Yan Wang , Xiaohui Guo , Qiulin Bi , Wen Zhou , Hongxi Yao , Jiacun Gu , Yanping Wang
{"title":"两种树种的吸收根和运输根对土壤盐度的响应不同","authors":"Yan Wang , Xiaohui Guo , Qiulin Bi , Wen Zhou , Hongxi Yao , Jiacun Gu , Yanping Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.flora.2025.152847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Salinization is one of the factors seriously affecting the stability of forest ecosystems in coastal areas worldwide, which limits root growth and has adverse effects on forest development. Fine roots of woody plants can be divided into absorptive and transport roots; however, their responses to salinization along soil layers and the potential adaptation mechanisms remain unclear. Herein, absorptive and transport roots of <em>Styphnolobium japonicum</em> (L.) Schott and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> L. in Yellow River Delta were collected in different soil layers, and their functional trait variations were analyzed, respectively. Absorptive roots exhibited greater respiration rates (RR), specific root length and area (SRL and SRA), nitrogen content, but lower root diameter (RD), tissue density (RTD), and dry matter contents than transport roots. Generally, compared with non-salinized roots, salinized absorptive roots had higher RR, lower SRL and SRA, while transport roots were relatively conservative. <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> was more sensitive to soil salinization than <em>S. japonicum</em>. Additionally, with the increase of soil depth in both sites, greater responses of SRL, RR, and nitrogen content were found in absorptive roots, whereas larger changes of RD and RTD in transport roots. These results highlight that the acquisitive strategy of absorptive roots, rather than the conservative strategy of transport roots, facilitates resource acquisition in responding to soil salinity. Our findings also imply the importance of applying root functional-based classification in the ecological progress for understanding the root resource foraging strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55156,"journal":{"name":"Flora","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 152847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absorptive and transport roots of two tree species respond differently to soil salinity along soil depth\",\"authors\":\"Yan Wang , Xiaohui Guo , Qiulin Bi , Wen Zhou , Hongxi Yao , Jiacun Gu , Yanping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.flora.2025.152847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Salinization is one of the factors seriously affecting the stability of forest ecosystems in coastal areas worldwide, which limits root growth and has adverse effects on forest development. Fine roots of woody plants can be divided into absorptive and transport roots; however, their responses to salinization along soil layers and the potential adaptation mechanisms remain unclear. Herein, absorptive and transport roots of <em>Styphnolobium japonicum</em> (L.) Schott and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> L. in Yellow River Delta were collected in different soil layers, and their functional trait variations were analyzed, respectively. Absorptive roots exhibited greater respiration rates (RR), specific root length and area (SRL and SRA), nitrogen content, but lower root diameter (RD), tissue density (RTD), and dry matter contents than transport roots. Generally, compared with non-salinized roots, salinized absorptive roots had higher RR, lower SRL and SRA, while transport roots were relatively conservative. <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> was more sensitive to soil salinization than <em>S. japonicum</em>. Additionally, with the increase of soil depth in both sites, greater responses of SRL, RR, and nitrogen content were found in absorptive roots, whereas larger changes of RD and RTD in transport roots. These results highlight that the acquisitive strategy of absorptive roots, rather than the conservative strategy of transport roots, facilitates resource acquisition in responding to soil salinity. Our findings also imply the importance of applying root functional-based classification in the ecological progress for understanding the root resource foraging strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flora\",\"volume\":\"332 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253025001744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flora","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0367253025001744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Absorptive and transport roots of two tree species respond differently to soil salinity along soil depth
Salinization is one of the factors seriously affecting the stability of forest ecosystems in coastal areas worldwide, which limits root growth and has adverse effects on forest development. Fine roots of woody plants can be divided into absorptive and transport roots; however, their responses to salinization along soil layers and the potential adaptation mechanisms remain unclear. Herein, absorptive and transport roots of Styphnolobium japonicum (L.) Schott and Robinia pseudoacacia L. in Yellow River Delta were collected in different soil layers, and their functional trait variations were analyzed, respectively. Absorptive roots exhibited greater respiration rates (RR), specific root length and area (SRL and SRA), nitrogen content, but lower root diameter (RD), tissue density (RTD), and dry matter contents than transport roots. Generally, compared with non-salinized roots, salinized absorptive roots had higher RR, lower SRL and SRA, while transport roots were relatively conservative. Robinia pseudoacacia was more sensitive to soil salinization than S. japonicum. Additionally, with the increase of soil depth in both sites, greater responses of SRL, RR, and nitrogen content were found in absorptive roots, whereas larger changes of RD and RTD in transport roots. These results highlight that the acquisitive strategy of absorptive roots, rather than the conservative strategy of transport roots, facilitates resource acquisition in responding to soil salinity. Our findings also imply the importance of applying root functional-based classification in the ecological progress for understanding the root resource foraging strategies.
期刊介绍:
FLORA publishes original contributions and review articles on plant structure (morphology and anatomy), plant distribution (incl. phylogeography) and plant functional ecology (ecophysiology, population ecology and population genetics, organismic interactions, community ecology, ecosystem ecology). Manuscripts (both original and review articles) on a single topic can be compiled in Special Issues, for which suggestions are welcome.
FLORA, the scientific botanical journal with the longest uninterrupted publication sequence (since 1818), considers manuscripts in the above areas which appeal a broad scientific and international readership. Manuscripts focused on floristics and vegetation science will only be considered if they exceed the pure descriptive approach and have relevance for interpreting plant morphology, distribution or ecology. Manuscripts whose content is restricted to purely systematic and nomenclature matters, to geobotanical aspects of only local interest, to pure applications in agri-, horti- or silviculture and pharmacology, and experimental studies dealing exclusively with investigations at the cellular and subcellular level will not be accepted. Manuscripts dealing with comparative and evolutionary aspects of morphology, anatomy and development are welcome.