Kim Wolters , Saskia van der Oord , Steven W. Evans , Barbara van den Hoofdakker , Bianca E. Boyer
{"title":"中学一年级学生校本规划方案的有效性:一项聚类随机对照试验","authors":"Kim Wolters , Saskia van der Oord , Steven W. Evans , Barbara van den Hoofdakker , Bianca E. Boyer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In secondary education, many students have difficulties planning their schoolwork. These difficulties may not only lead to short-term consequences such as lower grades, but also to long-term psychosocial, professional and financial challenges. To support students with planning problems, we developed a school-based program (Planning of Schoolwork (PLOS)) using an iterative development approach. PLOS includes two phases: PLOS-basic, a six-lesson preventive program with in-class skills training and PLOS-extra, a six-session, individual, modular skills training for students who still need support after PLOS-basic. This cluster randomized controlled trial compares the short- and long-term effects of PLOS-extra to practice-as-usual (PAU) with 213 first year students (aged 11-14, 78.9% male) who still had planning problems after PLOS-basic. Primary outcomes were homework problems and planning skills. Secondary outcomes included school motivation, classroom behavior, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) behaviors and school grades. We found no significant short- or long-term between-group differences on either the primary or the secondary outcome measures. Some significant improvements over time were present for both the PLOS-extra and the PAU group. The lack of effects of PLOS-extra may be attributed to a natural improvement of planning skills, the moderate severity of planning problems in our sample or the design of the program. Furthermore, the schools faced challenges in securing the necessary resources to implement the program effectively. Although PLOS-extra was developed in collaboration with end-users, these challenges demonstrate the complexity of developing training programs that are feasible within the educational context. School professionals and policymakers must decide whether to invest time, effort and resources into implementing evidence-based planning programs or in developing and testing new programs that offer support throughout daily academic life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 102820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of a school-based planning program for first year students in secondary school: A cluster randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Kim Wolters , Saskia van der Oord , Steven W. Evans , Barbara van den Hoofdakker , Bianca E. Boyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In secondary education, many students have difficulties planning their schoolwork. These difficulties may not only lead to short-term consequences such as lower grades, but also to long-term psychosocial, professional and financial challenges. To support students with planning problems, we developed a school-based program (Planning of Schoolwork (PLOS)) using an iterative development approach. PLOS includes two phases: PLOS-basic, a six-lesson preventive program with in-class skills training and PLOS-extra, a six-session, individual, modular skills training for students who still need support after PLOS-basic. This cluster randomized controlled trial compares the short- and long-term effects of PLOS-extra to practice-as-usual (PAU) with 213 first year students (aged 11-14, 78.9% male) who still had planning problems after PLOS-basic. Primary outcomes were homework problems and planning skills. Secondary outcomes included school motivation, classroom behavior, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) behaviors and school grades. We found no significant short- or long-term between-group differences on either the primary or the secondary outcome measures. Some significant improvements over time were present for both the PLOS-extra and the PAU group. The lack of effects of PLOS-extra may be attributed to a natural improvement of planning skills, the moderate severity of planning problems in our sample or the design of the program. Furthermore, the schools faced challenges in securing the necessary resources to implement the program effectively. Although PLOS-extra was developed in collaboration with end-users, these challenges demonstrate the complexity of developing training programs that are feasible within the educational context. School professionals and policymakers must decide whether to invest time, effort and resources into implementing evidence-based planning programs or in developing and testing new programs that offer support throughout daily academic life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035525002939\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035525002939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effectiveness of a school-based planning program for first year students in secondary school: A cluster randomized controlled trial
In secondary education, many students have difficulties planning their schoolwork. These difficulties may not only lead to short-term consequences such as lower grades, but also to long-term psychosocial, professional and financial challenges. To support students with planning problems, we developed a school-based program (Planning of Schoolwork (PLOS)) using an iterative development approach. PLOS includes two phases: PLOS-basic, a six-lesson preventive program with in-class skills training and PLOS-extra, a six-session, individual, modular skills training for students who still need support after PLOS-basic. This cluster randomized controlled trial compares the short- and long-term effects of PLOS-extra to practice-as-usual (PAU) with 213 first year students (aged 11-14, 78.9% male) who still had planning problems after PLOS-basic. Primary outcomes were homework problems and planning skills. Secondary outcomes included school motivation, classroom behavior, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) behaviors and school grades. We found no significant short- or long-term between-group differences on either the primary or the secondary outcome measures. Some significant improvements over time were present for both the PLOS-extra and the PAU group. The lack of effects of PLOS-extra may be attributed to a natural improvement of planning skills, the moderate severity of planning problems in our sample or the design of the program. Furthermore, the schools faced challenges in securing the necessary resources to implement the program effectively. Although PLOS-extra was developed in collaboration with end-users, these challenges demonstrate the complexity of developing training programs that are feasible within the educational context. School professionals and policymakers must decide whether to invest time, effort and resources into implementing evidence-based planning programs or in developing and testing new programs that offer support throughout daily academic life.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.