油气行业基于风险的资产完整性管理:从传统方法到机器学习方法的系统回顾

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tri Wahono , Agung Purniawan , Imam Mukhlash , Endah R.M. Putri
{"title":"油气行业基于风险的资产完整性管理:从传统方法到机器学习方法的系统回顾","authors":"Tri Wahono ,&nbsp;Agung Purniawan ,&nbsp;Imam Mukhlash ,&nbsp;Endah R.M. Putri","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil and gas operations are categorized as high-risk because they involve numerous equipment and complex processes. Asset integrity management (AIM) aims to mitigate the risk of failure resulting from degradation with corrosion as the primary cause and to maintain equipment safety and functionality. The risk-based inspection (RBI) methodology is one of the AIM processes that considers risks in decision-making to prioritize inspection and maintenance. This paper provides a comprehensive review of risk-based studies in the context of AIM activities. Risk-based AIM is categorized and reviewed based on risk analysis methods, including quantitative, qualitative, semi-quantitative, probabilistic, deterministic, hybrid probabilistic-deterministic, and dynamic or traditional risk. Most research areas used in case studies focus on pipeline applications. Analysis tools for risk assessment and control applied in risk-based AIM, including the evolution of tools from traditional to machine learning approaches, are examined. The current trends and future research opportunities for applying risk-based AIM are also discussed. This study offers risk assessment models for researchers and oil and gas industry practitioners that fit their specific requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 107287"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-based asset integrity management in the oil and gas industry from traditional to machine learning approaches: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Tri Wahono ,&nbsp;Agung Purniawan ,&nbsp;Imam Mukhlash ,&nbsp;Endah R.M. Putri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oil and gas operations are categorized as high-risk because they involve numerous equipment and complex processes. Asset integrity management (AIM) aims to mitigate the risk of failure resulting from degradation with corrosion as the primary cause and to maintain equipment safety and functionality. The risk-based inspection (RBI) methodology is one of the AIM processes that considers risks in decision-making to prioritize inspection and maintenance. This paper provides a comprehensive review of risk-based studies in the context of AIM activities. Risk-based AIM is categorized and reviewed based on risk analysis methods, including quantitative, qualitative, semi-quantitative, probabilistic, deterministic, hybrid probabilistic-deterministic, and dynamic or traditional risk. Most research areas used in case studies focus on pipeline applications. Analysis tools for risk assessment and control applied in risk-based AIM, including the evolution of tools from traditional to machine learning approaches, are examined. The current trends and future research opportunities for applying risk-based AIM are also discussed. This study offers risk assessment models for researchers and oil and gas industry practitioners that fit their specific requirements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025033420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025033420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于涉及大量设备和复杂流程,石油和天然气作业被归类为高风险作业。资产完整性管理(AIM)旨在降低因腐蚀退化而导致的故障风险,并保持设备的安全性和功能性。基于风险的检查(RBI)方法是AIM过程中的一种,它在决策中考虑风险,以优先考虑检查和维护。本文提供了在AIM活动背景下基于风险的研究的全面回顾。基于风险的AIM根据风险分析方法进行分类和审查,包括定量、定性、半定量、概率、确定性、概率-确定性混合、动态或传统风险。案例研究中使用的大多数研究领域都集中在管道应用上。在基于风险的AIM中应用的风险评估和控制分析工具,包括从传统到机器学习方法的工具演变。讨论了基于风险的AIM应用的当前趋势和未来的研究机会。该研究为研究人员和油气行业从业者提供了适合其特定要求的风险评估模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk-based asset integrity management in the oil and gas industry from traditional to machine learning approaches: A systematic review
Oil and gas operations are categorized as high-risk because they involve numerous equipment and complex processes. Asset integrity management (AIM) aims to mitigate the risk of failure resulting from degradation with corrosion as the primary cause and to maintain equipment safety and functionality. The risk-based inspection (RBI) methodology is one of the AIM processes that considers risks in decision-making to prioritize inspection and maintenance. This paper provides a comprehensive review of risk-based studies in the context of AIM activities. Risk-based AIM is categorized and reviewed based on risk analysis methods, including quantitative, qualitative, semi-quantitative, probabilistic, deterministic, hybrid probabilistic-deterministic, and dynamic or traditional risk. Most research areas used in case studies focus on pipeline applications. Analysis tools for risk assessment and control applied in risk-based AIM, including the evolution of tools from traditional to machine learning approaches, are examined. The current trends and future research opportunities for applying risk-based AIM are also discussed. This study offers risk assessment models for researchers and oil and gas industry practitioners that fit their specific requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信