Traditional nuclear power plants, limited by insufficient peak-shaving capability, struggle to meet flexibility requirements in high-renewable-penetration scenarios. This study develops and validates a nuclear cogeneration system model coupling pressurized water reactor and high-temperature gas-cooled reactor using Modelica language, proposes a coordinated control strategy for reactor-thermal-electric interactions. Dynamic characteristics under three typical operational modes—electric power regulation, thermal-power regulation, and thermo-electric coordination regulation—are simulated and analyzed. Comparative results demonstrate that the system exhibits multi-timescale coupled responses, with regulation times increasing in the order of electromechanical, pressure, and reactor dynamics. Despite the slow reactor response, fast and stable electric power regulation is achievable due to the buffering effect of the intermediate heating circuit on main steam pressure. Thermal power regulation exhibits weaker stability guarantees than electric power regulation. Under thermal-power regulation scenario, reactor power fluctuations peak over 160 MW (4.5 %Pe), while electric power and main steam pressure fluctuations are limited to 47 MW (3.9 %Pe) and 0.4 bar (0.6 %), respectively. In contrast, electric-power regulation scenario shows negligible state oscillations. The reactor-thermal-electric coordinated control strategy demonstrates strong electro-thermal complementarity: Reactor power variation and overshoot are reduced by 42 % and 55 %, respectively, while steam generator water level fluctuations decrease by 40 % (compared to electric-power regulation) and 64 % (compared to thermal-power regulation), significantly improving dynamic performance and stability during power regulation. This strategy provides a novel solution for nuclear power plants to support flexible grid operation in high-renewable-penetration scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425010945\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425010945","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着可再生能源的迅速普及,电网对灵活资源的需求日益增长。传统核电站受调峰能力不足的限制,难以满足高可再生能源渗透率情景下的灵活性要求。利用Modelica语言开发并验证了压水堆与高温气冷堆耦合的核热电联产系统模型,提出了堆-热电耦合的协调控制策略。对电力调节、热电调节和热电协调调节三种典型运行模式下的动态特性进行了仿真分析。对比结果表明,系统表现出多时间尺度的耦合响应,调节次数按机电动力学、压力动力学和反应器动力学的顺序递增。尽管反应堆反应缓慢,但由于中间加热回路对主蒸汽压力的缓冲作用,可以实现快速稳定的电力调节。与电力调节相比,热力调节的稳定性保障较弱。在热功率调节情景下,反应堆功率波动峰值超过160兆瓦(4.5% Pe),而电力和主蒸汽压力波动分别限制在47兆瓦(3.9% Pe)和0.4巴(0.6%)。相比之下,电力调节情景显示可以忽略不计的状态振荡。电抗器-热电协调控制策略表现出较强的电热互补性:与电力调节相比,反应堆功率变化和超调分别减少42%和55%,蒸汽发生器水位波动减少40%和64%(与热电调节相比),显著提高了功率调节过程中的动态性能和稳定性。该策略为核电厂在高可再生能源渗透率的情况下支持灵活的电网运行提供了一种新颖的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic modeling and electro-thermal complementarity mechanism of nuclear cogeneration system coupling pressurized water reactor & high-temperature gas-cooled reactor
With the rapid increase in renewable energy penetration, power grids face growing demands for flexible resources. Traditional nuclear power plants, limited by insufficient peak-shaving capability, struggle to meet flexibility requirements in high-renewable-penetration scenarios. This study develops and validates a nuclear cogeneration system model coupling pressurized water reactor and high-temperature gas-cooled reactor using Modelica language, proposes a coordinated control strategy for reactor-thermal-electric interactions. Dynamic characteristics under three typical operational modes—electric power regulation, thermal-power regulation, and thermo-electric coordination regulation—are simulated and analyzed. Comparative results demonstrate that the system exhibits multi-timescale coupled responses, with regulation times increasing in the order of electromechanical, pressure, and reactor dynamics. Despite the slow reactor response, fast and stable electric power regulation is achievable due to the buffering effect of the intermediate heating circuit on main steam pressure. Thermal power regulation exhibits weaker stability guarantees than electric power regulation. Under thermal-power regulation scenario, reactor power fluctuations peak over 160 MW (4.5 %Pe), while electric power and main steam pressure fluctuations are limited to 47 MW (3.9 %Pe) and 0.4 bar (0.6 %), respectively. In contrast, electric-power regulation scenario shows negligible state oscillations. The reactor-thermal-electric coordinated control strategy demonstrates strong electro-thermal complementarity: Reactor power variation and overshoot are reduced by 42 % and 55 %, respectively, while steam generator water level fluctuations decrease by 40 % (compared to electric-power regulation) and 64 % (compared to thermal-power regulation), significantly improving dynamic performance and stability during power regulation. This strategy provides a novel solution for nuclear power plants to support flexible grid operation in high-renewable-penetration scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信