人员流动对院外心脏骤停患者体外心肺复苏的影响:日本全国基于登记的分析

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kazuya Kikutani, Mitsuaki Nishikimi, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Nobuaki Shime
{"title":"人员流动对院外心脏骤停患者体外心肺复苏的影响:日本全国基于登记的分析","authors":"Kazuya Kikutani,&nbsp;Mitsuaki Nishikimi,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ohshimo,&nbsp;Nobuaki Shime","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of physician staff turnover on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, with a particular focus on those treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA Registry (2014–2022). Adult patients with cardiac arrest upon hospital arrival, including those who received ECPR, were analyzed. Patients were categorized by admission period: late March (18–31 March) and early April (1–14 April), corresponding to the annual physician turnover period in Japan. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for both the overall OHCA cohort and the ECPR-treated cohort, adjusting for age, bystander CPR, initial rhythm at hospital arrival, and time from emergency call to hospital arrival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort comprised 6036 OHCA patients, of whom 187 received ECPR. In the overall OHCA cohort, no significant difference in 30-day survival was observed between early April and late March. However, among ECPR patients, the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in early April (36.1 %) than in late March (21.2 %) (p = 0.035), with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.28 (95 % confidence interval: 1.03–5.16; p = 0.044).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the physician turnover period had no discernible impact on outcomes in the overall OHCA population, it was significantly associated with improved survival among ECPR-treated patients. These findings suggest that ECPR may benefit from institutional preparedness during staff transition, but should be interpreted cautiously given the study limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of staff turnover on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a nationwide registry-based analysis in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Kazuya Kikutani,&nbsp;Mitsuaki Nishikimi,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ohshimo,&nbsp;Nobuaki Shime\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of physician staff turnover on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, with a particular focus on those treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA Registry (2014–2022). Adult patients with cardiac arrest upon hospital arrival, including those who received ECPR, were analyzed. Patients were categorized by admission period: late March (18–31 March) and early April (1–14 April), corresponding to the annual physician turnover period in Japan. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for both the overall OHCA cohort and the ECPR-treated cohort, adjusting for age, bystander CPR, initial rhythm at hospital arrival, and time from emergency call to hospital arrival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort comprised 6036 OHCA patients, of whom 187 received ECPR. In the overall OHCA cohort, no significant difference in 30-day survival was observed between early April and late March. However, among ECPR patients, the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in early April (36.1 %) than in late March (21.2 %) (p = 0.035), with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.28 (95 % confidence interval: 1.03–5.16; p = 0.044).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the physician turnover period had no discernible impact on outcomes in the overall OHCA population, it was significantly associated with improved survival among ECPR-treated patients. These findings suggest that ECPR may benefit from institutional preparedness during staff transition, but should be interpreted cautiously given the study limitations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估医师人员变动对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者预后的影响,特别关注那些接受体外心肺复苏(ECPR)治疗的患者。方法采用日本急性医学协会OHCA登记处(2014-2022)的数据进行了一项全国性的回顾性队列研究。对到达医院后心脏骤停的成年患者进行分析,包括那些接受ECPR的患者。患者按入院时间进行分类:3月下旬(3月18-31日)和4月上旬(4月1-14日),对应于日本每年的医生更替期。主要终点为30天生存率。对总体OHCA队列和接受ecpr治疗的队列进行多变量logistic回归分析,调整年龄、旁观者CPR、到达医院时的初始心律以及从急诊呼叫到到达医院的时间。结果最终队列包括6036例OHCA患者,其中187例接受ECPR治疗。在整个OHCA队列中,在4月初和3月底之间观察到30天生存率无显著差异。然而,在ECPR患者中,4月上旬的30天生存率(36.1%)明显高于3月下旬(21.2%)(p = 0.035),校正优势比为2.28(95%可信区间:1.03-5.16;p = 0.044)。结论:虽然医生更换周期对总体OHCA人群的预后没有明显影响,但它与接受ecpr治疗的患者的生存率显著相关。这些发现表明,ECPR可能受益于工作人员过渡期间的机构准备,但鉴于研究的局限性,应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of staff turnover on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a nationwide registry-based analysis in Japan

Aim

To evaluate the impact of physician staff turnover on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, with a particular focus on those treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

Methods

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA Registry (2014–2022). Adult patients with cardiac arrest upon hospital arrival, including those who received ECPR, were analyzed. Patients were categorized by admission period: late March (18–31 March) and early April (1–14 April), corresponding to the annual physician turnover period in Japan. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for both the overall OHCA cohort and the ECPR-treated cohort, adjusting for age, bystander CPR, initial rhythm at hospital arrival, and time from emergency call to hospital arrival.

Results

The final cohort comprised 6036 OHCA patients, of whom 187 received ECPR. In the overall OHCA cohort, no significant difference in 30-day survival was observed between early April and late March. However, among ECPR patients, the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in early April (36.1 %) than in late March (21.2 %) (p = 0.035), with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.28 (95 % confidence interval: 1.03–5.16; p = 0.044).

Conclusions

While the physician turnover period had no discernible impact on outcomes in the overall OHCA population, it was significantly associated with improved survival among ECPR-treated patients. These findings suggest that ECPR may benefit from institutional preparedness during staff transition, but should be interpreted cautiously given the study limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信