风险企业:比较社会企业家和商业企业家的机会评估决策

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Matthew D. Bird , Patrick Reichert , Vanina Farber
{"title":"风险企业:比较社会企业家和商业企业家的机会评估决策","authors":"Matthew D. Bird ,&nbsp;Patrick Reichert ,&nbsp;Vanina Farber","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Via a choice-based conjoint experiment and Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis (HBA) of 2538 decisions from 141 entrepreneurs, we model opportunity evaluations as a utility maximizing response to identify and compare part-worth utilities for distinct levels of value capture and risk/uncertainty. Contrary to predictions from existing theories of the social entrepreneur, we find that social entrepreneurs are more risk averse and have less utility for uncertainty. Exploratory post-hoc analysis indicates that the risk aversion of social entrepreneurs is partly driven by lower collective efficacy, suggesting that social entrepreneurs conceptualize risk and uncertainty as an “other-regarding” construct that considers and affects additional stakeholders. Just as social entrepreneurs seek to maximize social value, they likewise construe the risk of loss through a social lens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 112634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risky business: Comparing the opportunity evaluation decisions of social and commercial entrepreneurs\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D. Bird ,&nbsp;Patrick Reichert ,&nbsp;Vanina Farber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Via a choice-based conjoint experiment and Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis (HBA) of 2538 decisions from 141 entrepreneurs, we model opportunity evaluations as a utility maximizing response to identify and compare part-worth utilities for distinct levels of value capture and risk/uncertainty. Contrary to predictions from existing theories of the social entrepreneur, we find that social entrepreneurs are more risk averse and have less utility for uncertainty. Exploratory post-hoc analysis indicates that the risk aversion of social entrepreneurs is partly driven by lower collective efficacy, suggesting that social entrepreneurs conceptualize risk and uncertainty as an “other-regarding” construct that considers and affects additional stakeholders. Just as social entrepreneurs seek to maximize social value, they likewise construe the risk of loss through a social lens.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004719\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过基于选择的联合实验和层次贝叶斯分析(HBA),我们将141位企业家的2538个决策建模为效用最大化响应,以识别和比较不同水平的价值获取和风险/不确定性的部分价值效用。与现有社会企业家理论的预测相反,我们发现社会企业家更厌恶风险,对不确定性的效用更小。探索性事后分析表明,社会企业家的风险厌恶在一定程度上是由较低的集体效能驱动的,这表明社会企业家将风险和不确定性概念化为考虑并影响其他利益相关者的“他人”结构。正如社会企业家寻求最大化社会价值一样,他们同样通过社会视角来解释损失的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risky business: Comparing the opportunity evaluation decisions of social and commercial entrepreneurs
Via a choice-based conjoint experiment and Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis (HBA) of 2538 decisions from 141 entrepreneurs, we model opportunity evaluations as a utility maximizing response to identify and compare part-worth utilities for distinct levels of value capture and risk/uncertainty. Contrary to predictions from existing theories of the social entrepreneur, we find that social entrepreneurs are more risk averse and have less utility for uncertainty. Exploratory post-hoc analysis indicates that the risk aversion of social entrepreneurs is partly driven by lower collective efficacy, suggesting that social entrepreneurs conceptualize risk and uncertainty as an “other-regarding” construct that considers and affects additional stakeholders. Just as social entrepreneurs seek to maximize social value, they likewise construe the risk of loss through a social lens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信