Wuqiang Long , Dexiang Xi , Jianqin Fu , Xilei Sun
{"title":"混合动力汽车不同行驶周期能量流分布及暂态特性试验与仿真相结合研究","authors":"Wuqiang Long , Dexiang Xi , Jianqin Fu , Xilei Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy flow analysis is pivotal for improving hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) efficiency. In this study, an integrated simulation model for a P3-architecture parallel HEV was developed and calibrated with experimental data, and energy flow distribution and transient behavior were evaluated across World Light Vehicle Test Cycle (WLTC), China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P) and New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Headline results show fuel consumption of 5.37, 4.28 and 4.69 L per 100 km for WLTC, CLTC-P and NEDC, respectively. Despite the higher total energy demand of WLTC, aggregate drivetrain losses are the lowest among the three cycles, and engine operating points under WLTC and NEDC cluster in low to medium map regions that are consistent with better fuel economy. Motor efficiency ranks CLTC-P > NEDC > WLTC, reflecting the more rapidly varying load and speed under WLTC. The battery state of charge declines most rapidly in WLTC, with propulsion predominantly electric at low speeds and transitioning to parallel operation as speed increases. These findings provide validated, cycle-specific insights for calibrating control strategies and improving energy utilization in HEVs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 104144"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated experimental and simulation study on energy flow distribution and transient characteristics of hybrid electric vehicles across varied driving cycles\",\"authors\":\"Wuqiang Long , Dexiang Xi , Jianqin Fu , Xilei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsep.2025.104144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy flow analysis is pivotal for improving hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) efficiency. In this study, an integrated simulation model for a P3-architecture parallel HEV was developed and calibrated with experimental data, and energy flow distribution and transient behavior were evaluated across World Light Vehicle Test Cycle (WLTC), China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P) and New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Headline results show fuel consumption of 5.37, 4.28 and 4.69 L per 100 km for WLTC, CLTC-P and NEDC, respectively. Despite the higher total energy demand of WLTC, aggregate drivetrain losses are the lowest among the three cycles, and engine operating points under WLTC and NEDC cluster in low to medium map regions that are consistent with better fuel economy. Motor efficiency ranks CLTC-P > NEDC > WLTC, reflecting the more rapidly varying load and speed under WLTC. The battery state of charge declines most rapidly in WLTC, with propulsion predominantly electric at low speeds and transitioning to parallel operation as speed increases. These findings provide validated, cycle-specific insights for calibrating control strategies and improving energy utilization in HEVs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904925009357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated experimental and simulation study on energy flow distribution and transient characteristics of hybrid electric vehicles across varied driving cycles
Energy flow analysis is pivotal for improving hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) efficiency. In this study, an integrated simulation model for a P3-architecture parallel HEV was developed and calibrated with experimental data, and energy flow distribution and transient behavior were evaluated across World Light Vehicle Test Cycle (WLTC), China Light-Duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P) and New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Headline results show fuel consumption of 5.37, 4.28 and 4.69 L per 100 km for WLTC, CLTC-P and NEDC, respectively. Despite the higher total energy demand of WLTC, aggregate drivetrain losses are the lowest among the three cycles, and engine operating points under WLTC and NEDC cluster in low to medium map regions that are consistent with better fuel economy. Motor efficiency ranks CLTC-P > NEDC > WLTC, reflecting the more rapidly varying load and speed under WLTC. The battery state of charge declines most rapidly in WLTC, with propulsion predominantly electric at low speeds and transitioning to parallel operation as speed increases. These findings provide validated, cycle-specific insights for calibrating control strategies and improving energy utilization in HEVs.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.